Renal outcomes in Asian patients receiving oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Hong Kong Med J 2022 Feb;28(1):24–32  |  Epub 5 Nov 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Renal outcomes in Asian patients receiving oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Tayyab Salim Shahzada, Cosmos L Guo, Alex PW Lee, MD, FRCP
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Prof Alex PW Lee (alexpwlee@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) may be prescribed warfarin or a non–vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC). There is increasing evidence that NOACs are superior to warfarin in terms of renal function preservation. This study aimed to compare renal outcomes in Chinese patients with NVAF between patients receiving NOACs and patients receiving warfarin.
 
Methods: In total, 600 Chinese patients with NVAF receiving oral anticoagulant therapy were retrospectively identified from an administrative database. The renal outcomes (≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], doubling of serum creatinine, and kidney failure) were compared among four propensity-weighted treatment cohorts (warfarin, n=200; rivaroxaban, n=200; dabigatran, n=100; and apixaban, n=100).
 
Results: The mean follow-up period across all groups was 1000 ± 436 days. Compared with warfarin, the three NOACs (pooled for consideration as a single unit) had significantly lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR (hazard ratio [HR]=0.339; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.276-0.417) and doubling of serum creatinine (HR=0.550; 95% CI=0.387-0.782). Dabigatran and rivaroxaban users both had lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR (both P<0.001) and doubling of serum creatinine (both P<0.05). Apixaban was only significantly associated with a lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR (P<0.001).
 
Conclusions: Compared with warfarin, NOACs may be associated with a significantly lower risk of decline in renal function among Chinese patients with NVAF.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • Decline in kidney function is common among Chinese patients who receive oral anticoagulant treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
  • Warfarin usage is associated with significant long-term decline in renal function among patients treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
  • Compared with warfarin, non–vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) usage may be associated with a reduced risk of long-term decline in renal function among Chinese patients.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Patients receiving oral anticoagulants, especially warfarin, should undergo close renal function monitoring during the course of treatment.
  • Considering that the decline in renal function may be more accelerated in warfarin users than in NOAC users, clinicians may consider preferential use of NOACs for anticoagulant therapy, especially in patients with existing renal impairment or risk factors for future decline in renal function.
  • The inconsistencies of NOAC prescribing patterns with drug labelling in routine clinical practice should receive greater attention because dose reduction in the absence of a renal indication may reduce treatment effectiveness without providing a greater safety benefit.
 
 
Introduction
Various randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitors, are superior to warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, in terms of efficacy and safety for preventing stroke and systemic thromboembolisms in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).1 2 3 4 The superiority of NOACs compared with warfarin appears to be consistent across ethnic groups, including Asian populations.5 Furthermore, data from two sub-studies of the NOAC trials6 7 and a real-world cohort study8 suggested that NOACs may also be superior to warfarin in terms of maintaining and preserving renal function. A US-based cohort study demonstrated a lower risk of decline in renal function among patients receiving NOACs than among patients receiving warfarin.8 Moreover, findings from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) and RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anti-coagulation Therapy) trials revealed more rapid estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in patients receiving warfarin than in patients receiving rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively.6 7 8 Further studies have demonstrated that warfarin treatment may be associated with more rapid progression of chronic kidney disease and can cause acute kidney injury.8 9 10 This decline in renal function has been attributed to a phenomenon known as ‘warfarin-related nephropathy’, which is associated with vitamin K antagonism and excessive anticoagulation.8 9 11 In contrast, NOACs may offer renovascular protection through pharmacological mechanisms such as the inhibition of thrombin and factor Xa.8 12 13
 
Differences in the pharmacological actions of warfarin and NOACs are reflected in the growing research that suggests NOACs are more effective than warfarin for preserving renal function.8 14 Considering that Asian warfarin users tended to have a lower time in therapeutic range (TTR)15 16 of the international normalised ratio (INR), which is associated with decline in renal function,6 14 the renal effects of NOACs compared with warfarin may differ from the effects in non-Asians. Dosage prescription patterns, such as the frequency of low-dose NOAC prescriptions, also vary between Asian and non-Asian populations14 17 18; this may also affect renal outcomes because the renal effects of NOACs appear to be dose-dependent.14 19 Furthermore, because of differences in NOAC-related bleeding risk between Asian and non-Asian populations, the renal protection effects of NOACs may also vary; major bleeding can cause decline in renal function.5 14 20 21 To our knowledge, there remain limited data comparing NOACs to warfarin in terms of decline in renal function among Asian patients. In this study, we sought to assess the renal outcomes of an ethnic Chinese patient population with NVAF who received NOACs (ie, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) compared with patients who received warfarin.
 
Methods
Study design
This retrospective cohort study included four study groups: warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Each NOAC was compared with warfarin.
 
Study population
Data were extracted from patients’ electronic medical records in the Prince of Wales Hospital of Hong Kong. In total, 2346 consecutive patients with a prescription of warfarin or one of the three NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) in our hospital were screened for eligibility for this analysis. Inclusion criteria were: first began to receive an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016, NVAF, age ≥18 years, minimum on-treatment duration of 3 months, and availability of laboratory data concerning serum creatinine at baseline and during follow-up. We excluded warfarin-experienced or NOAC-experienced patients to minimise confounding bias.8 22 Other exclusion criteria were previous kidney failure, valvular atrial fibrillation,23 and/or other indications for anticoagulation. A pre-study power analysis to detect a 10% difference in the incidence of ≥30% decline in eGFR between NOACs (pooled for consideration as a single unit) and warfarin revealed that the minimum sample size was 200 patients per arm (all NOACs vs warfarin). The sample size in each NOAC group was then matched to the approximate proportion of patients that were prescribed each of the three NOACs in actual clinical practice, in accordance with the preferences of local physicians. In our hospital during the study period, rivaroxaban was available earlier locally and was more frequently prescribed than the other two NOACs; apixaban was the last NOAC to receive local approval and therefore exhibited a lower rate of prescription at the time of the study. This paper adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies.
 
Study endpoints
We studied the three renal outcome endpoints: ≥30% decline in eGFR, doubling of serum creatinine, and kidney failure. Doubling of serum creatinine has been used as a surrogate endpoint when studying the progression of kidney disease in clinical trials.24 Based on the findings of clinical trials and meta-analyses, the National Kidney Foundation and US Food and Drug Administration proposed that with at least 2 to 3 years of follow-up, a 30% to 40% decline in eGFR may also be regarded as a surrogate end point; thus, it has been used as a renal endpoint in previous cohort analyses.8 24 Because doubling of serum creatinine and kidney failure occur late in kidney disease, ≥30% decline in eGFR serves as a more sensitive renal decline endpoint; this change is clinically significant regardless of a low follow-up or event rate.8 24 Kidney failure is defined as eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, long-term kidney dialysis, or kidney transplantation.8 25 Efficacy outcomes were stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or systemic embolism (SE). Based on the initial dose prescribed, the prevalence of dose reduction for each NOAC (apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, dabigatran 75 mg twice daily, and rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily) without a renal indication (eGFR <30 mL/min for apixaban and dabigatran; eGFR <50 mL/min for rivaroxaban) was assessed.26
 
Using the treatment initiation date as our index date, we retrieved the pretreatment creatinine value nearest to the index date as the baseline creatinine; we used this value to calculate the baseline eGFR by means of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.8 27 Hospital electronic records were used to identify co-morbidities and specific drug prescriptions within 3 months prior to the index date. Baseline HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were also recorded. The TTR of patients in the warfarin cohort was calculated as the number of INRs in therapeutic range (INR=2-3) divided by the total INRs recorded for each patient during the analysed period.28 29 Patients were followed up until the end of treatment, death, or when any efficacy or renal endpoint(s) were reached.
 
Statistical analysis
For minimisation of potential confounding, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance identified covariates.8 14 17 30 Generalised boosted models were used to estimate propensity scores and weights for optimal balance across treatment groups.31 32 Weights were obtained to gather estimates representing the mean effects of treatment among treated groups.8 14 Baseline characteristics (eg, patient baseline medications and pre-existing co-morbidities which may affect outcomes) were included in our model (online supplementary Table).8 14 Both CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were not included in the model because they are composite scores derived from other covariates.14 The absolute standardised mean difference was calculated for each NOAC versus warfarin to ensure that the cohorts were sufficiently balanced before comparison of each NOAC to warfarin. An absolute standardised mean difference of <0.2 is considered balanced for each baseline covariate when comparing each NOAC to warfarin.8 31 Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the frequencies of dose reduction without renal indication among NOACs.
 
Because of some extremely high or low weights in our weighted population, we truncated weights at the 1st and 99th percentiles before conducting weighted analysis.8 33 We calculated hazard ratios using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression, then generated weighted Kaplan–Meier curves that compared each NOAC to warfarin. Cumulative incidences for the Kaplan–Meier curves were presented as mean percentage incidences with 95% confidence intervals. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Predefined subgroup analysis was performed for factors potentially associated with renal outcome, including age (≥75 or <75 years); sex; and baseline diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and eGFR (≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or <60 mL/min/1.73 m2).
 
Results
Cohort characteristics
We identified 600 patients with NVAF who were receiving oral anticoagulants: 200, 100, 100, and 200 patients were receiving warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively. After IPTW, all identified baseline characteristics were balanced between warfarin and each NOAC group (Table 1). The mean follow-up duration of the overall study cohort was 1000 ± 436 days. The mean follow-up durations for each NOAC group were as follows: apixaban (790 ± 345 days), dabigatran (1187 ± 322 days), and rivaroxaban (999 ± 430 days); the median follow-up durations were 806, 1416, and 1074 days, respectively. The mean TTR of the warfarin cohort was 44.3%. The frequencies of dose reduction without a renal indication for apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran were 46.9%, 35.7% and 2.0%, respectively (P<0.001 for dabigatran vs both apixaban and rivaroxaban).
 

Table 1. Baseline characteristics after inverse probability of treatment weighting
 
Renal and efficacy outcomes
When the three NOACs were pooled for consideration as a single unit and compared with warfarin, NOAC users exhibited lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR (hazard ratio [HR]=0.339; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.276-0.417; P<0.001) and doubling of serum creatinine (HR=0.550; 95% CI=0.387-0.782; P<0.001). Individual comparisons of each NOAC to warfarin (Table 2) revealed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban users both had lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR (both P<0.001) and doubling of serum creatinine (both P<0.05). However, apixaban users only had a lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR (P<0.001). Despite trends suggestive of lower kidney failure risk in patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban, the overall use of NOACs was not significantly associated with lower kidney failure risk, compared with the use of warfarin. Figure 1 shows the weighted Kaplan–Meier curves for the renal endpoints. For the efficacy outcome, dabigatran was associated with a lower incidence of stroke/SE (HR=0.151; 95% CI=0.054-0.423); P<0.001 vs warfarin), whereas the use of apixaban or rivaroxaban was not significantly associated with a lower incidence of stroke/SE, compared with the use of warfarin (Fig 2).
 

Table 2. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)
 

Figure 1. Cumulative incidences of renal endpoints in patients receiving warfarin and non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). (a-c) Weighted Kaplan–Meier cumulative incidences (%) and 95% confidence intervals at 2 years (2y) and 4 years (4y) using inverse probability treatment weighting. P values when comparing curves for each NOAC to warfarin are shown. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were both associated with lower risk of ≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and doubling of serum creatinine; apixaban was associated with lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR
 

Figure 2. Cumulative incidences of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) in patients receiving warfarin and non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Weighted Kaplan–Meier cumulative incidences (%) and 95% confidence intervals at 2 years (2y) and 4 years (4y) using inverse probability treatment weighting. P values when comparing curves for each NOAC to warfarin are shown. Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE compared with warfarin
 
Subgroup analysis
Analysis of the main renal endpoint, ≥30% decline in eGFR, consistently favoured the use of dabigatran or rivaroxaban, compared with warfarin, across all subgroups (Fig 3). However, the use of apixaban was not associated with a reduced risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR in three subgroups: men (P=0.057), patients with heart failure (P=0.835), and patients without diabetes mellitus (P=0.090).
 

Figure 3. Subgroup analysis for ≥30% decline in eGFR. (a-c) Hazard ratios for predefined subgroups comparing each non–vitamin K oral anticoagulant to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower risk of ≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in all subgroups; apixaban was associated with lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR in most subgroups (with exceptions of patients without diabetes mellitus, patients with heart failure, and male patients)
 
Discussion
Summary and potential mechanisms
Our cohort study provides important insights into the long-term renal impacts of NOACs versus warfarin in an ethnic Chinese population. Decline in renal function was evident among both warfarin and NOAC users in our cohort. However, the use of NOACs was generally associated with better long-term renal outcomes, compared with the use of warfarin, among Chinese patients. The general superiority of NOACs compared with warfarin was most evident for the ≥30% decline in eGFR surrogate endpoint. The use of dabigatran or rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR and doubling of creatinine in the overall population and across predefined demographic and clinical subgroups; in contrast, the use of apixaban was not associated with a lower risk of doubling of serum creatinine in the overall population, nor was it associated with a lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR among several subgroups (men, patients without diabetes mellitus, and patients with heart failure).
 
Pharmacological mechanisms may explain our findings concerning NOAC superiority. Because warfarin is a vitamin K antagonist, it has inhibitory effects on matrix gamma-carboxyglutamic acid, a vitamin K–dependent protein which normally protects against vascular calcification; thus, warfarin administration potentially stimulates and accelerates the calcification of renal vascular tissue, which promotes nephropathy.8 34 35 The mechanism of warfarin-related nephropathy has various contributing factors, such as the occurrence of glomerular haemorrhage and subsequent tubular injury because of red blood cell casts and haem-related free radical injury.10 36 37 Alternatively, NOACs may offer renovascular protection through distinct mechanisms such as the inhibition of thrombin and factor Xa.8 12 13
 
Comparison with existing literature
Our data are generally consistent with previous studies concerning the renal outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin. A study by Yao et al8 regarding the renal outcomes of NOACs showed that dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR, while rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR and doubling of serum creatinine. Analysis of the RE-LY and ROCKET AF trials similarly showed more rapid decline in eGFR among warfarin users, compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban users.6 7 8 Hernandez et al38 demonstrated rivaroxaban superiority for adverse renal events, compared with warfarin, in patients with NVAF who had diabetes mellitus. However, our results for apixaban were inconsistent with the findings of the ARISTOTLE trial, which did not show significant apixaban superiority in terms of renal function preservation; the analysis showed similar but slightly greater decline in eGFR among apixaban users, compared with warfarin users.8 39 Yao et al8 also showed no clear benefits for apixaban, compared with warfarin, in terms of renal protection. Nonetheless, a study in Taiwan by Chan et al14 showed that, compared with warfarin, all three NOACs were associated with lower risk for acute kidney injury in both chronic kidney disease-free and chronic kidney disease cohorts.
 
The differences between our findings and the results of previous studies—especially with respect to apixaban in our cohort versus the ARISTOTLE subanalysis39—may have several explanations. As mentioned by Chan et al,14 Asian populations tended to have lower TTR with warfarin usage, compared with non-Asians15 16; our warfarin cohort had a mean TTR of 44.3%, which was considerably lower than findings in non-Asian populations.15 16 Combined with findings that renal deterioration is greater when warfarin is poorly controlled—especially with INR levels above the target range, as demonstrated in the RE-LY trial6—indicates that Asian populations, such as the Chinese, may have an elevated risk of warfarin-related nephropathy.14 Because Asian patients may be more susceptible to renal decline associated with warfarin use, apixaban may appear superior to warfarin in Asian populations, although this superiority may not persist in non-Asian populations.8 Additional apixaban superiority in Asian populations, as discussed by Chan et al,14 may also be explained by the superior efficacy and safety of NOACs in Asians, compared with non-Asians.5 21 Because major bleeding can be associated with renal function deterioration, the greater efficacy and safety of NOACs in Asians may facilitate renal risk reduction in such populations.5 14 21 Notably, there was a high prevalence of non-guideline dose reduction without a renal indication26 in the apixaban group, compared with other NOACs, in our study; this dose reduction has been associated with worse stroke prevention effectiveness and provides no safety benefit.40 Nonetheless, apixaban was not significantly associated with risk reduction of the other two renal outcomes in our study, compared with warfarin. This may suggest uncertainty concerning its renal risk reduction superiority compared with warfarin. Overall, such inconsistencies across studies indicate the need for additional research; they may also reflect insufficient statistical power in our study to generate more robust conclusions.
 
The aforementioned findings concerning greater risk of warfarin-related nephropathy and possible lower risk of renal decline with NOAC usage in Asian populations are also potentially reflected in the comparatively lower HRs for renal endpoints in our study, compared with the US-based cohort reported by Yao et al.8 When the NOACs were pooled (for consideration as a single unit) and compared with warfarin, HRs for ≥30% decline in eGFR and doubling of serum creatinine were both lower in our population, compared with the pooled results described by Yao et al8 (HR=0.77; 95% CI=0.66-0.89 and HR=0.62; 95% CI=0.40-0.95).
 
Strengths and limitations
Notable strengths of our study were its long study period and subsequent long mean follow-up duration. The longer follow-up duration, compared with previous cohort studies, indicates that previous findings concerning NOAC superiority for renal outcomes also persist during longer follow-up periods. Furthermore, our database comprised each patient’s complete laboratory data; this allowed accurate recording of each renal outcome through serum creatinine and eGFR values, thus enhancing the consistency and preciseness of renal measurement across all patients. We minimised potential confounding by only including patients who were first-time users of oral anticoagulants; this enabled us to balance numerous important baseline characteristics.
 
Regarding limitations, although we utilised IPTW to balance baseline covariates, confounding bias may have persisted in the study.8 14 Nonetheless, we achieved balance concerning the most important identified baseline covariates that may impact renal function across treatment groups. Moreover, although the smaller number of events may have limited the statistical power with respect to the less sensitive endpoint of kidney failure, by including ≥30% decline in eGFR as a sensitive renal outcome, we were able to sufficiently assess early renal decline. Smaller declines in renal function (eg, ≥30% decline in eGFR) serve as valuable and sensitive indicators of renal decline8 that has been regarded as a useful surrogate endpoint for progression to kidney failure24; it is also reportedly associated with risks of end-stage renal disease and mortality.41 Frequency of testing, as mentioned in Yao et al,8 may also affect results; the inclusion of patients with more follow-up creatinine tests leads to greater sensitivity concerning outcome incidence, compared with patients who underwent fewer tests. To minimise the potential impact of this sensitivity on the renal endpoints, we only included patients for whom creatinine tests were available throughout the entire follow-up period; this was possible because all patients were treated in a single centre.
 
Overall, the general consistency of our results with the findings of previous cohort studies, as well as the findings of the RE-LY and ROCKET AF trials, enhances the reliability and robustness of our results.6 7 8 14 Nonetheless, further studies are needed to identify consistencies among the existing discrepancies, especially concerning apixaban. Greater certainty regarding renal outcomes of all NOACs is also important because one previous meta-analysis of various randomised controlled trials concluded that the risk of kidney failure associated with NOACs was similar to the risk associated with other anticoagulants.42 Finally, although this study only involved Hong Kong Chinese patients, whose responses to NOACs and warfarin may differ from the responses of their non-Asian counterparts, the consistency of the results with findings from studies in other regions suggests widespread applicability of the findings.
 
Clinical implications
In patients with NVAF who are receiving oral anticoagulants, gradual renal impairment is associated with worse clinical outcomes.39 43 Our results suggested that patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy, particularly warfarin, should undergo close renal function monitoring. Decline in renal function during anticoagulant therapy may be less likely to occur when receiving NOACs than when receiving warfarin. The NOAC efficacy findings in this study were generally consistent with previously reported data in terms of stroke/SE prevention non-inferiority or superiority, compared with warfarin.44 45 46 47 In particular, the superior efficacy of dabigatran compared with warfarin, in this local study population is reassuring. The inconsistencies of NOAC prescribing patterns with drug labelling in routine clinical practice, particularly regarding apixaban, should receive greater attention, because dose reduction in the absence of a renal indication has been associated with worse effectiveness and no safety benefit in apixaban-treated patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function.40
 
Conclusions
Compared with warfarin, NOAC treatment may be associated with a lower risk of renal decline in Chinese populations; this should be considered by clinicians during the selection of anticoagulant treatment. Further studies are needed in Asian populations (eg, Chinese) to better understand the renal superiority or inferiority of NOACs compared with warfarin. Besides, NOAC-to-NOAC comparisons are needed to inform treatment selection. Additional research is needed in specific populations, such as patients with diabetes mellitus or heart failure, to better understand the impacts of baseline co-morbidities on renal risk reduction related to the use of NOACs, compared with the use of warfarin. Large-scale studies should also investigate how dosage patterns may influence renal outcomes.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: APW Lee.
Acquisition of data: All authors.
Analysis or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: APW Lee.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
APW Lee has received research grants from Bayer, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
 
Funding/support
This work was funded by the Hong Kong SAR Government Health and Medical Research Fund (05160976). The funder had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
The study was approved by The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref CREC 2019.405). Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study.
 
References
1. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:857-67. Crossref
2. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139-51. Crossref
3. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365:883-91. Crossref
4. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365:981-92. Crossref
5. Lip GY, Wang KL, Chiang CE. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: time for a reappraisal. Int J Cardiol 2015;180:246-54. Crossref
6. Böhm M, Ezekowitz MD, Connolly SJ, et al. Changes in renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis from the RE-LY trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2481-93. Crossref
7. Fordyce CB, Hellkamp AS, Lokhnygina Y, et al. On-treatment outcomes in patients with worsening renal function with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin: Insights from ROCKET AF. Circulation 2016;134:37-47. Crossref
8. Yao X, Tangri N, Gersh BJ, et al. Renal outcomes in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2621-32. Crossref
9. Brodsky SV, Nadasdy T, Rovin BH, et al. Warfarin-related nephropathy occurs in patients with and without chronic kidney disease and is associated with an increased mortality rate. Kidney Int 2011;80:181-9. Crossref
10. Brodsky SV, Satoskar A, Chen J, et al. Acute kidney injury during warfarin therapy associated with obstructive tubular red blood cell casts: a report of 9 cases. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;54:1121-6. Crossref
11. Brodsky SV, Collins M, Park E, et al. Warfarin therapy that results in an international normalization ratio above the therapeutic range is associated with accelerated progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract 2010;115:142-6. Crossref
12. Sparkenbaugh EM, Chantrathammachart P, Mickelson J, et al. Differential contribution of FXa and thrombin to vascular inflammation in a mouse model of sickle cell disease. Blood 2014;123:1747-56. Crossref
13. Lee IO, Kratz MT, Schirmer SH, Baumhäkel M, Böhm M. The effects of direct thrombin inhibition with dabigatran on plaque formation and endothelial function in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2012;343:253-7. Crossref
14. Chan YH, Yeh YH, Hsieh MY, et al. The risk of acute kidney injury in Asians treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan. Int J Cardiol 2018;265:83-9. Crossref
15. Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet 2010;376:975-83. Crossref
16. Singer DE, Hellkamp AS, Piccini JP, et al. Impact of global geographic region on time in therapeutic range on warfarin anticoagulant therapy: data from the ROCKET AF clinical trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000067. Crossref
17. Nielsen PB, Skjøth F, Søgaard M, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY, Larsen TB. Effectiveness and safety of reduced dose non- Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2017;356:j510. Crossref
18. Hori M, Matsumoto M, Tanahashi N, et al. Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation–the J-ROCKET AF study. Circ J 2012;76:2104-11. Crossref
19. Ryan M, Ware K, Qamri Z, et al. Warfarin-related nephropathy is the tip of the iceberg: direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran induces glomerular hemorrhage with acute kidney injury in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:2228-34. Crossref
20. Makris K, Spanou L. Acute kidney injury: definition, pathophysiology and clinical phenotypes. Clin Biochem Rev 2016;37:85-98. Crossref
21. Wang KL, Lip GY, Lin SJ, Chiang CE. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: meta-analysis. Stroke 2015;46:2555-61. Crossref
22. Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:915-20. Crossref
23. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:104-32. Crossref
24. Levey AS, Inker LA, Matsushita K, et al. GFR decline as an end point for clinical trials in CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the national kidney foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:821-35. Crossref
25. Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW, et al. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:1-150.
26. Lau YC, Proietti M, Guiducci E, Blann AD, Lip GY. Atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1452-64. Crossref
27. Levey AS, Inker LA, Coresh J. GFR estimation: from physiology to public health. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;63:820-34. Crossref
28. Lam AS, Lee IM, Mak SK, Yan BP, Lee VW. Warfarin control in Hong Kong clinical practice: a single-centre observational study. Hong Kong Med J 2020;26:294-303. Crossref
29. Schmitt L, Speckman J, Ansell J. Quality assessment of anticoagulation dose management: comparative evaluation of measures of time-in-therapeutic range. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2003;15:213-6. Crossref
30. Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2016;353:i3189. Crossref
31. McCaffrey DF, Griffin BA, Almirall D, Slaughter ME, Ramchand R, Burgette LF. A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Stat Med 2013;32:3388-414. Crossref
32. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399-424. Crossref
33. Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 2015;34:3661-79. Crossref
34. Chatrou ML, Winckers K, Hackeng TM, Reutelingsperger CP, Schurgers LJ. Vascular calcification: the price to pay for anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K-antagonists. Blood Rev 2012;26:155-66. Crossref
35. Schurgers LJ, Joosen IA, Laufer EM, et al. Vitamin K-antagonists accelerate atherosclerotic calcification and induce a vulnerable plaque phenotype. PLoS One 2012;7:e43229. Crossref
36. Ozcan A, Ware K, Calomeni E, et al. 5/6 nephrectomy as a validated rat model mimicking human warfarin-related nephropathy. Am J Nephrol 2012;35:356-64. Crossref
37. Ware K, Brodsky P, Satoskar AA, et al. Warfarin-related nephropathy modeled by nephron reduction and excessive anticoagulation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1856-62. Crossref
38. Hernandez AV, Bradley G, Khan M, et al. Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin and renal outcomes in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes. Eur Hear J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2020;6:301-7. Crossref
39. Hijazi Z, Hohnloser SH, Andersson U, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to renal function over time: insights from the ARISTOTLE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2016;1:451-60. Crossref
40. Yao X, Shah ND, Sangaralingham LR, Gersh BJ, Noseworthy PA. Non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2779-90. Crossref
41. Coresh J, Turin TC, Matsushita K, et al. Decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and subsequent risk of end-stage renal disease and mortality. JAMA 2014;311:2518-31. Crossref
42. Caldeira D, Gonçalves N, Pinto FJ, Costa J, Ferreira JJ. Risk of renal failure with the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2015;24:757-64. Crossref
43. Roldán V, Marín F, Fernández H, et al. Renal impairment in a ‘real-life’ cohort of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (implications for thromboembolism and bleeding). Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1159-64. Crossref
44. Li WH, Huang D, Chiang CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin for stroke prevention in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation: the Hong Kong atrial fibrillation project. Clin Cardiol 2017;40:222-9. Crossref
45. Chan YH, See LC, Tu HT, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008150. Crossref
46. Zhang J, Tang J, Cui X, et al. Indirect comparison of novel oral anticoagulants among Asians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the real world setting: a network meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2019;19:182. Crossref
47. Liu X, Huang M, Ye C, Zeng J, Zeng C, Ma J. The role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a PRISMA-compliant article. Medicine 2020;99:e21025. Crossref

Burnout and well-being in young doctors in Hong Kong: a territory-wide cross-sectional survey

Hong Kong Med J 2021 Oct;27(5):330–7  |  Epub 5 Oct 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Burnout and well-being in young doctors in Hong Kong: a territory-wide cross-sectional survey
Kenny YH Kwan, BMBCh (Oxon), FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)1; Loretta WY Chan, MB, BS, FHKAM (Family Medicine)2; PW Cheng, MB, BS, FHKAM (Psychiatry)3; Gilberto KK Leung, MB, BS (Lon), FHKAM (Surgery)4; CS Lau, MB, ChB (Dundee), FHKAM (Medicine)5; for the Young Fellows Chapter of the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Family Medicine, Private Practice
3 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4 Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
5 Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr Kenny YH Kwan (kyhkwan@hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: This territory-wide study evaluated the level of burnout and health status among young doctors in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: All young doctors in Hong Kong, defined as residents-in-training or doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration, were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional survey. This survey used standardised questionnaires including the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) for burnout, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression, and general health questionnaires.
 
Results: In total, 514 doctors completed the survey; 284 were doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration, while 230 were residents-in-training. There were 277 women (54%); among all respondents, the mean age was 33.7 ± 6.1 years. Using a CBI subscale cut-off score of ≥50 (moderate and higher), 72.6% (n=373) of respondents reported personal burnout; 70.6% (n=363) of respondents reported work-related burnout; and 55.4% (n=285) of respondents reported client-related burnout. Furthermore, 24% (n=125) of respondents were “somewhat dissatisfied” with their present job position; 4% (n=19) of respondents were “very dissatisfied” with their present job position. The prevalence of depression among respondents was 21% (n=110).
 
Conclusions: this territory-wide cross-sectional survey of young doctors in Hong Kong, a high prevalence of burnout was identified among young doctors; respondents exhibited a considerable level of depression and substantial dissatisfaction with their current positions. Strategies to address these problems must be formulated to ensure the future well-being of the medical and dental workforce in Hong Kong.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • There is a high prevalence of burnout among young doctors in Hong Kong; of 514 survey respondents, 72.6% reported personal burnout, 70.6% reported work-related burnout, and 55.4% reported client-related burnout.
  • The prevalence of depression among young doctors (21% in this study) was considerably higher than among the general population in Hong Kong (8.4% in a previous study).
  • Overall, 28% of respondents were either “somewhat dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” with their present job position.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Changes to the number of working hours per week and extent of clinical responsibilities may help to reduce burnout among junior doctors.
  • Efforts to promote stronger social networks among junior doctors and their communities may reduce the risk of burnout, although further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.
  • Although the respondents did not indicate reliance on substance or alcohol abuse, there is a need for greater workplace emphasis on positive health and lifestyle behaviours to reduce the risk of burnout among junior doctors.
 
 
Introduction
Burnout among doctors is increasingly recognised as a serious threat to medical and dental practice across all specialties; its prevalence is increasing worldwide.1 Burnout is a spectrum of clinical syndromes that were first categorised into three dimensions by Maslach as emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and a low sense of personal accomplishment.2 Subsequently, it was added to the International Classification of Diseases as a syndrome that results from poorly managed chronic workplace stress.3
 
Burnout among doctors can lead to decreased effectiveness and shortening of professional lifespan.4 Burnout exacerbates negative emotions, thereby impeding cognitive performance; it may result in biased decision making. Hence, the well-being of doctors is important for maintaining manpower, quality of care, and equity of care delivery. Multiple studies in different countries have shown that the incidence of burnout among doctors is rising. In the US, a Medscape nationwide survey showed that 59% of emergency medicine doctors experienced burnout symptoms, and the incidence had increased steadily over time.1 In Australia, the National Mental Health Survey found that the level of very high psychological distress was significantly greater in doctors (3.4%) than in the general population (2.6%) or other professionals (0.7%).5 A cross-sectional online survey in the United Kingdom also revealed a high rate of mental health disorders among junior doctors and medical students.6
 
To our knowledge, studies regarding well-being and burnout among doctors in Asia are limited. Gan et al7 performed a cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Hubei, China; they found a combined prevalence of 2.46% across all three dimensions of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal accomplishment. However, that study only included doctors within a single specialty in one province. Huang et al8 found the prevalences of personal burnout and client-related burnout were 44.0% and 14.8%, respectively, among residents in Taiwan; however, they used a non-standardised questionnaire. In Hong Kong, a previous cross-sectional survey showed that 31.4% of respondents among doctors in the public sector had a high rate of burnout, but the sampling criteria were random and non-specific; moreover, that study did not include a substantial proportion of doctors who worked in the private sector.9 Another survey also suggested that burnout was prevalent among doctors in Hong Kong, but it only included graduates from one medical school in Hong Kong.10
 
Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of burnout in the Hong Kong medical and dental workforce by administering standardised questionnaires to a broad population of residents-in-training and doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration. The study also explored well-being among doctors in terms of job satisfaction, depression, lifestyle behaviours, and factors associated with these states.
 
Methods
Survey and study population
In this study, all doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration registered with the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine, as well as residents-in-training registered with one of the Academy’s 15 constituent Colleges, were invited to complete a voluntary cross-sectional survey between February 2019 and June 2019. The cut-off of 10 years was selected because the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine considers doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration to be “young Fellows”. The survey consisted of self-reported demographic data, year of entry into medical school, and current professional details. Burnout was assessed using the validated Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).11 Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).12 Lifestyle factors were assessed with reference to the respondents’ drinking habits, sleep patterns, and levels of both exercise and activities. Items concerning job satisfaction and lifestyle behaviours were adapted from existing doctor questionnaires and health surveys.13 14
 
An online survey was developed in-house by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Innovative Learning Centre for Medicine of the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine, then administered electronically. The invitations to participate were sent via e-mail; two separate reminder emails were sent after the initial invitation. As an incentive, respondents were offered coffee or food coupons after completion of the survey. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref No: UW 19-062).
 
Sample size calculation
PASS 2000 (NCSS, LLC., Kaysville [UT], US; www.ncss.com) power analysis software was used for sample size calculation. The prevalence of personal burnout among young doctors in Hong Kong was assumed to be similar to the prevalence of personal burnout among residents in Taiwan (44.0%)8; thus, to achieve a 95% confidence interval (CI) with a precision of 4.5%, 458 participants were required. Our final sample of 514 doctors was sufficient to achieve the desired statistical power.
 
Specific instruments
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
This instrument consists of three scales that measure personal burnout, work-related burnout, and client-related burnout; the scales can be applied to workers in all industries and cultures. Personal burnout measures the degree of fatigue experienced by the respondent, irrespective of work experience or occupational status. Work-related burnout measures the degree of fatigue related to work; it explores how the respondent’s perception of work contributes to fatigue. Client-related burnout is the perceived degree of fatigue related to work with clients. The burnout level is calculated as a mean score; therefore, each scale has a value between 0 and 100. A score of ≥50 indicates a high degree of burnout.15 16 17 18
 
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
The PHQ-9 is a depression assessment tool, which scores each of the nine Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria for depression on a scale ranging from “0” (not at all) to “3” (nearly every day). A PHQ-9 score >9 has a reported sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 88% for major depression.19
 
Statistical analysis
The prevalence of burnout is shown using point estimates and 95% CIs. Descriptive statistics were presented concerning demographic characteristics and lifestyle behaviours. Bivariate logistic models were used to describe the distinct relationships of suicide, depression, and burnout with demographic, educational, and professional characteristics. The data were analysed using SPSS software (Windows version 26.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], US). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
 
Results
Participant demographics
There were 746 total respondents; of these, 232 did not complete the entire survey and were excluded from the analysis. Of the included 514 respondents, 284 were doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration, while 230 were residents-in-training. The total number of doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration invited to participate in the survey was 2879; thus, the response rate was estimated as 9.9%. However, it was not possible to calculate the response rate for residents-in-training. The respondents included 277 women (54%); the mean age among all respondents was 33.7 ± 6.1 years. The respondents’ demographic data are summarised in Table 1; their current professional statuses are summarised in Table 2.
 

Table 1. Respondent demographics (n=514)
 

Table 2. Current professional status (n=514)
 
Professional satisfaction
Overall, 24% (n=125) of respondents were “somewhat dissatisfied” with their present job position, while 4% (n=19) of respondents were “very dissatisfied” with their present job position. Furthermore, 15% (n=76) of respondents were “somewhat dissatisfied” with being a medical doctor, whereas 2% (n=10) of respondents were “very dissatisfied” with being a medical doctor. Finally, 3% (n=14) of respondents indicated they planned to stop practising medicine in the next 12 months, with stress or burnout (86%) cited as the most common reason for such plans.
 
Burnout
As measured by the CBI, the mean personal burnout score was 59.6 ± 20.5, work-related burnout score was 57.3 ± 20.1, and client-related burnout score was 49.0 ± 22.3. Using a CBI subscale cut-off score of ≥50 (moderate and higher), 72.6% (n=373, 95% CI=68.5%-76.4%) of respondents reported personal burnout; 70.6% (n=363, 95% CI=66.4%-74.5%) of respondents reported work-related burnout; and 55.4% (n=285, 95% CI=51.0%-59.7%) of respondents reported client-related burnout (Table 3).
 

Table 3. General well-being, depression, and burnout (n=514)
 
Well-being, depression, and suicidal ideation
The mean physical component summary score of the 12-Item Short Form Survey was 49.6 ± 7.8; the mean mental component summary score of the 12-Item Short Form Survey was 42.3 ± 10.6 (Table 3).
 
As measured by the PHQ-9, the mean depression score was 6.2 ± 5.1. However, the prevalence of depression among respondents, defined as a score of ≥10, was 21% (n=110) [Table 3].
 
In total, 79% (n=404) of respondents did not report any suicidal ideation or attempt. The remaining respondents stated that life was “not worth living” or “wished he or she was dead”; some also reported a history of suicidal ideation or attempts. The most commonly cited source of stress in the past year was clinical responsibilities/job demands.
 
Health status
In terms of health conditions, there was a perception among respondents that their health status was “worse” (29%; n=148) or “much worse” (3%; n=17) than among other individuals of the same age. The mean duration of sleep each night was 6.2 ± 1.5 hours. However, most respondents frequently experienced inadequate sleep when at work; 70% (n=361) of respondents indicated that this occurred weekly or more often. In terms of personal habits, the prevalences of alcohol drinking, drug addiction, and smoking were low. However, the prevalences of regular physical activity and personal physical assessments were not high (Table 4).
 

Table 4. Sleeping and other personal habits
 
Association of factors for burnout, depression, and suicide
Logistic regression modelling was performed to investigate bivariate associations of demographic and professional factors with burnout, the presence of depression, or suicide ideation and/or attempts.
 
The number of working hour(s) per week (odds ratio [OR]=1.02; 95% CI=1.01-1.04; P=0.001) was positively associated with depression (online supplementary Table 1); having children (OR=0.58; 95% CI=0.36-0.93; P=0.024) was negatively associated with suicidal ideation/attempts. Doctors who completed a project-based learning curriculum during undergraduate study were less likely to be depressed or report suicidal ideation/attempts (depression: OR=0.60; 95% CI=0.39-0.91; P=0.017; suicidal ideation/attempts: OR=0.65; 95% CI=0.43-1.00; P=0.049) [online supplementary Table 2].
 
Older age (OR=0.97; 95% CI=0.94-0.99; P=0.026), possession of a first university degree in medicine or dental surgery (OR=0.37; 95% CI=0.15-0.89; P=0.027), and possession of Academy fellowship status (OR=0.61; 95% CI=0.41-0.92; P=0.017) were associated with lower likelihood of personal burnout. Engagement in longer working hour(s) per week (OR=1.04; 95% CI=1.02-1.05; P<0.001) and working in Hospital Authority clinics (OR=1.95; 95% CI=1.05-3.62; P=0.034; compared with working in government clinics) were positively associated with personal burnout (online supplementary Table 3). Marital statuses of single, separated, or divorced (OR=1.71; 95% CI=1.16-2.53; P=0.007) and engagement in longer working hour(s) per week (OR=1.03; 95% CI=1.02-1.05; P<0.001) were positively associated with work-related burnout (online supplementary Table 4). Conversely, having children (OR=0.66; 95% CI=0.44-0.98; P=0.038), consultant seniority level (OR=0.27; 95% CI=0.09-0.88; P=0.029; compared with associate consultant seniority level), and working in the private sector (OR=0.40; 95% CI=0.17-0.94; P=0.035; compared with working in government) were negatively associated with work-related burnout. Provision of primary care (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.04-2.16; P=0.031) was associated with client-related burnout (online supplementary Table 5).
 
Discussion
Main findings
This study attempted to quantify well-being and burnout in young doctors (both resident-in-training, and doctors within 10 years of their specialist registration) throughout Hong Kong; there were three main findings. First, the mean burnout score was high in this group of doctors; mean personal and work-related scores of ≥50 were observed on the CBI. Second, there was a high prevalence of job dissatisfaction (28%) in this group of doctors. Third, the self-perceived personal well-being and mental health were worse in this group of doctors than in members of the general population with similar ages.
 
Burnout among doctors in Hong Kong and worldwide
Burnout is a well-known occupational hazard in people-oriented professions; doctors are at particular risk of burnout because of their frequent engagement in intense personal and emotional contact with patients. Although these therapeutic and service relationships are highly rewarding and engaging, they can also be a source of stress. Burnout among doctors has been recognised as a global crisis20; its effects on personal, patient, and institutional levels can be substantial. The expectation to meet job demands can lead to maladaptive practices which will ultimately compromise relationships with patients and colleagues, with long-term consequences on patient care.21 Hence, efforts to acknowledge that such a problem exists represents the first step in establishing a systematic strategy to address this crisis.
 
Although there have been multiple published reports regarding burnout among doctors, territory-wide data focusing on junior doctors in Hong Kong are lacking. Siu et al9 conducted a random sample survey of 226 public doctors in 2012; they found that 31.4% of respondents satisfied the criteria for high burnout. Moreover, young but moderately experienced doctors needing to work shifts were most vulnerable to high burnout. However, the questionnaire used in that study was not comprehensive, the random sampling method did not produce a representative cohort, and only public doctors were invited to the survey. More recently, a more comprehensive survey involving medical graduates of one university in Hong Kong found high prevalences of personal (63.1%) and 55.9% (work-related) burnout using the standardised CBI.10 The more comprehensive survey represents the most comprehensive and robust study in Hong Kong thus far, but it only included graduates from one university in Hong Kong; it did not include any doctors trained elsewhere.
 
The present study of young doctors throughout Hong Kong found high mean personal (59.6 ± 20.5) and work-related (57.3 ± 20.1) scores on the CBI. The mean client-related score was 49.0 ± 22.3, slightly below the score of 50 that constituted the threshold for burnout. These scores were higher than in the previous study performed in Hong Kong by Ng et al,10 which showed mean CBI scores of 57.4 ± 21.4 (personal), 48.9 ± 7.4 (work-related), and 41.5 ± 21.8 (client-related). Moreover, when compared with studies worldwide that used the CBI to measure burnout in doctors,15 16 18 22 the levels of burnout in the present study were among the highest. Contributing factors may differ among regional healthcare systems; causes of burnout and well-being in junior doctors may not be consistent worldwide. Our study attempted to identify sources of stress among junior doctors in Hong Kong; the most commonly cited sources were clinical responsibilities/job demands and professional examinations. Additional in-depth studies are necessary to determine how these factors can be modified to alleviate stress in junior doctors.
 
Health statuses related to burnout risk
The respondents’ general health statuses (in terms of medical conditions) were not substantially worse than the general population, although 32% of the respondents indicated self-perceived health worse than their peers. The present study also showed that the prevalence of depression was 21%, according to the PHQ-9. This is more than double the prevalence previously reported in Hong Kong (8.4%).23 Despite the high prevalence of depression in the present study, respondents indicated low rates of suicidal ideation/attempts. Although a causal relationship could not be established because of the observational nature of the study, the number of working hours per week and having children were factors that affected risk of depression and suicidal ideation/attempts, respectively. The mean number of hours worked per week was 53.5 ± 14.8 hours. Junior doctors who work >55 hours per week are reportedly twofold more likely to have frequent health problems (OR=2.05, 95% CI=1.62-2.59; P<0.001) and suicidal ideation (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.42-2.82; P<0.001).24 A previous systemic review showed an association between long working hours and a depressive state in other professions in general.25 Positive effects of reduced working hours among junior doctors have been found in some studies,26 27 but this relationship is not consistently observed. For example, in the United Kingdom, the Working Time Regulations were fully applied to junior doctors beginning in 2009; these comprised a limit of 48 hours per week, averaged across a reference period of 26 weeks, with additional minimum rest periods. However, implementation of the Working Time Regulations has not fully resolved the effects of long hours and fatigue.28 Furthermore, there are implications for professional training and manpower planning if rigid enforcement of such working hours is performed.
 
Our study did not find any substantial evidence that young doctors were reliant on alcohol, smoking, or drugs as coping mechanisms. This contrasts with findings from the US, which indicated that high levels of alcohol and substance abuse were associated with burnout among doctors.29 It was beyond the scope of the present study to explore other avenues that junior doctors in Hong Kong might use to alleviate their stress levels and burnout. Other health and lifestyle behaviours (eg, exercise levels and personal physical assessments) may be indicative of time constraints related to work or personal obligations; they may also be indicative of self-neglect caused by such constraints and work-related burnout.
 
Limitations
This study had several limitations. First, it was a cross-sectional study with voluntary participation, and the results might not be representative of all doctors throughout public and private sectors in Hong Kong. However, to our knowledge, this study performed the most comprehensive survey regarding burnout among doctors in Hong Kong thus far. Second, the study was not designed to avoid selection bias concerning doctors who were more prone to burnout and therefore more interested to participate in such surveys. Third, because the survey did not allow free text entry in the questionnaire responses, more in-depth analysis was not possible in some instances. Fourth, because this was a cross-sectional survey, no causal relationships or risk factors could be established regarding the development of burnout or depression. Fifth, our definition of “young” was based on the 10 years of specialist registration, which included doctors with various levels of experience and responsibilities; thus, the results might not be representative of a specific subset of doctors.
 
Conclusions
The present study showed that junior doctors in Hong Kong had a high level of burnout, and there was a high prevalence of depression among the respondents. A substantial proportion of the respondents were dissatisfied with their present job position. Future studies to determine causal factors will allow the development and implementation of specific strategies to address these problems within Hong Kong. The maintenance of well-being in junior doctors is vital for sustaining a healthy medical workforce and long-term patient care.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: All authors.
Acquisition of data: KYH Kwan, LWY Chan, PW Cheng.
Analysis or interpretation of data: KYH Kwan, LWY Chan, PW Cheng.
Drafting of the manuscript: KYH Kwan.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors thank all members of the Young Fellows Chapter of the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine for their active participation in this study; the secretariat and staff of the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine and its Hong Kong Jockey Club Innovative Learning Centre for Medicine for their administrative and information technology support; and the Council of the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine for their active support, encouragement, and funding of the coupons. The authors especially thank Dicken CC Chan for statistical assistance.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref No: UW 19-062).
 
References
1. Kane L. Medscape national physician burnout and depression report 2019. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2019-lifestyle-burnout-depression-6011056. Accessed 2 Dec 2020.
2. Maslach C. What have we learned about burnout and health? Psychol Health 2001;16:607-11.Crossref
3. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. QD85 Burnout. Available from: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/129180281. Accessed 3 Dec 2020.
4. Lin M, Battaglioli N, Melamed M, Mott SE, Chung AS, Robinson DW. High prevalence of burnout among US emergency medicine residents: results from the 2017 National Emergency Medicine Wellness Survey. Ann Emerg Med 2019;74:682-90. Crossref
5. BeyondBlue. National Mental Health Survey of Doctors and Medical Students 2019. Available from: https://www.beyondblue.org.au/docs/default-source/beyond-blue-s-strategic-plan-2020-2023/research-project-files/bl1132-report---nmhdmss-full-report_web.pdf?sfvrsn=845cb8e9_14. Accessed 3 Dec 2020.
6. Bhugra D, Sauerteig SO, Bland D, et al. A descriptive study of mental health and wellbeing of doctors and medical students in the UK. Int Rev Psychiatry 2019;31:563-8. Crossref
7. Gan Y, Jiang H, Li L, et al. Prevalence of burnout and associated factors among general practitioners in Hubei, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2019;19:1607. Crossref
8. Huang EC, Pu C, Huang N, Chou YJ. Resident burnout in Taiwan Hospitals—and its relation to physician felt trust from patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2019;118:1438-49. Crossref
9. Siu CF, Yuen SK, Cheung A. Burnout among public doctors in Hong Kong: cross-sectional survey. Hong Kong Med J 2012;18:186-92.
10. Ng AP, Chin WY, Wan EY, Chen J, Lau CS. Prevalence and severity of burnout in Hong Kong doctors up to 20 years post-graduation: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e040178. Crossref
11. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 2005;19:192-207. Crossref
12. Rizzo R, Piccinelli M, Mazzi MA, Bellantuono C, Tansella M. The Personal Health Questionnaire: a new screening instrument for detection of ICD-10 depressive disorders in primary care. Psychol Med 2000;30:831-40. Crossref
13. Heponiemi T, Kouvonen A, Vänskä J, et al. Health, psychosocial factors and retirement intentions among Finnish physicians. Occup Med (Lond) 2008;58:406-12. Crossref
14. Taylor K, Lambert T, Goldacre M. Future career plans of a cohort of senior doctors working in the National Health Service. J R Soc Med 2008;101:182-90. Crossref
15. Benson S, Sammour T, Neuhaus SJ, Findlay B, Hill AG. Burnout in Australasian younger fellows. ANZ J Surg 2009;79:590-7. Crossref
16. Chou LP, Li CY, Hu SC. Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004185. Crossref
17. Creedy DK, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Pallant J, Fenwick J. Prevalence of burnout, depression, anxiety and stress in Australian midwives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:13. Crossref
18. Wright JG, Khetani N, Stephens D. Burnout among faculty physicians in an academic health science centre. Paediatr Child Health 2011;16:409-13. Crossref
19. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-13. Crossref
20. Physician burnout: a global crisis [editorial]. Lancet 2019;394:93. Crossref
21. Graham J, Potts HW, Ramirez AJ. Stress and burnout in doctors. Lancet 2002;360:1975-6. Crossref
22. Thomas LR, Ripp JA, West CP. Charter on physician well-being. JAMA 2018;319:1541-2. Crossref
23. Cheng CM, Cheng M. To validate the Chinese version of the 2Q and PHQ-9 questionnaires in Hong Kong Chinese patients. HK Pract 2007;29:381-90.
24. Petrie K, Crawford J, LaMontagne AD, et al. Working hours, common mental disorder and suicidal ideation among junior doctors in Australia: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2020;10:e033525. Crossref
25. Bannai A, Tamakoshi A. The association between long working hours and health: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014;40:5-18. Crossref
26. Kiernan M, Civetta J, Bartus C, Walsh S. 24 Hours on-call and acute fatigue no longer worsen resident mood under the 80-hour work week regulations. Curr Surg 2006;63:237-41. Crossref
27. Kort KC, Pavone LA, Jensen E, Haque E, Newman N, Kittur D. Resident perceptions of the impact of work-hour restrictions on health care delivery and surgical education: time for transformational change. Surgery 2004;136:861-71. Crossref
28. Morrow G, Burford B, Carter M, Illing J. Have restricted working hours reduced junior doctors' experience of fatigue? A focus group and telephone interview study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004222. Crossref
29. Oreskovich MR, Shanafelt T, Dyrbye LN, et al. The prevalence of substance use disorders in American physicians. Am J Addict 2015;24:30-8. Crossref

Total knee arthroplasty is safe for patients aged ≥80 years in Hong Kong

© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
Total knee arthroplasty is safe for patients aged ≥80 years in Hong Kong
Amy Cheung, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)1; PK Chan, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)1; Henry Fu, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)1; MH Cheung, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)2; Vincent WK Chan, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)1; CH Yan, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)2; KY Chiu, FHKCOS, FHKAM (Orthopaedic Surgery)2
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr Amy Cheung (amyylcheung@ortho.hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficacious operation that improves pain and function in patients with knee arthritis. Because of the population ageing trend in Hong Kong, there is a need to determine the safety profile of TKA in older patients. This study examined the age of patients who underwent TKA in the past 10 years in Hong Kong; the aim was to investigate the mortality safety profile and clinical outcomes of TKA in patients aged ≥80 years.
 
Methods: This study included all patients who underwent primary TKA in the Hospital Authority (HA) from 2010 to 2019. Incidences of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality were established. Clinical outcomes of patients aged ≥80 years in one cluster of HA hospitals were assessed.
 
Results: Between 2010 and 2019, 25 040 TKA procedures were conducted in all HA hospitals; 2491 were conducted in patients aged ≥80 years. The median age at operation was higher during 2015-2019 than during 2010-2014 (70 vs 69 years; P<0.001); furthermore, an increase was observed in the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation. Incidences of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality were 0.156%, 0.35%, and 1.09%, respectively.
 
Conclusions: In this first study to examine the safety profile of TKA in older patients in Hong Kong, the mean age at the time of TKA and proportion of patients aged ≥80 years have steadily risen in the past decade. Even in older patients, TKA is a reasonably safe procedure.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • The total knee arthroplasty (TKA) caseload, mean age of patients, and proportion of patients aged ≥80 years at the time of TKA in Hong Kong has risen steadily in the past 10 years.
  • The overall mortality rate within 1 year after surgery among patients aged ≥80 years at the time of TKA was 1.09%, which is substantially lower than overall mortality rate of the older general population in Hong Kong.
  • TKA is a reasonably safe and efficacious procedure, even in patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Adequate resources should be allocated towards TKA in the near future to meet the increasing needs of the ageing population.
  • When adequate perioperative assessment and management are instituted, older patients should not be advised to avoid TKA for the management of end-stage knee arthritis.
 
 
Introduction
It has been projected that, by year 2036, one in three people in Hong Kong will be aged ≥65 years.1 Because the life expectancy of the Hong Kong population consistently ranks among the highest worldwide, the medical and social needs of older individuals are expected to increase rapidly in the next few decades. The waiting time for joint arthroplasty in Hong Kong’s Hospital Authority (HA) system increased from 33 months in 20102 to 50 months in 20193, reflecting increasing demand for such procedures in our population.
 
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful operation that provides substantial pain relief and functional improvement for patients with end-stage knee arthritis.4 However, in Hong Kong, there is the prevalent belief among many members of the community that older patients, particularly those aged ≥80 years, have a substantial risk of mortality after TKA. Therefore, despite substantial pain and debilitation, older patients have often avoided TKA as treatment for their knee arthritis. However, this avoidance may no longer be a reasonable approach in the era of modern arthroplasty.
 
This study examined the age of patients who underwent TKA in the past 10 years in Hong Kong. The aim of the study was to determine the mortality safety profile and clinical outcomes after TKA in patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation.
 
Methods
All patients who underwent primary TKA between 2010 and 2019 in public hospitals operated by the HA were included in the study. Patient data were extracted from the HA Clinical Data Analyses and Reporting System. Baseline demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex, and diagnosis at the time of operation) were recorded. Patients were stratified according to age (<80 or ≥80 years) at the time of the operation. Incidences of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality after TKA, as well as the incidence of emergency readmission within 28 days after TKA, were calculated.
 
Furthermore, all patients who had undergone TKA between 2010 and 2019 in the HA’s Hong Kong West Cluster of hospitals, who were aged ≥80 years at the time of operation, were identified for inclusion in the study. The Hong Kong West Cluster comprises seven hospitals, providing a total of 3142 beds.3
 
Baseline preoperative parameters, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI),5 as well as the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Knee Society Knee Functional Assessment (KSFA) scores,6 7 were recorded. Rehabilitation outcomes, including KSKS and KSFA scores, were recorded at 1 year after surgery and at the latest follow-up.
 
For data collection and statistical analyses, SPSS (Windows version 26) was used. Age, CCI score, KSKS, and KSFA score were all non-normally distributed, according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Therefore, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the median ages of patients during 2010-2014 and 2015-2019; to compare the median CCI score between older patients who died within 1 year of the operation and patients who survived; and to compare KSKS and KSFA scores before surgery and at 1 year after surgery.
 
Results
Demographics of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2019
Between 2010 and 2019, 25 040 TKA procedures were conducted in all HA hospitals. During the same period, 3835 TKA procedures were conducted in the authors’ hospital cluster. An increasing trend was observed in the number of TKA procedures each year; the yearly caseload in 2019 was more than double the yearly caseload in 2010 (Table, Fig).
 

Table. Total TKA procedures and relevant patient age data for 2010 to 2019 in the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong and in the Hong Kong West Cluster
 

Figure. Distribution of TKA procedures conducted in Hong Kong’s Hospital Authority system according to age-group
 
For all HA hospitals, the mean age (± standard deviation) at the time of operation throughout the study period was 69.4 ± 7.7 years (range, 18-94). Median age at the time of operation significantly increased from 69 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-80) in 2010-2014 to 70 years (IQR, 59-81) in 2015-2019 (P<0.001).
 
An increase in the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation was observed throughout the study period (Table, Fig).
 
Safety of total knee arthroplasty in patients aged ≥80 years
Between 2010 and 2019, 2491 TKA procedures were conducted in all HA hospitals in patients aged ≥80 years. The median age at operation was 82 years (IQR, 80-84). Mortality rates within 30 and 90 days after surgery were 0.156% and 0.35%, respectively. The mortality rate within 1 year after surgery was 1.09%. In total, 5.3% of patients required emergency readmission within 28 days of TKA.
 
During the study period, 22 549 TKA procedures were conducted in all HA hospitals in patients aged <80 years. The mean age (± standard deviation) at operation was 67.9 ± 6.8 years (range, 14-79). Mortality rates at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year after surgery were 0.047%, 0.128%, and 0.441%, respectively. In total, 4.02% of patients required emergency readmission within 28 days after surgery.
 
Between 2010 and 2019, 574 TKA procedures were conducted in patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation in the authors’ HA hospital cluster. The mean age (± standard deviation) at operation was 82.9 ± 2.6 years (range, 80-93).
 
The mean CCI score (± standard deviation) at the time of operation was 4 ± 1.1 (range, 4-11). The CCI score was not significantly different between older patients who died within 1 year after surgery and older patients who survived beyond this time period (median: 5 vs 4; P=0.565).
 
Clinical outcomes in older patients after total knee arthroplasty
The median KSKS improved from 45 before surgery to 94 at 1 year after surgery (P<0.001). The median KSFA scores improved from 45 before surgery to 55 at 1 year after surgery (P<0.001).
 
Discussion
In the past decade in Hong Kong, the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation increased from 8.5% in 2010 to 11.1% in 2019. Moreover, the proportions of patients aged ≥80 years at the time of operation were 9.3% and 10.3% during 2010-2014 and 2015-2019, respectively. These proportions are higher than the values reported by Yan et al,8 who examined the demographics of TKA usage in the preceding decade (ie, 2000-2009) in Hong Kong.
 
In 2019 in Hong Kong, the mean age at the time of operation was 69.9 years; this was similar to the mean ages from studies in the United Kingdom (69 years)9 and Australia (68.5 years)10. Furthermore, the mean age at the time of the operation increased throughout the study period among all patients undergoing TKA in the HA system. This pattern has also been observed in Taiwan,11 but it contrasts with the findings in the United States and Canada, where overall decreases in mean age have been observed.12
 
Overall, the mortality rates among older patients in the present study were similar to those reported in other countries.13 14 However, the mortality rates among older patients undergoing TKA in the present study are higher than the mortality rates reported among patients of all ages undergoing TKA in the HA15 (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.7% at 30 days, 90 days and 1 year, respectively) and in other localities (0.18% within 30 days after surgery).16 Although the mean age of the overall patient cohort was not reported in the study by Lee et al,15 the mean ages of the mortality and non-mortality groups were 78 and 64 years, respectively. These are both substantially lower than the mean age at operation for the older patient group in the present study (82.8 years). Although mortality rates at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year and 5 years after surgery differed between the present study and the study by Lee et al,15 the values were generally comparable.
 
The differences in mortality risk between older and younger patients in the present study are consistent with the findings in a meta-analysis by Kuperman et al,17 who reported increased mortality in older patients after TKA. This is likely related to underlying differences in the inherent mortality risks between older and younger patients caused by age-related increases in the number of medical co-morbidities. In Hong Kong in 2018, the age-specific mortality rates for the general population aged 80 to 84 years were 5.5% and 3.2% for men and women, respectively.18 In the present study, the overall mortality rate within 1 year after surgery for the older patient cohort was 1.09%, substantially lower than the overall mortality rate of the older general population in Hong Kong. This likely reflects the stringent preoperative screening protocol used for older TKA candidates, which is intended to minimise the risk of mortality.13 15 Therefore, with careful perioperative assessment and management, mortality risk after TKA can be minimised, even in older patients.
 
Finally, the present study revealed that both KSKS and KSFA scores were significantly improved at 1 year after TKA, compared with scores before surgery. Therefore, pain, objective physical examination findings, and function in terms of walking and ability to climb stairs can be significantly improved after TKA, even in older patients. Our results support the findings in previous literature.19 20
 
An important limitation of the retrospective study design was that it did not allow us to control for confounding variables, such as differences in surgical expertise and standards of perioperative care among the centres included in this study. However, to our knowledge, this is the only study regarding the incidence of mortality after TKA among older patients in Hong Kong. The results of this study are important for our locality because they describe TKA outcomes from all HA hospitals in the past 10 years in a large cohort of patients.
 
In conclusion, this study showed that the mean age at the time of TKA has steadily risen in the past 10 years, consistent with population ageing trends in Hong Kong. Furthermore, the findings indicate that TKA is a safe and efficacious procedure, even in older patients. Therefore, provided that proper perioperative assessment and management are conducted, advanced age should not be a deterrent for TKA in the management of end-stage knee arthritis among older patients who can substantially benefit from this procedure.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: A Cheung, CH Yan, KY Chiu.
Acquisition of data: A Cheung, PK Chan, H Fu, VWK Chan, MH Cheung.
Analysis or interpretation of data: A Cheung, PK Chan, H Fu, VWK Chan, MH Cheung.
Drafting of the manuscript: A Cheung, PK Chan, KY Chiu.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: A Cheung, CH Yan, KY Chiu.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This research has received approval from the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref UW 20-161).
 
References
1. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Hong Kong population projections for 2017 to 2066. Available from: https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/ media_workers_corner/pc_rm/hkpp2017_2066/index.jsp. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
2. Bureau Food and Health Bureau. Legislative Council Panel on Health Services Improvement on Joint Replacement Surgeries in the Hospital Authority. 2011. Available from: https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr10-11/english/panels/hs/papers/hs0613cb2-1992-3-e.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2020.
3. Hospital Authority website. Available from: https://www.ha.org.hk/visitor/ha_visitor_text_index.asp?Content_ID=221223&Lang=ENG&Dimension=100. Accessed on 24 Sep 2021.
4. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001(388):18-25. Crossref
5. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83. Crossref
6. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(248):13-4. Crossref
7. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1856-64. Crossref
8. Yan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY. Total knee arthroplasty for primary knee osteoarthritis: changing pattern over the past 10 years. Hong Kong Med J 2011;17:20-5.
9. National Joint Registry. National Joint Registry 16th Annual Report 2019. Available from: https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/portals/0/pdfdownloads/njr%2016th%20annual%20report%202019.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2020.
10. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2020 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2020: 1-474. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020. Accessed 21 Sep 2021.
11. Lin FH, Chen HC, Lin C, et al. The increase in total knee replacement surgery in Taiwan: a 15-year retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e11749. Crossref
12. Ravi B, Croxford R, Reichmann WM, Losina E, Katz JN, Hawker GA. The changing demographics of total joint arthroplasty recipients in the United States and Ontario from 2001 to 2007. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26:637-47. Crossref
13. Hunt LP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Clark EM, et al. 45-Day mortality after 467,779 knee replacements for osteoarthritis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: an observational study. Lancet 2014;384:1429-36. Crossref
14. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC. The outcome of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years or more. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:1265-70. Crossref
15. Lee QJ, Mak WP, Wong YC. Mortality following primary total knee replacement in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2016;22:237-41. Crossref
16. Belmont PJ Jr, Goodman GP, Waterman BR, Bader JO, Schoenfeld AJ. Thirty-day postoperative complications and mortality following total knee arthroplasty: incidence and risk factors among a national sample of 15,321 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:20-6. Crossref
17. Kuperman EF, Schweizer M, Joy P, Gu X, Fang MM. The effects of advanced age on primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2016;16:41. Crossref
18. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR. Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics: The mortality trend in Hong Kong, 1986 to 2018. 2019. Available from: https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B71911FB2019XXXXB0100.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2021.
19. Kennedy JW, Johnston L, Cochrane L, Boscainos PJ. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: does age affect pain, function or complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1964-9. Crossref
20. Williams DP, Price AJ, Beard DJ, et al. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:38-44. Crossref

Multicentre study of hospitalised patients with sports- and recreational cycling–related traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong

© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
Multicentre study of hospitalised patients with sports- and recreational cycling–related traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong
Peter YM Woo, MMedSc, FRCS1; Eric Cheung, MRCS1; Fion WY Lau, MB, ChB1; Nancy WS Law, MB, ChB1; Carly KY Mak, MB, ChB1; Peony Tan, BMed MD1; Bertrand Siu, MB, BS1; Anson Wong, MB, ChB1; Calvin HK Mak, MB, BS, FRCS2; KY Chan, FRCS1; KY Yam, FRCS3; KY Pang, FRCS4; YC Po, FRCS5; WM Lui, FRCS6; Danny TM Chan, FRCS7; WS Poon, FRCS, PhD7
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
4 Department of Neurosurgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
5 Department of Neurosurgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong
6 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
7 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr Peter YM Woo (wym307@ha.org.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Cycling is associated with a greater risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) than other recreational activities. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of sports-related TBI in Hong Kong and to examine predictors for recreational cycling-induced intracranial haemorrhage.
 
Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included patients diagnosed with sports-related TBI in public hospitals in Hong Kong from 2015 to 2019. Computed tomography scans were reviewed by an independent assessor. The primary endpoint was traumatic intracranial haemorrhage. The secondary endpoint was an unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at discharge from hospital.
 
Results: In total, 720 patients were hospitalised with sports-related TBI. The most common sport was cycling (59.2%). The crude incidence of cycling-related TBI was 1.1 per 100 000 population. Cyclists were more likely to exhibit intracranial haemorrhage and an unfavourable GOS score, compared with patients who had TBI because of other sports. Although 47% of cyclists had intracranial haemorrhage, only 15% wore a helmet. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors for intracranial haemorrhage were age ≥60 years, antiplatelet medication, moderate or severe TBI, and skull fracture. Among 426 cyclists, 375 (88%) had mild TBI, and helmet wearing was protective against intracranial haemorrhage, regardless of age, antiplatelet medication intake, and mechanism of injury. Of 426 cyclists, 31 (7.3%) had unfavourable outcomes on discharge from hospital.
 
Conclusions: The incidence of sports-related TBI is low in Hong Kong. Although cycling-related head injuries carried greater risks of intracranial haemorrhage and unfavourable outcomes compared with other sports, most cyclists experienced good recovery. Helmet wearing among recreational cyclists with mild TBI was protective against intracranial haemorrhage and skull fracture.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • The incidence of sports-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) is lower in Hong Kong than in other countries or regions; cycling is the sport most frequently associated with TBI.
  • A greater proportion of hospitalised patients with cycling-related TBI had intracranial haemorrhage and unfavourable functional outcomes, compared with patients who had TBI because of other sports. Risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage were older age (>60 years), antiplatelet medication intake, moderate or severe TBI, and skull fracture.
  • Only 15% of hospitalised patients with cycling-related TBI wore a helmet at the time of injury; none of the patients who died had been wearing a helmet.
  • The lack of an independent association with motor vehicle collisions suggests that recreational cycling at comparatively low speeds without protective head gear can be fatal.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Cycling is becoming increasingly popular, but Hong Kong is one of the most dangerous regions in the world for cyclists in terms of fatality rate.
  • Public health policies that improve bicycle rider safety (eg, mandatory helmet legislation) should be deliberated. Although helmet wearing is protective against intracranial haemorrhage for mild TBI individuals, the rate of its adoption is low.
  • Measures to control the risk of sports-related TBI should be carefully considered when designing public health policies to promote sports engagement.
 
 
Introduction
Considerable physical and psychosocial benefits are associated with participation in sporting activities.1 2 Physical activity has been demonstrated to reduce the risks of coronary heart disease, some cancers, obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 3 4 5 6 Its obvious merits have prompted several national health programmes, including the health programme in Hong Kong, to promote sports to the general public.7 8 9 However, sports participation carries a risk of injury, especially traumatic brain injury (TBI). It has been estimated that 20% of all TBIs are sports-related.10 In addition, up to 20% of sports-related TBI survivors (usually adolescents or young adults) experience chronic symptoms including headache, fatigue, and cognitive and balance difficulties.11 There is a global trend of increasing sports-related TBI incidence: from 3.5 to 31.5 per 100 000 population in the past decade.12 13 Because many patients with mild TBI do not seek medical attention, these figures likely underestimate the total burden of this condition.13 Population-based studies reviewing sports-related TBI are sparse; most target specific groups of individuals (eg, professional athletes) or rely on self-reporting surveys that lack a uniform definition and comprehensive assessment of brain injury.14 For similar reasons, studies reviewing outcome predictors have also been inadequate, thus hindering the generation of meaningful conclusions to guide governmental policy initiatives.14
 
Hong Kong is highly urbanised with an established public transport system, such that cycling is mainly regarded as a recreational activity.15 16 In terms of fatality rate, Hong Kong is among the most dangerous areas for cycling, compared with other cities such as New York, the US, or countries such as France.17
 
This study was performed to document the epidemiology of sports-related TBI among patients who required inpatient care by adopting territory-wide uniform diagnostic coding criteria, clear data definitions, and systematic assessments of radiologic findings. Because cycling is a popular sport in Hong Kong, factors predictive of intracranial haemorrhage (eg, the effect of helmet use) and poor functional outcomes among cyclists hospitalised with TBI were determined.
 
Methods
Patients who required inpatient care at any Hospital Authority institution for sports-related TBI from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019 were reviewed. The Hospital Authority is a public health service highly subsidised by the Hong Kong SAR Government; it is responsible for 90% of inpatient bed days in the city. Patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code (ICD-10-CM) designation for TBI 854.0 secondary to a sports-related external cause (E codes: E006-10). Data from clinical records, operation notes, medication prescriptions, and computed tomography (CT) brain scans from a central digital imaging repository were reviewed. In particular, the type of sport played, the clinical presentation of symptoms, the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the need for neurosurgery, length of hospitalisation, and diagnosis of post-concussion syndrome were recorded. Head injury was classified into mild (presenting Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, 14-15); moderate (presenting GCS score, 9-13), and severe (presenting GCS score, 3-8), in accordance with criteria established by the Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.18 Post-concussion syndrome was defined in accordance with ICD-10 criteria. This required a 4-week duration of symptoms from at least three categories following a traumatic loss of consciousness. The symptom categories were headache, irritability, concentration impairment, insomnia, and a preoccupation with the aforementioned symptoms. For neurosurgical patients with cycling related–TBI, the mechanism of injury and their experience level (ie, professional athlete or amateur rider) were documented. All CT scans were reviewed by an independent assessor with 6 months of neurosurgical training experience who was blinded to the patients’ clinical characteristics and outcomes. The scans were first evaluated using the Rotterdam CT score, a commonly utilised validated radiological assessment system for the prognosis of patients with TBI. The classification has four distinct elements that require the appraisal of the degree of basal cistern obliteration, degree of midline shift, the presence (or absence) of an epidural mass lesion, and the presence (or absence) of intraventricular or traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (Table 1). In addition, the scans were assessed for skull fractures, cerebral contusions, and acute subdural haematomas (ASDHs). The primary outcome of the study was the presence of intracranial haemorrhage on the admitting CT scan. All potential predictors were categorised into patient-related, trauma-related, and radiological factors. The secondary outcome was unfavourable functional performance, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 3 to 5 on discharge from the hospital (3, severe disability; 4, persistent vegetative state; and 5, death).
 

Table 1. Rotterdam CT scores for traumatic brain injury
 
Statistical analyses utilised the Chi squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used for categorical data such as patient gender or the use of antiplatelet medication. Independent-samples t test was used for continuous data such as patient age or duration of hospitalisation. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify independent factors for the presence (or absence) of traumatic intracranial haemorrhage. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (Windows version 20.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], US).
 
Results
Overall characteristics of patients with sports-related traumatic brain injury during the study period
In total, 720 consecutive patients were hospitalised with sports-related TBI during the 5-year study period, and 705 (97.9%) of them were admitted under neurosurgical care. This was equivalent to a crude incidence of 1.9 per 100 000 general population. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 32 ± 19 years; 521 (72.4%) patients were adults (≥18 years) and 568 (78.9%) were male. The most common sport was cycling (59.2%), followed by football (21.3%) and basketball (7.5%) [Fig a]. On admission, most (86.1%) patients were fully conscious. Overall, 658 (91.4%) patients had mild TBI, 41 (5.7%) patients had moderate TBI, and 21 (2.9%) patients had severe TBI. Post-traumatic seizures occurred in 36 (5.0%) patients. Furthermore, 324 (45.0%) patients had a loss of consciousness and 269 (37.4%) patients experienced post-traumatic retrograde amnesia. Only 19 (2.6%) patients were taking either antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication. Extracranial injuries were sustained by 208 (28.9%) patients; among them, injuries were mainly either limb abrasions or contusions (62.1%). The median ISS was 2 (interquartile range=2-8).
 

Figure. (a) Sports played among 720 hospitalised patients diagnosed with sports-related traumatic brain injury from 2015 to 2019. (b) Histogram depicting the number of patients with head injury because of cycling (grey bars) compared with those who had head injury because of other sports (white bars), according to age-group
 
Intracranial haemorrhage was noted in 283 (39.3%) patients with TBI; 166 (23.1%) patients exhibited traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage and 157 (21.8%) exhibited ASDH. Skull fractures were detected in 179 (24.9%) patients, with a median Rotterdam CT score of 2 (interquartile range=2-2). In total, 59 (8.2%) patients required neurosurgical intervention; 32 (54.2%) of them had good recovery with a median GOS score of 5 on discharge from the hospital and at 6 months. The mean (± SD) duration of hospitalisation was 5 ± 28 days. Among 307 (42.6%) patients in whom 6-month GOS scores could be assessed, good recovery was observed in 260 (84.7%). Post-concussion syndrome was diagnosed in 30 (6.2%) of 482 patients who attended scheduled follow-up outpatient consultations.
 
Recreational cycling-related traumatic brain injury
The crude incidence of recreational cycling-related TBI requiring hospitalisation was 1.1 per 100 000 population. A comparison was performed between cyclists with sports-related TBI and patients who had TBI because of other sports (Table 2). Cyclists were significantly older (P<0.001) [Table 2; Fig b]. Among 426 cyclists, 306 (71.8%) were male and 120 (28.2%) were female. However, the proportion of patients who were female was significantly higher among those who had TBI because of cycling (28.2%) than among those who had TBI because of other sports (10.9%; P<0.001). Cyclists were likely to exhibit more severe TBI with an almost three-fold greater risk of sustaining extracranial injury (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; 95% CI: 1.9-4.0), resulting in a higher ISS (P<0.001). Of cyclists admitted for head injury, 201 (47.2%) had intracranial haemorrhage, which was radiologically more extensive in terms of the Rotterdam CT score, compared with haemorrhage in non-cyclists (P<0.01). As a consequence, a greater proportion of cyclists had a worse GOS score on discharge from hospital (OR 2.8; 95% CI: 1.3-6.2) and at 6 months (OR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.1-10.5). The cause of death for all cyclists with 30-day mortality was severe TBI with medically refractory intracranial hypertension. Although the overall incidence was low, cyclists also had a greater risk of post-concussion syndrome (OR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.4).
 

Table 2. Comparison of baseline characteristics and outcomes between cyclists and non-cyclists with sports-related traumatic brain injury
 
Predictors for traumatic intracranial haemorrhage and poor functional outcome at discharge from hospital among cyclists
Among the 426 cyclists in this study, 128 (30.0%) experienced bicycle accidents during the weekend; 10 (2.3%) of the cyclists were professional athletes. Most cyclists (273; 64.1%) accidently fell off their bicycle on their own (ie, without colliding into another object) on level ground. Of the injuries, 103 (24.2%) were sustained when the cyclist was traveling downhill; for the 28 patients with records of self-reported velocities, the estimated mean (± SD) velocity at the moment before injury was 40 ± 15 km/h. At the time of injury, 361 (84.7%) cyclists had not been wearing a helmet. Among eight (1.9%) patients who subsequently died, none had been wearing protective head gear.
 
Risk factors for traumatic intracranial haemorrhage among cyclists are shown in Table 3. Univariate analysis identified the following risk factors: age ≥60 years, use of antiplatelet medication, involvement in a motor vehicle collision, presence of moderate to severe TBI, and skull fracture. In univariate analysis, helmet wearing was protective against intracranial haemorrhage. Multivariate logistic regression identified the following independent risk factors: age ≥60 years, antiplatelet medication intake, moderate or severe TBI, and the presence of a skull fracture. Table 4 shows independent significant predictors for unfavourable GOS score on discharge from hospital: age ≥60 years, antiplatelet intake, severe TBI, intracranial haemorrhage, and the need for neurosurgical operative intervention.
 

Table 3. Predictors for traumatic intracranial haemorrhage among cyclists
 

Table 4. Predictors for unfavourable GOS score at discharge from hospital (severe disability, vegetative state, or death) among cyclists with TBI
 
Effect of helmet use among cyclists
As shown in Table 2, 375 (88.0%) hospitalised cyclists had mild TBI, whereas only 36 (8.5%) cyclists had moderate TBI and 15 (3.5%) had severe TBI. No protective effect of helmet use was noted in terms of reducing TBI severity across these GCS-defined categories (Table 3). However, among cyclists with mild TBI, helmets were significantly protective against intracranial haemorrhage and skull fracture, regardless of age, antiplatelet medication intake, or mechanism of injury (Table 5). Although the median Rotterdam CT score was comparable between cyclists with mild TBI who did or did not wear helmets (P=0.68), significantly fewer patients with head protection had epidural haematoma or ASDH. For patients with mild TBI who had intracranial haemorrhage, this difference in radiological factors led to a significantly shorter mean (± SD) duration of hospitalisation for patients who wore helmets (2.6 ± 2.9 days), compared with patients who did not (7.1 ± 11.6 days, P<0.001). However, there was no difference in the need for neurosurgical intervention among patients with mild TBI who had intracranial haemorrhage according to head protection status (P=0.17). Similarly, unfavourable GOS scores on discharge from hospital (P=0.43) and at 6 months (P=0.71) were comparable among patients with mild TBI who had intracranial haemorrhage, regardless of head protection status (Table 5).
 

Table 5. Comparison of baseline characteristics and outcomes between helmet-wearing and non-helmet wearing cyclists hospitalised with mild TBI
 
Discussion
Balancing sports engagement with sports-related traumatic brain injury
The incidence of sports-related TBI in Hong Kong is 2 per 100 000 general population; this is lower than in other countries (eg, the US, Australia, or Italy), where the incidences range from 4 to 32 per 100 000 population.12 The lower incidence in Hong Kong is consistent with a previous finding that Hong Kong residents (especially children and adolescents) have lower physical activity and fitness levels than in other regions, according to a global evidence-based evaluation of such indicators from 49 countries.19 Considering the health benefits of an active lifestyle, there is a clear need to promote sports engagement in Hong Kong. A survey of 5701 residents performed by the Transport Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government estimated that 10% of households had bicycles available for use; moreover, 69% (4 million) of residents aged 15 years or older knew how to ride one.16 In addition, most survey respondents (73%) cycled for recreational or fitness purposes.15
 
Cycling safety outcomes in Hong Kong
Previous epidemiological studies of sports-related brain injuries revealed that cycling was one of the most frequent activities involved.10 12 20 21 In 2019, 1738 road traffic accidents involving cyclists were reported to the Hong Kong Transport Department.22 Half of these accidents (50.6%, 879/1738) occurred in recreational areas such as cycling tracks, parks, or playgrounds; eight (0.5%) patients experienced fatal injuries.22 In the past 10 years, the number of cyclist injuries in Hong Kong has increased by 5.2% per year.17 Compared with other regions worldwide, Hong Kong is one of the most dangerous areas for cycling.17 The fatality rate (per billion minutes cycled) in the city was 34, substantially higher than the rates in Stockholm, Sweden (3), France (4), and other metropolitan areas (eg, New York City [18] and Los Angeles [8]).17 These studies included riders primarily involved in commuting and the causes of death were not elucidated, but they indicate a growing need to enhance the safety of vulnerable road users.
 
To our knowledge, this is the first multicentre study to comprehensively document the outcomes of inpatients with recreational cycling-related TBI using standard assessment criteria. By comparison with patients who had TBI because of other sports, we found that cyclists in Hong Kong exhibited greater risks of more severe injury, intracranial haemorrhage, unfavourable GOS score at discharge from hospital, and post-concussion syndrome. Despite these findings, our results suggest that cycling is generally safe and hospitalised patients had a high (92.7%) likelihood of favourable functional outcomes on discharge from hospital.
 
Single-centre reviews of cycling-related injuries among various suburban districts in Hong Kong found that limb injuries were the most common form of trauma followed by head injury (10%-39% of patients).23 24 25 26 Among patients with TBI, 16% to 53% exhibited “severe” injury; however, the studies did not provide explicit definitions to qualify this categorisation, and did not describe radiological data regarding the extent of injury or the need for neurosurgical intervention.23 26 In the present study, 12% of hospitalised cyclists with head injury had moderate to severe TBI. There was also a high incidence of intracranial haemorrhage involving almost half of the patients. Both these factors were independent predictors of poor GOS score on discharge from hospital. Our results are consistent with the findings in a previous study where 75% of all cycling-related deaths were caused by severe TBI.27 The lack of an independent association with motor vehicle collisions, which constituted only a minority of injuries in this cohort, suggests that recreational cycling at comparatively low speeds can be fatal. Notably, the mechanism of injury for four (50%) of the eight recreational cyclists who died in this study was a loss of balance, followed by a fall on level ground without colliding into another object, person, or motor vehicle.
 
Helmet use: safety and legislative implications
Previous studies in Hong Kong, the most recent of which was performed >10 years ago, revealed that recreational cyclists rarely wore protective headgear (eg, frequencies of 0.2% to 2.2% among emergency department attendees).24 25 26 Our findings revealed that significantly more patients (15%) wore helmets at the time of injury. Governmental advocacy initiatives for promoting helmet wearing in recent years may have resulted in heightened public awareness regarding the risks of head trauma.28 There is little doubt that helmets are protective. In the past 30 years, several case-control and epidemiological studies have delivered compelling evidence to support the efficacy of bicycle helmet wearing in reducing the risk of life-threatening TBI.29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 In a case-control prospective multicentre study of over 3000 patients, Thompson et al33 noted that helmets (irrespective of design) conferred up to a 74% reduction in TBI during accidents. A subsequent meta-analysis of five studies observed that helmets provided a 63% to 88% reduction in the risk of head, brain, and severe TBI for all ages of cyclists; this included equal levels of protection for collisions involving motor vehicles and collisions due to other causes.38 In the present study, helmet wearing did not reduce TBI severity according to our broadly predefined categories. However, among hospitalised recreational cyclists with mild head injury, helmets did provide significant protection against intracranial haemorrhage, including potentially life-threatening epidural haematomas and ASDHs, as well as skull fractures. Thus, our findings may have important public health implications with regard to introducing mandatory bicycle helmet wearing legislation in the city.
 
Whether such laws should exist is a particularly divisive issue among public health experts and interest groups.39 40 41 42 43 In Australia, a nation with all-age helmet wearing safety laws, an overall 46% decline in cyclist fatalities per 1 000 000 population has been reported, compared with the pre-legislation period.44 Similar findings were noted in New Zealand: a 67% decline in severe TBI was recorded after the introduction of helmet laws.45 In the US, a significant reduction in paediatric cyclist fatalities involving motor vehicles was observed in states with such laws.46 A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation revealed that it increased helmet usage, while significantly reducing head injuries and mortality.47 Several medical associations have expressed support for introducing such legislation; these include the World Health Organization, the British Medical Association, the American Medical Association, and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.48 49 50 51 However, critics of such compulsory policies have hypothesised that helmets could encourage risk-compensation behaviour, whereby cyclists may be more willing to engage in potentially injurious risks or for motorists to exercise less caution when encountering them.39 52 53 Other reasons for opposition include infringement on individual liberties; some public health scholars have theorised that such laws could discourage cyclists from participating in gainful physical activity.39 40 41 42 54 From a Hong Kong Transport Department survey (5701 respondents) regarding attitudes towards possible helmet law and enforcement measures, the majority of respondents (78%-90%) were in favour of introducing such legislation, especially when riding on carriageways.16 However, among respondents who knew how to ride a bicycle (3933 respondents), 23% declared they would ride less frequently if mandatory helmet wearing was required.16
 
Limitations
An inherent limitation of a retrospective study of this nature was the likely under-reporting of the number of patients with sports-related head injuries. In the only existing population-based study of TBI epidemiology that included community-based injuries, 95% were considered mild and 28% of respondents did not seek medical attention.55 Among professional or university-level athletes, under-reporting is more apparent: questionnaire surveys reveal that 31% to 78% of respondents neglected to pursue medical care despite experiencing a concussion during the preceding 12 months.56 57 At the emergency department level, no territory-wide TBI registry exists in Hong Kong; moreover, diagnostic coding to facilitate data retrieval is typically not performed after consultations. Therefore, we could only identify hospitalised patients with sports-related TBI by means of an administrative database that utilised the ICD-10 coding system. However, the validity of such administrative data for research has been questioned.58 Studies have shown significantly lower TBI rates among young adults, men, and patients with less severe injuries when the ICD system was utilised, compared with thorough medical record review.59 Analysis of a population-based TBI sample showed that only 19% of individuals were assigned a TBI-related diagnostic ICD code.60 In addition, a degree of selection bias may have existed because some non-hospitalised helmet-wearing cyclists with mild head injury may have been discharged from the emergency department, mitigating the protective effects of helmet use. This may explain why no considerable differences in outcomes were detected for patients with moderate or severely injured patients. Despite the low rate of helmet use among recreational cyclists (15%), significant protective effects were detected among mildly injured patients with regard to intracranial haemorrhage and skull fracture. This limited participant identification approach also allowed for a pragmatic review of patients with clinically significant TBI who were hospitalised following evaluation by an emergency care physician. Computed tomography scans are generally performed only for hospitalised patients with head injury in our public healthcare system; this approach offered an opportunity to evaluate imaging data for intracranial haemorrhage. Because the ICD coding system for traumatic intracranial haemorrhage reportedly has high sensitivity and specificity (both >80%),59 we adopted this coding outcome as the study’s primary endpoint. Another important limitation was the definition of mild TBI, which affected most patients in this study. The definitions offered by several authorities range from conventional GCS-based criteria such as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,61 and the American College of Surgeons62 to additional symptoms of confusion, memory impairment, transient loss of consciousness, and irritability proposed by the World Health Organisation and the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.18 63 64 A better delineation of these symptoms would have enhanced the identification of patients with “high-risk” mild TBI; however, because these relevant symptoms were often not systematically documented in most medical records retrieved in our study, we used GCS-based criteria to reduce the overall rate of underdiagnosis. Using GOS score on discharge from hospital as a secondary study endpoint, we found that only 31 (7%) patients had unfavourable outcomes. Although statistically significant predictors for TBI were identified, the wide confidence intervals for these predictors suggest that the sample size was insufficient to draw robust conclusions. Finally, we could only retrospectively assess GOS score as a fundamental measure of functional outcome. More sensitive instruments (eg, the extended GOS or the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool65 66) might have been better for assessing the psychosocial and cognitive aspects of TBI, considering that a large proportion of mildly injured cyclists had intracranial haemorrhage.
 
Conclusions
The incidence of sports-related TBI in Hong Kong is low and cycling is the most frequently associated activity. Almost half of hospitalised recreational cyclists sustained intracranial haemorrhage. Compared with patients who had head injury because of other sports, cyclists are more likely to experience severe consequences. There is evidence that helmet use offers protection against intracranial haemorrhage and skull fracture among cyclists with mild head injury. Cycling is a safe physical activity, but further legislative measures should be introduced to promote and protect the welfare of individuals enjoying this sport.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: PYM Woo, E Cheung.
Acquisition of data: PYM Woo, E Cheung, FWY Lau, NWS Law, CKY Mak, P Tan, B Siu, A Wong.
Analysis or interpretation of data: PYM Woo, E Cheung, CKY Mak.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Declaration
This research has not been presented or published in any form prior to submission.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Kowloon Central Cluster/Kowloon East Cluster research ethics committee (Ref KCC/KEC-2020-0331). All patients were treated in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from either the patient, next-of-kin, or their legal guardian.
 
References
1. Allender S, Cowburn G, Foster C. Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res 2006;21:826-35. Crossref
2. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 2006;174:801-9. Crossref
3. Batty D, Thune I. Does physical activity prevent cancer? Evidence suggests protection against colon cancer and probably breast cancer. BMJ 2000;321:1424-5. Crossref
4. Batty GD, Lee IM. Physical activity and coronary heart disease. BMJ 2004;328:1089-90. Crossref
5. Aune D, Norat T, Leitzmann M, Tonstad S, Vatten LJ. Physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30:529-42. Crossref
6. Liu X, Zhang D, Liu Y, et al. Dose-response association between physical activity and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Hypertension 2017;69:813-20. Crossref
7. Malm C, Jakobsson J, Isaksson A. Physical activity and sports-real health benefits: a review with insight into the Public Health of Sweden. Sports (Basel) 2019;7:127. Crossref
8. Puckett M, Neri A, Underwood JM, Stewart SL. Nutrition and physical activity strategies for cancer prevention in current national comprehensive cancer control program plans. J Community Health 2016;41:1013-20. Crossref
9. Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Towards 2025: strategy and action plan to prevent and control non-communicable diseases in Hong Kong. 2018 Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/saptowards2025_fullreport_en.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2020.
10. Theadom A, Starkey NJ, Dowell T, et al. Sports-related brain injury in the general population: an epidemiological study. J Sci Med Sport 2014;17:591-6. Crossref
11. Manley G, Gardner AJ, Schneider KJ, et al. A systematic review of potential long-term effects of sport-related concussion. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:969-77. Crossref
12. Theadom A, Mahon S, Hume P, et al. Incidence of sports-related traumatic brain injury of all severities: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology 2020;54:192-9. Crossref
13. Daneshvar DH, Nowinski CJ, McKee AC, Cantu RC. The epidemiology of sport-related concussion. Clin Sports Med 2011;30:1-17. Crossref
14. Selassie AW, Wilson DA, Pickelsimer EE, Voronca DC, Williams NR, Edwards JC. Incidence of sport-related traumatic brain injury and risk factors of severity: a population-based epidemiologic study. Ann Epidemiol 2013;23:750-6. Crossref
15. Transport Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Cycling study. 2004. Available from: https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/publication/cyclingstudy.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2020.
16. Transport Department. Hong Kong SAR Government. Travel Characteristics Survey 2011 Final Report. Available from: https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_4652/tcs2011_eng.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2020.
17. Xu P, Dong N, Wong SC, Huang H. Cyclists injured in traffic crashes in Hong Kong: a call for action. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220785. Crossref
18. Servadei F, Teasdale G, Merry G, Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management. J Neurotrauma 2001;18:657-64. Crossref
19. Huang WY, Wong SH, Sit CH, et al. Results from the Hong Kong’s 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Exerc Sci Fit 2019;17:14-9. Crossref
20. Harris AW, Jones CA, Rowe BH, Voaklander DC. A population-based study of sport and recreation-related head injuries treated in a Canadian health region. J Sci Med Sport 2012;15:298-304. Crossref
21. Beck AJ, Kee J. The epidemiology of sports head injuries in a rural population. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:A20. Crossref
22. Transport Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Road Traffic Accident Statistics. Year 2019. Road traffic accidents involving bicycle by location and severity 2019. Available from: https://www.td.gov.hk/en/road_safety/road_traffic_accident_statistics/2019/index.html. Accessed 9 Aug 2020.
23. Lee LL, Yeung KL, Chan JT, Chen RC. A profile of bicycle-related injuries in Tai Po. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2003;10:81-7.Crossref
24. Yeung JH, Leung CS, Poon WS, Cheung NK, Graham CA, Rainer TH. Bicycle related injuries presenting to a trauma centre in Hong Kong. Injury 2009;40:555-9. Crossref
25. Ng CP, Siu AY, Chung CH. Bicycle-related injuries: a local scene. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2001;8:78-83. Crossref
26. Sze NN, Tsui KL, Wong SC, So FL. Bicycle-related crashes in Hong Kong: is it possible to reduce mortality and severe injury in the metropolitan area? Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2011;18:136-43. Crossref
27. Rivara FP, Thompson DC, Thompson RS. Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury. Inj Prev 1997;3:110-4. Crossref
28. Transport Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Be a smart cyclist. Wear bicycle helmet always. 2020. Available from: https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_4551/221201047_leaflet_a.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2020.
29. Attewell RG, Glase K, McFadden M. Bicycle helmet efficacy: a meta-analysis. Accid Anal Prev 2001;33:345-52. Crossref
30. Maimaris C, Summers CL, Browning C, Palmer CR. Injury patterns in cyclists attending an accident and emergency department: a comparison of helmet wearers and non-wearers. BMJ 1994;308:1537-40. Crossref
31. McDermott FT, Lane JC, Brazenor GA, Debney EA. The effectiveness of bicyclist helmets: a study of 1710 casualties. J Trauma 1993;34:834-44. Crossref
32. Thomas S, Acton C, Nixon J, Battistutta D, Pitt WR, Clark R. Effectiveness of bicycle helmets in preventing head injury in children: case-control study. BMJ 1994;308:173-6. Crossref
33. Thompson DC, Rivara FP, Thompson RS. Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries. A case-control study. JAMA 1996;276:1968-73. Crossref
34. Thompson RS, Rivara FP, Thompson DC. A case-control study of the effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1361-7. Crossref
35. Strotmeyer SJ, Behr C, Fabio A, Gaines BA. Bike helmets prevent pediatric head injury in serious bicycle crashes with motor vehicles. Inj Epidemiol 2020;7(Suppl 1):24. Crossref
36. Sethi M, Heidenberg J, Wall SP, et al. Bicycle helmets are highly protective against traumatic brain injury within a dense urban setting. Injury 2015;46:2483-90. Crossref
37. Persaud N, Coleman E, Zwolakowski D, Lauwers B, Cass D. Nonuse of bicycle helmets and risk of fatal head injury: a proportional mortality, case-control study. CMAJ 2012;184:E921-3. Crossref
38. Thompson DC, Rivara FP, Thompson R. Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;1999(2):CD001855. Crossref
39. Robinson DL. No clear evidence from countries that have enforced the wearing of helmets. BMJ 2006;332:722-5. Crossref
40. Hong Kong Cycling Alliance. Helmets. Available from: http://hkcyclingalliance.org/on-the-road/helmets. Accessed 21 Aug 2020.
41. Bateman-House A. Bikes, helmets, and public health: decision-making when goods collide. Am J Public Health 2014;104:986-92. Crossref
42. Goldacre B, Spiegelhalter D. Bicycle helmets and the law. BMJ 2013;346:f3817. Crossref
43. Rivara FP, Thompson DC, Patterson MQ, Thompson RS. Prevention of bicycle-related injuries: helmets, education, and legislation. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:293-318. Crossref
44. Olivier J, Boufous S, Grzebieta R. The impact of bicycle helmet legislation on cycling fatalities in Australia. Int J Epidemiol 2019;48:1197-203. Crossref
45. Tin Tin S, Woodward A, Ameratunga S. Injuries to pedal cyclists on New Zealand roads, 1988-2007. BMC Public Health 2010;10:655. Crossref
46. Meehan WP 3rd, Lee LK, Fischer CM, Mannix RC. Bicycle helmet laws are associated with a lower fatality rate from bicycle-motor vehicle collisions. J Pediatr 2013;163:726-9. Crossref
47. Macpherson A, Spinks A. Bicycle helmet legislation for the uptake of helmet use and prevention of head injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;2008(3):CD005401. Crossref
48. World Health Organisation. Why are helmets needed? 2006. Available from: https://www.who.int/roadsafety/projects/manuals/helmet_manual/1-Why.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2021.
49. British Medical Association. Healthy transport=healthy lives. 2012. Available from: https://thepep.unece.org/sites/default/files/2017-06/Healthy%20transport%20healthy%20lives%20Britsh%20Medical%20Association.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2021.
50. American Medical Association. Helmets for riders of motorized and non-motorized cycles H-10.964. Available from: https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/bicycle helmets?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-3.xml. Accessed 20 Sep 2021.
51. McDermott FT. Helmet efficacy in the prevention of bicyclist head injuries: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons initiatives in the introduction of compulsory safety helmet wearing in Victoria, Australia. World J Surg 1992;16:379-83. Crossref
52. Gamble T, Walker I. Wearing a bicycle helmet can increase risk taking and sensation seeking in adults. Psychol Sci 2016;27:289-94. Crossref
53. Walker I. Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. Accid Anal Prev 2007;39:417-25. Crossref
54. Hooper C, Spicer J. Liberty or death; don’t tread on me. J Med Ethics 2012;38:338-41. Crossref
55. Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Feigin VL, et al. The spectrum captured: a methodological approach to studying incidence and outcomes of traumatic brain injury on a population level. Neuroepidemiology 2012;38:18-29. Crossref
56. Delaney JS, Lamfookon C, Bloom GA, Al-Kashmiri A, Correa JA. Why university athletes choose not to reveal their concussion symptoms during a practice or game. Clin J Sport Med 2015;25:113-25. Crossref
57. Meehan WP 3rd, Mannix RC, O’Brien MJ, Collins MW. The prevalence of undiagnosed concussions in athletes. Clin J Sport Med 2013;23:339-42. Crossref
58. van Walraven C, Bennett C, Forster AJ. Administrative database research infrequently used validated diagnostic or procedural codes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1054-9. Crossref
59. Carroll CP, Cochran JA, Guse CE, Wang MC. Are we underestimating the burden of traumatic brain injury? Surveillance of severe traumatic brain injury using Centers for Disease Control International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, traumatic brain injury codes. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1064-70. Crossref
60. Barker-Collo S, Theadom A, Jones K, Feigin VL, Kahan M. Accuracy of an International Classification of Diseases Code Surveillance System in the identification of traumatic brain injury. Neuroepidemiology 2016;47:46-52. Crossref
61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Glasgow Coma Scale. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/masstrauma/resources/gcs.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2021.
62. American College of Surgeons. Best practices in the management of traumatic brain injury. Available from: https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/trauma/tqip/tbi_guidelines.ashx. Accessed 20 Sep 2021.
63. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado VG, WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004;(43 Suppl):113-25. Crossref
64. Kay T, Harrington DE, Adams R, et al. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:86-7. Crossref
65. Kean J, Malec JF. Towards a better measure of brain injury outcome: new measures or a new metric? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:1225-8. Crossref
66. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. J Athl Train 2013;48:554-75. Crossref

Effect of SARS and COVID-19 outbreaks on urology practice and training

Hong Kong Med J 2021 Aug;27(4):258–65  |  Epub 26 Feb 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effect of SARS and COVID-19 outbreaks on urology practice and training
CH Yee, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)1,2; HF Wong, MB, ChB1,2; Mandy HM Tam, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)1,3; Steffi KK Yuen, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)1,4; HC Chan, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)5; MH Cheung, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)6; Alan TO Yu, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)7,8; Y Chiu, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)9; NH Chan, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)10; LH Leung, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)11; Ada TL Ng, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)12,13; Denathan MC Law, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)14; TL Ng, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)15; Jeremy YC Teoh, MB, BS, FRCS (Urol)1,2; Peter KF Chiu, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)1,2; CF Ng, MB, ChB, FRCS (Urol)1,2
1 SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
3 Department of Surgery, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Hong Kong
4 Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
5 Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong
6 Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong
7 Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
8 Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong
9 Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong
10 Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
11 Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
12 Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
13 Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
14 Department of Surgery, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong
15 Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr CH Yee (yeechihang@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: The objective was to investigate the changes in urology practice during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a perspective from our experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003.
 
Methods: Institutional data from all urology centres in the Hong Kong public sector during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 Feb 2020–31 Mar 2020) and a non-COVID-19 control period (1 Feb 2019–31 Mar 2019) were acquired. An online anonymous questionnaire was used to gauge the impact of COVID-19 on resident training. The clinical output of tertiary centres was compared with data from the SARS period.
 
Results: The numbers of operating sessions, clinic attendance, cystoscopy sessions, prostate biopsy, and shockwave lithotripsy sessions were reduced by 40.5%, 28.5%, 49.6%, 44.8%, and 38.5%, respectively, across all the centres reviewed. The mean numbers of operating sessions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were 85.1±30.3 and 50.6±25.7, respectively (P=0.005). All centres gave priority to cancer-related surgeries. Benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery (39.1%) and ureteric stone surgery (25.5%) were the most commonly delayed surgeries. The degree of reduction in urology services was less than that during SARS (47.2%, 55.3%, and 70.5% for operating sessions, cystoscopy, and biopsy, respectively). The mean numbers of operations performed by residents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were 75.4±48.0 and 34.9±17.2, respectively (P=0.002).
 
Conclusion: A comprehensive review of urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed changes in every aspect of practice.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • As in other parts of the world, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on urology affected all key aspects of service. However, the degree of impact was less than that during the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic.
  • Urology training was affected by the dramatic reduction in the number of surgeries performed for benign prostatic hyperplasia and urolithiasis.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • A prompt infection control response on the hospital level and heightened public awareness of personal hygiene have reduced the risk of infection among medical personnel to a minimal level.
  • A prioritisation policy of surgeries and services by malignancy alone during pandemics is worth reconsideration. More detailed differentiation of the urgency of interventions is needed to cover the whole spectrum of diseases, from benign to malignant.
 
 
Introduction
In November 2002, there were reports of severe pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Guangdong Province in Southern China, which totalled more than 300 cases by February 2003.1 The disease was spread to Hong Kong in February 2003 through a visitor from southern China, eventually leading to hospital and community outbreaks.2 The World Health Organization (WHO) named the condition severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and issued a global alert and instituted worldwide surveillance on 13 March 2003.3 A novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was identified as the causative agent.4 The epidemic reached its peak in Hong Kong at the end of March 2003, when the disease was spread to the community, and it was eventually brought under control in May 2003. By the end of the epidemic in July 2003, 8096 cases had been reported in 29 countries and regions, with a death toll of 774 (9.6%).5
 
Seventeen years later, a coronavirus took the world by surprise again. At the end of 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unidentified cause were reported in Wuhan, China.6 The first case of similar pneumonia of unknown aetiology outside China was reported in Thailand on 13 January 2020, and subsequently, the disease struck Hong Kong on 23 January 2020. The novel virus is designated as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the standard name of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was announced by the WHO to correspond to the pneumonia caused by this novel coronavirus. On 30 January 2020, the WHO declared a ‘public health emergency of international concern’, and later, on 11 March 2020, COVID-19 was characterised by the WHO as a pandemic.7
 
The impact of COVID-19 affected the whole spectrum of clinical practice, just like it has affected every corner of the world. Although urology does not stand at the forefront of care for patients with COVID-19, every practising urologist has been affected by the global outbreak. Hong Kong is in the unique position of having dealt with two serious coronavirus outbreaks in two decades. The invaluable lessons learnt from SARS in 2003 can help the urology community to face COVID-19 in 2020. The current study aimed to review the territory-wide urology practice in Hong Kong during SARS and COVID-19 from the perspectives of both practising urologists and urology residents in training.
 
Methods
Hong Kong’s healthcare system is divided into a government-run service and a private sector. The public sector dominates secondary and tertiary care, accounting for approximately 80% of all hospital admissions, 90% of total bed-days, and 100% of professional training for doctors.8 The current study focused on a comprehensive review of urology practice in Hong Kong’s public sector.
 
This study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. All 11 urology units in the public sector were included in the review (Table 1). For ease of interpretation, two hospitals were sometimes grouped as a single unit when they provide a comprehensive urology service together. Four areas were investigated to assess the impact of COVID-19 in the urology community: (1) new urology practice strategies introduced; (2) new infection control measures for urologists; (3) training and academic activities; and (4) cross-specialty deployment from urology teams to support COVID-19 frontline staff. With regard to new urology practice strategies and new infection control measures, five aspects of urology services were individually studied: (1) surgery; (2) out-patient clinics; (3) endoscopy; (4) prostate biopsy; and (5) shockwave lithotripsy (SWL).
 

Table 1. Urology centres in Hong Kong
 
After COVID-19 spread to Hong Kong at the end of January, the number of new cases rose steadily. A brief surge was observed in March 2020 due to an increase of imported cases before travel restrictions were implemented.9 Urology service data from 1 February 2020 to 31 March 2020 were collected from all centres in the public sector to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the four previously mentioned areas of urology practice and training. Similar data from 1 February 2019 to 31 March 2019 were captured as a control for comparison. Furthermore, an anonymous online questionnaire was sent to all urology residents to gauge the impact of COVID-19 on training in detail.
 
The Prince of Wales Hospital was at the forefront of the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong in 2003.2 The Hospital’s urology service during SARS (ie, 1 March 2003-30 April 2003) was reviewed using institutional data. A control period from 1 March 2004 to 30 April 2004 was adopted for comparison against the urology practice during SARS. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the demographic data. Continuous variables were described as means, and categorical variables were described as frequencies. Means were compared using t tests with statistical significance set at 5%. The SPSS software package (Windows version 22.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States) was used for analysis.
 
Results
The review covered 11 urology units encompassing the urology practice of 15 hospitals in Hong Kong that serve a population of 7.5 million (Table 1).10 All of the investigated urology units have reduced their numbers of operating sessions (Fig 1). The first hospital began to reduce surgeries on 27 January 2020, only 4 days after the first COVID-19 case was confirmed in Hong Kong. Across all urology units, the mean numbers of operating sessions before the COVID-19 pandemic (1 Feb 2019–31 March 2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 Feb 2020–31 March 2020) were 85.1±30.3 and 50.6±25.7, respectively (P=0.005). All urology units have given priority to cancer or cancer-related surgeries. The most commonly delayed type of surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic was benign prostatic hyperplasia–related surgery, accounting for 39.1% of all delayed cases, followed by ureteric stone surgery (25.5%). In addition, all living-related transplant surgeries were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
 

Figure 1. Disruption of urological surgery because of COVID-19. Outer ring diagram shows the composition of the delayed cases due to COVID-19. Inner rose diagram shows the number of operating sessions in individual urology unit
 
All five aspects of urology services have been reduced in the territory (Fig 2). The numbers of operating sessions, clinic attendance, cystoscopy sessions, prostate biopsies, and SWL cases were reduced by 40.5%, 28.5%, 49.6%, 44.8%, and 38.5%, respectively across all of the reviewed centres.
 

Figure 2. Percentage of urological services maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared with 2019
 
Table 2 summarises the practice changes in the urology units. These included special attention to patients with TOCC (travel, occupation, contact, and cluster history) risk of COVID-19 infection. These patients were either deferred in their hospital attendance or were assessed by a dedicated group of medical personnel so as to achieve efficient use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Teleconsultation was available in one of the centres for urologists to carry out clinical consultations with TOCC-positive patients. Most urologists executed their clinical duties wearing regular surgical masks. Only one urology centre used N95 respirators in clinical practice, specifically for prostate biopsy.
 

Table 2. Changes to urology practice in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
 
A comparison of urology services in Prince of Wales Hospital between the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the SARS period in 2003 is shown in Figure 3. There was less reduction in all aspects during COVID-19 than during SARS (operating sessions: 30.9% vs 47.2%; cystoscopy: 27.7% vs 55.3%; prostate biopsy: 47.6% vs 70.5%; SWL: 13.9% vs 23.6%). The percentage reductions of different urology services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Prince of Wales Hospital were all less than those during the SARS period in 2003. The absolute urology output during SARS actually exceeded that during the 2004 non-SARS normal time in some areas, including flexible cystoscopy and SWL cases.
 

Figure 3. TreeMap of urology services in Prince of Wales Hospital during the SARS epidemic (1 Mar 2003–30 Apr 2003) compared with a comparable non-SARS period (1 Mar 2004–30 Apr 2004), and during the COVID-19 epidemic (1 Feb 2020–31 Mar 2020) compared with a comparable non-COVID-19 period (1 Feb 2019–31 Mar 2019)
 
Training and academic activities were heavily affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (online supplementary Appendix). The survey of urology residents yielded a response rate of 48.5% (16/33). Surgical exposure was significantly hampered, and 53.3% of the respondents had their professional examinations cancelled because of COVID-19, resulting in delays in their acquisition of professional qualifications. Three out of the 11 centres reported having switched some of their academic meetings to online platforms.
 
Discussion
The most obvious impact of COVID-19 on urology practice has been the reduction of different aspects of urology service. The deliberate reduction of various surgeries and out-patient investigation sessions carries a twofold intention. Besides attempting to minimise infection risk via reduction of patient flow in hospital clinical areas, such actions were also a response to the worldwide crisis of PPE shortage.11 By providing limited service, especially with regard to the availability of general anaesthetic sessions for surgery, it is hoped that adequate PPE can be reserved for frontline staff members who have to handle patients with COVID-19.
 
Risk assessment based on quantifiable criteria is essential in the selection of patients whose surgical or investigative procedures are to be deferred. All centres adopted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as a guideline for rearranging prostate biopsy priority. Chiu et al12 demonstrated that a Prostate Health Index cut-off of 35 produced a high-grade prostate cancer detection sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 74%. Its diagnostic performance is superior to that of PSA, PSA density, and free-to–total PSA ratio) among patients with PSA values of 2 to 20 ng/mL. When its usage is more widely accepted by the urology community in practice, it could provide useful guidance in prioritising patients for prostate biopsy when resources are limited.
 
Most centres in the study reserved operating sessions for cancer cases or complicated stones. This is largely in line with the recommendation of Stensland et al13, who suggested that uncomplicated endourology procedures, reconstructive surgeries, transplant surgeries, and andrological interventions be delayed. A similar perspective was endorsed by the European Association of Urology.14 Subcategorisation of urological cancer surgeries is necessary because of the wide spectrum of cancer behaviour within the specialty.13 14 High-grade bladder cancer, advanced kidney cancer, and testicular cancer should take priority for operations, whereas most prostatectomies for prostate cancer should be delayed. In the current review, no differentiation was assigned to hospital policies of prioritising cancer surgery. Delays in interventions for other benign conditions could ultimately increase the risk of complications and unscheduled hospital admissions. Nevo et al15 reported that prolonged stent dwelling time was a risk factor for postoperative sepsis. Prospective assessment is needed to evaluate our current surgery triage protocol.
 
There are still conflicting opinions regarding the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during laparoscopic and robotic surgery. The SARS-CoV-2 virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours,16 but respiratory aerosol-generating procedures seem to have a higher viral content and thus pose a greater risk of transmission than surgical aerosol-generating procedures that aerosolise blood and tissue fluid.17 The EAU Robotic Urology Section recommended that laparoscopic and robotic surgeries proceed with the necessary precautions.18 In all of the centres reviewed in the study, laparoscopic and robotic surgeries were executed with conventional infection control protocols. Thus far, no COVID-19 cases have been reported to be transmitted via laparoscopic or robotic surgery.
 
With respect to the PPE used, regular use of face shields or goggles was not observed in most centres. Evidence so far has shown that besides the respiratory system, SARS-CoV-2 can infect the digestive system and the urinary system, causing the virus to be found in the stool and urine.19 Ling et al20 reported COVID-19 cases in which urine samples remained positive even after throat swabs had converted negative. A similar observation about stool was reported by Chen et al,21 who found that 64.29% of patients tested positive for viral RNA in faeces after pharyngeal swabs turned negative. As asymptomatic COVID-19 patients have been reported,22 and contact with urine and stool during urological procedures is not uncommon, the optimal standard of PPE for urologists needs further consideration.
 
We observe that the surveyed residents’ training and academic activities were affected by the current pandemic. Furthermore, there may be a preference for surgical interventions to be performed by more experienced surgeons so as to reduce the operating time.23 In addition, most of the delayed cases during this COVID-19 pandemic were endourology cases (Fig 1), which account for the main bulk of urology resident training materials. A similar observation was echoed by urology residents in Italy.24
 
The outbreak of SARS in 2003 marked a critical turning point in Hong Kong. Invaluable lessons were learnt, including improvements in infection control measures and more rapid response. The public has perceived face masks as a tool for preventing infection both during the SARS outbreak and in the post-SARS era.25 Lau et al26 reported that 70.7% of the respondents to a survey in Hong Kong would frequently wear masks, 67.3% would avoid going to hospitals, and 71.5% would avoid going to crowded places if a few new SARS cases were reported. Further, healthcare workers have developed good infection control habits (eg, hand hygiene precautions and appropriate PPE selection).8 These elements all contributed to the multi-faceted strategies of different institutions’ urology departments when they were confronted by COVID-19 in 2020. The current study revealed that measures to minimise the infection risk were adopted in the very early phase of COVID-19 emergence. All of the investigated urology centres have reorganised their services to decrease patient flow and reduce the risk of mass gathering. Together with the heightened public awareness of personal hygiene, these factors could assist with containment of infection. Taking Prince of Wales Hospital as an example, the clinical output of minimal services during the COVID-19 pandemic was still higher than that in 2004 during the post-SARS period. This pattern is expected to be similar in other major urology centres in Hong Kong considering the growth in population and service need. However, no hospital outbreaks of COVID-19 have been observed so far in Hong Kong, unlike during SARS, and unlike a number of centres in other parts of the world during COVID-19. The experience of SARS in Hong Kong might have inadvertently prepared medical personnel across all specialties in our locality to face this COVID-19 pandemic with a more timely and comprehensive reaction.
 
A limitation of our study is that we did not investigate behaviour in the private sector. However, the public sector accounts for about 70% of hospital-based services provided in Hong Kong,27 and thus, it is reasonable to interpret the current study as a meaningful representation of urology practice across the whole city during the COVID-19 pandemic.
 
Conclusion
Our study on urology practice reviewed the impact of COVID-19 from a metropolitan-city-wide perspective. The unique experience of the SARS outbreak in 2003 prepared Hong Kong in an unusual way to face the current pandemic of COVID-19. Changes to every aspect of urology practice were observed. Rapid responses from surgical teams in concert with the efforts from different specialties in the medical field have minimised the risk of outbreaks in hospitals and institutions. Prospective studies are needed to review the outcomes of these changes to urology practice.
 
Author contributions
CH Yee and CF Ng contributed to the concept of the study. CH Yee contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the acquisition of data and critical revision for important intellectual content. All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
As editors of the journal, JYC Teoh and CF Ng were not involved in the peer review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution’s Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics board (Ref SBRE-19-563).
 
References
1. Zhong NS, Zheng BJ, Li YM, et al. Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, in February, 2003. Lancet 2003;362:1353-8. Crossref
2. Tomlinson B, Cockram C. SARS: experience at Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong. Lancet 2003;361:1486-7. Crossref
3. Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1977-85. Crossref
4. Peiris JS, Yuen KY, Osterhaus AD, Stöhr K. The severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2431- 41. Crossref
5. Hui DS. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): lessons learnt in Hong Kong. J Thorac Dis 2013;5 Suppl 2:S122-6.
6. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1199-207. Crossref
7. World Health Organization. WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19– 11 March 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.
8. Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government. Report of the strategic review on healthcare manpower planning and professional development. Available from: https://www.fhb.gov.hk/en/press_and_publications/otherinfo/180500_sr/srreport.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.
9. Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong SAR Government. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in HK. Available from: https://chp-dashboard.geodata.gov.hk/covid-19/en.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.
10. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Population. Available from: https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/so20.jsp. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.
11. Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha AK. Critical supply shortages—the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e41. Crossref
12. Chiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, et al. A multicentre evaluation of the role of the prostate health index (PHI) in regions with differing prevalence of prostate cancer: adjustment of PHI reference ranges is needed for European and Asian settings. Eur Urol 2019;75:558-61. Crossref
13. Stensland KD, Morgan TM, Moinzadeh A, et al. Considerations in the triage of urologic surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Urol 2020;77:663-6. Crossref
14. Ribal MJ, Cornford P, Briganti A, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: an organisation-wide collaborative effort to adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines recommendations to the coronavirus disease 2019 era. Eur Urol 2020;78:21-8. Crossref
15. Nevo A, Mano R, Baniel J, Lifshitz DA. Ureteric stent dwelling time: a risk factor for post-ureteroscopy sepsis. BJU Int 2017;120:117-22. Crossref
16. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1564-7. Crossref
17. Cook TM. Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic—a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2020;75:920-7. Crossref
18. Mottrie A. EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) guidelines during COVID-19 emergency. Available from: https://uroweb.org/eau-robotic-urology-section-erusguidelines- during-covid-19-emergency/. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.
19. Ozma MA, Maroufi P, Khodadadi E, et al. Clinical manifestation, diagnosis, prevention and control of SARS-CoV- 2 (COVID-19) during the outbreak period. Infez Med 2020;28:53-65.
20. Ling Y, Xu SB, Lin YX, et al. Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020;133:1039-43. Crossref
21. Chen Y, Chen L, Deng Q, et al. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces of COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol 2020;92:833-40.Crossref
22. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, et al. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. JAMA 2020;323:1406-7. Crossref
23. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Slowdown of urology residents’ learning curve during COVID-19 emergency. BJU Int 2020;125:E15-7. Crossref
24. Amparore D, Claps F, Cacciamani GE, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency training in Italy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020;72:505-9. Crossref
25. Siu JY. Qualitative study on the shifting sociocultural meanings of the facemask in Hong Kong since the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak: implications for infection control in the post-SARS era. Int J Equity Health 2016;15:73. Crossref
26. Lau JT, Yang X, Pang E, Tsui HY, Wong E, Wing YK. SARS-related perceptions in Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:417-24.
27. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Thematic household survey report No. 63. December 2017. Available from: https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11302632017XXXXB0100.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

Impact of appropriate empirical antibiotics on clinical outcomes in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia

Hong Kong Med J 2021 Aug;27(4):247–57  |  Epub 13 Aug 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Impact of appropriate empirical antibiotics on clinical outcomes in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia
MY Man, MB, BS, FHKAM (Medicine); HP Shum, MB, BS, MD; KC Li, MB, ChB; WW Yan, MB, BS, FHKAM (Medicine)
Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr MY Man (mayman729@gmail.com)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Klebsiella pneumoniae infections can cause septic shock, multiorgan failure, and death.
 
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with K pneumoniae bacteraemia treated from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2017. Demographics, microbiology, and outcomes were analysed. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortalities, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and ICU ventilator duration.
 
Results: In total, 984 patients had K pneumoniae bacteraemia; of them, 686 received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Overall, 205 patients required intensive care. Older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.120-2.295; P=0.010), chronic kidney disease (OR=1.81; 95% CI=1.181- 2.785; P=0.007), mechanical ventilation (OR=1.79; 95% CI=1.188-2.681; P=0.005), pneumonia (OR=1.50; 95% CI=1.030-2.187; P=0.034), and carbapenem-resistant or extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL)–producing isolates (OR=12.51; 95% CI=7.886-19.487; P<0.001) were associated with greater risk of inappropriate empirical treatment. Ninety-day mortality was significantly higher among patients with inappropriate empirical treatment; independent predictors included pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR]=2.94; 95% CI=2.271-3.808; P<0.001), gastrointestinal infection (HR=2.77; 95% CI=2.055-3.744; P<0.001), failed empirical antibiotics (HR=2.45; 95% CI=1.928-3.124; P<0.001), older age (HR=1.79; 95% CI=1.356-2.371; P<0.001), solid tumour (HR=1.77; 95% CI=1.401-2.231; P<0.001), carbapenem-resistant or ESBL-producing isolates (HR=1.64; 95% CI=1.170-2.297; P=0.004), patients admitted through the Department of Medicine (HR=1.39; 95% CI=1.076-1.800; P=0.012), and higher total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (HR=1.09; 95% CI=1.058-1.112; P=0.023). Among ICU patients, inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was significantly associated with increased ventilator duration and 90-day mortality.
 
Conclusions: Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia was associated with high 90-day and ICU mortalities; 90-day mortality increased with inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • This large study of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia among patients in Hong Kong and South East Asia showed that 90-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who received inappropriate empirical treatment.
  • Intensive care unit subgroup analysis showed that inappropriate empirical treatment was the strongest predictor of 90-day mortality in critically ill patients.
  • Independent predictors for inappropriate empirical treatment were older age, chronic kidney disease, mechanical ventilation, pneumonia, and either carbapenem resistance or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Extensive efforts are needed to facilitate early, appropriate use of empirical antibiotics, including the use of a current antibiogram, implementation of multidisciplinary sepsis management guidelines, and establishment of protocols among pharmacists, microbiologists, clinicians, and nurses.
  • Careful assessment of empirical antibiotic treatment may be warranted in patients with pneumonia, gastrointestinal infection, failed empirical antibiotics, older age, solid tumour, patients admitted through the Department of Medicine, and/or higher total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
 
 
Introduction
Klebsiella pneumonia causes various clinically important infections. In 2017, K pneumoniae was the third most common isolate in intensive care units (ICUs) and second most common isolate in all patients in the Hong Kong East Cluster.1
 
The emergence of multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae infections is an increasing concern.2 There have been outbreaks of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing strains, carbapenem-resistant (CR) and carbapenemase-producing (CP) strains, and hypervirulent K pneumoniae infections both in Hong Kong and worldwide.2 3 4 In Greece and Italy, CP K pneumoniae comprises 68.3% of all K pneumoniae strains.5
 
The importance of appropriate early empirical antibiotics has been repeatedly emphasised in the management of septic shock by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2016.6 Previously, we highlighted the importance of appropriate early antibiotics for successful patient outcomes.4 To the best of our knowledge, risk factors for receiving inappropriate empirical antibiotics have not yet been explored. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of appropriate empirical antibiotics on outcomes in patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia; we also performed subgroup analysis on ICU patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia.
 
Methods
Study design and data collection
We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia who were admitted to Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital within the period from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2017. Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital is a 1700-bed hospital in Hong Kong which provides extensive services except cardiothoracic surgery, transplant surgery, and burns. Patients were excluded if they were aged <18 years or had incomplete information. Patient medical records were reviewed, as were data in clinical management and clinical information systems (IntelliVue Clinical Information Portfolio; Philips Medical, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The clinical management system is a database that stores patients’ demographics, laboratory results, and drug administration records for all public hospitals in Hong Kong. In the event of missing data, medical records were reviewed manually. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and microbiological data for all included patients were identified from the above databases and medical records.
 
Disease severity was quantified using the maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.7 The following clinical outcome data were investigated: use of invasive organ supports (eg, inotropic use, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapies), ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOSs), ICU ventilator duration, and mortality. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortalities, ICU and hospital LOSs, and ICU ventilator duration.
 
Definitions
Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia was defined as the growth of K pneumoniae in one or more blood cultures. If more than one positive blood culture result was recorded, only the first sample was included. Empirical antibiotic treatment was defined as the antibiotic used within 24 hours after a culture sample was collected. The empirical antibiotic treatment was considered appropriate if at least one of the antibiotic agents was consistent with the in vitro susceptibility results.8 9 10 Community-acquired infection was defined as K pneumoniae identified in patients upon admission or within 48 hours after admission; hospital-acquired infection was defined as K pneumoniae identified in patients at >48 hours after admission.11 Hepatobiliary sepsis comprised liver abscess, cholangitis, and cholecystitis; gastrointestinal sepsis comprised spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, peritonitis caused by bowel perforation, and intra-abdominal abscesses (excluding liver abscess). Medical co-morbidities (eg, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, chronic renal impairment, haematological malignancy and solid tumour) were defined in accordance with the International Classification of Disease coding. Prior steroid use was defined as oral or intravenous steroid consumption within 30 days before the index positive blood culture result. Chemotherapy use was defined as oral or intravenous infusion of biological agents or chemotherapy administered within 30 days before the index positive blood culture result. Any antibiotics usage within 30 days before the index hospital admission was regarded as prior antibiotics usage.
 
Microbiology
Blood cultures were incubated and processed. Blood culture results were considered negative if no positive growth occurred after 5 to 7 days. Susceptibility interpretation was based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria. The ESBL testing was based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute testing criteria12 13 14 15 16 17 18 or the double-disk synergy test described by Jarlier et al.19 Regarding CR K pneumoniae, the isolates were sent to the Public Health Laboratory Centre of Hong Kong if further genetic testing was required to confirm carbapenemase production. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were performed to detect Classes A, B, and D carbapenemase gene targets.
 
Statistical analysis
We compared the characteristics and clinical parameters between patients treated with appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics, as well as between 90-day survivors and non-survivors. Results are expressed as the median ± interquartile range (IQR) or as the number (percentage) of patients, as appropriate.
 
Categorical variables were compared by the Pearson Chi squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate for univariate analysis. Continuous variables were compared by using the Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with P<0.2 in univariate analysis or with clinical significance from previous studies were included in the multivariate analysis. Independent predictors for 90-day mortality were assessed by Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors for receiving appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics. Post hoc analysis was performed for patients with chronic renal failure and resistant organisms.
 
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Windows version 24.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], US) was used to perform statistical analyses.
 
Results
Baseline characteristics
During the 8.5-year study period, we identified 984 patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia; of these, 686 (69.7%) and 298 (30.3%) received appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics, respectively. Table 1 shows the baseline demographics of patients who received appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The median patient age was 75 years (IQR=63-83 years). The most common types of infection were hepatobiliary tract infection (33.1%), urosepsis (24.4%), and respiratory tract infection (18.4%). The overall 90-day mortality was 32.7%, hospital mortality was 22.5%, and median hospital LOS was 10.68 days (5.38-22.81 days, P<0.001).
 

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of adult patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia
 
Appropriateness of empirical antibiotics
Univariate analysis (Table 1) revealed that the risk factors for receiving inappropriate empirical antibiotics were age >65 years (P=0.044), chronic renal impairment (P<0.001), respiratory tract infection (P=0.002), mechanical ventilation (P=0.001), CR or ESBL-producing isolates (both P<0.001), and higher total SOFA score (P=0.048). Hepatobiliary sepsis was associated with a higher rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (P=0.009).
 
Table 2 demonstrates the logistic regression analysis of the predictors for the appropriateness of empirical antibiotics for all patients and ICU subgroup. These include older patients (P=0.010), chronic kidney disease (P=0.007), mechanical ventilation (P=0.005), respiratory tract infection (P=0.034), and either carbapenem resistance or ESBL production (P<0.001). Table 1 shows that the 90-day and hospital mortalities were significantly higher in patients with inappropriate empirical treatment (both P<0.001). Moreover, the hospital LOS was shorter in patients who received inappropriate empirical antibiotics (P<0.001).
 

Table 2. Independent predictors for receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics, according to logistic regression analysis
 
Receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics was associated with higher hospital mortality; this finding was consistent in ICU subgroup (56% vs 23%). The absolute risk increases in mortality associated with the receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics were 18.3% and 33% in ICU subgroup. The number of inappropriate empirical antibiotics associated with each mortality was five in the ICU subgroup and three in all patients.
 
Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections
Antibiograms showing the proportions of non-susceptible K pneumoniae isolates are described in the Online Supplementary Table 1. Twenty (2.0%) patients had CR K pneumoniae bacteraemia, but molecular tests in the Public Health Laboratory Centre of Hong Kong revealed that none of them had CP strains. Overall, 113 (11.5%) patients had ESBL-producing infections.
 
Post hoc analysis revealed that patients with chronic renal failure were more likely to have ESBL infections (18.3% vs 10.5%; P=0.011) and CR infections (0.056% vs 0.015%; P=0.003).
 
Ninety-day mortality
The 90-day all-cause mortalities were 32.7% in all patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia and 34.6% in the ICU subgroup. Univariate analysis (Table 3) showed that 90-day non-survivors were more likely to be aged >65 years (P<0.001), admitted through the Department of Medicine (P<0.001), have septic shock (P=0.005), have a higher total SOFA score (P<0.001), receive inappropriate or no empirical antibiotics (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively), have solid tumour (P<0.001), have respiratory tract infection (P<0.001), be mechanically ventilated (P<0.001), have gastrointestinal infections (P<0.001), and require renal replacement therapy (P=0.044). Patients with diabetes (P=0.001), hepatobiliary sepsis (P<0.001), and urosepsis (P<0.001) had lower 90-day mortalities.
 

Table 3. Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with 90-day mortality
 
Table 4 shows the Cox regression analysis of predictors for 90-day mortality. Independent predictors for increased 90-day mortality were respiratory tract infection (P<0.001), gastrointestinal infection (P<0.001), inappropriate empirical antibiotics (P<0.001), older age (P<0.001), solid tumour (P<0.001), patients admitted through the Department of Medicine (P=0.012), and higher total SOFA score (P<0.001). Patients with diabetes had lower 90-day mortality (P=0.001). The Figure shows the Kaplan–Meier survival plot and according to log rank analysis, the results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in survival among patients who received appropriate empirical antibiotics (P<0.001).
 

Table 4. Independent predictors for increased 90-day mortality according to Cox regression analysis
 

Figure. Kaplan–Meier survival plot showing probability of survival according to receipt of appropriate (dashed line) or inappropriate (solid line) empirical antibiotics
 
Intensive care unit subgroup analysis
Online Supplementary Table 2 shows the demographics for inappropriate empirical antibiotics by logistic regression analysis in ICU subgroup. Overall, 205 (20.8%) patients required intensive care; among them, 148 (72.2%) received appropriate empirical antibiotics, while 57 (27.8%) received inappropriate or no empirical antibiotics. The median patient age was 68 years (IQR=58-78 years). The commonest infection was hepatobiliary infections (42.9%), followed by respiratory tract (23.4%) and urosepsis (14.6%). Furthermore, 82.4% of the patients had septic shock, 33.2% received renal replacement therapy, 60% received mechanical ventilation, and 78.5% had vasopressor use. The ICU and overall 90-day mortalities were 18.5% and 34.6%, respectively. The receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics was significantly associated with higher 90-day mortality (59.6% vs 25.0%; P<0.001), higher ICU mortality (35.1% vs 12.2%; P<0.001), higher hospital mortality (56.1% vs 23.0%; P<0.001), and longer ventilator duration (2 d vs 1 d, P=0.026).
 
Cox regression analysis showed that the receipt of inappropriate or no empirical antibiotics (P<0.001; Table 4) was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia. Other independent predictors were congestive heart failure (P=0.02), admitted through the Department of Medicine (P=0.016), and a higher total SOFA score (P<0.001). Ninety-day non-survivors had longer hospital LOS (P<0.001).
 
Discussion
Appropriateness of empirical antibiotics
Among all patients in this study, 686 (69.7%) received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Furthermore, 148 (72.2%) critically ill patients received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Importantly, 93 (9.5%) patients did not receive any empirical antibiotics. The median hospital LOS for these 93 patients was significantly shorter than the LOS for all patients in the study. We performed event-free survival analysis and found that the LOSs were similar in both groups; these findings suggested that patients who received inappropriate antibiotics had more severe disease and earlier death, leading to a shorter hospital LOS.
 
Micek et al20 found that prior antibiotic exposure was a risk factor for inappropriate empirical therapy. Lautenbach et al21 described a positive correlation between the total cumulative dose of antibiotics and ESBL K pneumoniae infection. In our cohort, prior antibiotics exposure was not significantly correlated with inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment; furthermore, prior antibiotics exposure was not associated with ESBL infections. We examined the presence of prior antibiotics use 30 days prior to positive blood culture results, but information regarding the total cumulative antibiotics exposure in terms of dosing and duration were not available. Other information was unavailable regarding antibiotics prescribed outside hospital settings.
 
Patients with chronic renal failure are reportedly more prone to developing resistant infections.22 They were at greater risk of receiving inappropriate antibiotics. Additionally, hospital-acquired infection has been associated with a higher rate of inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment and higher 90-day mortality.11
 
Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection
The rates of CR and CP K pneumoniae bacteraemia were much lower than the rates reported in other endemic countries.5 A study from Shanghai reported that approximately 22% of all patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia had CR infections; moreover, approximately 59% of the isolates were CR infections in patients who required intensive care.23
 
The prevalence of ESBL K pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong is low.4 The ESBL infection rate in our cohort was 11.5%, similar to previous local studies.1 24 Another study in China demonstrated a much higher rate of ESBL infections (approximately 39%).25 Both ESBL and CR infections were not associated with increased mortality in our study in either the overall patient population or the ICU subgroup. However, ESBL and CR infections were significantly associated with longer hospital LOS.
 
The antibiotics sensitivity in our cohorts was comparable with the antibiogram data in the IMPACT guideline.1 Ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate is recommended as the drug of choice for treatment of K pneumomiae infections in local guidelines.1 In our cohort, more than 80% of K pneumomiae isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate, indicating that it is a reasonable option for broad empirical coverage. Add-on therapy with aminoglycoside improves the coverage of this regimen, because more than 90% of the isolates in our cohort were sensitive to either gentamicin or amikacin. While combination therapy improves the chance of successful empirical therapy, routine use of combination therapy remains controversial.6
 
Ninety-day mortality
The 90-day all-cause mortalities in our study were comparable with the findings in previous studies.24 26 Respiratory tract infections and gastrointestinal infections have consistently been associated with a worse outcome and greater mortality.27 28 In contrast, urosepsis and hepatobiliary sepsis have repeatedly associated with better survival outcomes.29 These sources of infections may be amendable to percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical drainage, allowing more rapid and definitive control of sepsis, which leads to better survival.28
 
A greater proportion of patients with respiratory tract infection did not receive any empirical antibiotics, which might explain the worse outcomes in these patients. The symptoms and signs of respiratory tract infection may overlap with other diseases (eg, heart failure) and treatment may be delayed while waiting for laboratory results and imaging. Given the greater proportion of patients with respiratory tract infections who did not receive any empirical antibiotics, there is a need for early consideration of empirical antibiotics in patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infections.
 
Consistent with the findings of previous studies, we found that older age, solid tumour, and admission through the Department of Medicine were factors associated with higher 90-day mortality.30 31 Patients with these factors were more likely to have other pre-existing co-morbidities, worse premorbid functional status, and be institutionalised. They may also have received a more conservative approach to treatment overall.
 
Diabetes mellitus is well-known to predispose patients to infections, such that affected patients are reportedly 4.4-fold more likely to develop bloodstream infection.32 Similar to the findings by Peralta et al,32 we did not find increased mortality among patients with diabetes. In our cohort, diabetic patients were more likely to had urosepsis than respiratory tract infections. Greater frequency of urosepsis and smaller frequency of respiratory tract infection may have an overall positive effect on survival. Moreover, advances in diabetes care in recent decades (eg, newer generations of medication and integrated multidisciplinary care) have led to neutral effects of diabetes on short-term mortality in patients undergoing major operations and patients with sepsis.34 34 35 Glycaemic status, haemoglobin A1c levels, and diabetes severity were not available in the present study; thus, we could not delineate how diabetes control affected bacteraemia outcomes. Our results are limited to demonstrating that 90-day mortality and diabetes have a greater impact on long-term survival, although this conclusion may not be apparent in the current study.33
 
In addition to mortality, we demonstrated that the inappropriate use of empirical antibiotics was associated with longer ICU ventilator duration, which leads to greater costs and more extensive use of ICU resources. A large retrospective cohort from the US regarding Enterobacteriaceae infections showed that each additional day without appropriate antibiotics was associated with an increased hospital expenditure of US$750 and an increased risk of 30-day readmission.36
 
To the best of our knowledge, the appropriateness of empirical antibiotics has consistently been identified as one of the strongest independent predictors of 90-day mortality in all affected patients and in critically ill patients.37 38 39 Kumar et al8 demonstrated a fivefold increase in mortality among patients with sepsis who received inappropriate initial antibiotics. In this study, we demonstrated a twofold increase in mortality in all patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia, as well as a threefold increase in mortality in critically ill patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia. Furthermore, receipt of inappropriate initial antibiotics was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day mortality in the ICU subgroup. Zilberberg et al40 found that the detrimental effect of inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment could not be corrected despite subsequent targeted antibiotic treatments. A meta-analysis revealed a slower rate of bacterial clearance and increased treatment failure rate when patients were administered inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy.41 Appropriate early antibiotics allow rapid reduction of bacterial load and modulate host defences, thus alleviating some organ dysfunction.42 A more pragmatic approach would be the early administration of broader-spectrum empirical antibiotics and timely de-escalation, according to bacterial sensitivity and the patient’s clinical progression.
 
The chain of sepsis management begins during the first encounter in the Emergency Department and in general hospital wards, rather than in the ICU. Early administration of antibiotics within 3 hours of hospital admission and aggressive sepsis care (beginning in the Emergency Department) can improve survival.42 Another prospective observational study demonstrated that the adequate use of empirical antibiotics prior to ICU admission was the strongest independent factor associated with survival.29 Extensive efforts are needed to facilitate early, appropriate use of empirical antibiotics, including the use of a current antibiogram, implementation of multidisciplinary sepsis management guidelines, and establishment of protocols among pharmacists, microbiologists, clinicians, and nurses.
 
Strengths
To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of K pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong and in the Asia-Pacific region. By including both ICU and general ward patients, we achieved clarity regarding the diverse characteristics of K pneumoniae bacteraemia. We also identified many potential predictors of K pneumoniae bacteraemia–related mortality, based on our extensive literature review and previous publications, then tested these predictors using real-world patient data. By evaluating 90-day mortality, hospital LOS, and ventilator duration, our study more comprehensively evaluated immediate and longer-term complications of bacteraemia; it also provided information for future studies of cost-effectiveness in terms of empirical antibiotics and resource utilisation. Finally, we used the maximum total SOFA score for severity assessment. This score has been repeatedly validated in determining disease severity and predicting mortality in critically ill patients.43 44 45
 
Limitations
This retrospective study was subject to potential confounding factors, including selection bias that could not be completely eliminated from the analysis. Notably, the results of this single-centre study may not be generalisable to other countries with higher CR or CP K pneumoniae infections. Furthermore, this study encompassed a long duration, in which the definitions of sepsis or septic shock might have changed.45 The care of patients with sepsis evolved over time, including advances in source control by percutaneous and endoscopic means that potentially improved patient survival. Nonetheless, the role of empirical antibiotics in patients with sepsis remains an essential sepsis consideration.
 
Antibiotic pharmacodynamics also has a fundamental role in bacteraemia treatment. In this study, we could not collect information regarding the timing of first-dose antibiotics, time to appropriate antibiotics, duration of antibiotics, or time to surgical treatments. Moreover, antibiotic stewardship and therapeutic de-escalation efforts, as well as their impacts on patient outcomes, were not assessed in the present study. Future studies may be needed concerning the prolonged infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics, use of combination therapies, duration of antibiotics, and serum monitoring of antibiotics.
 
Conclusion
The receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics led to twofold greater 90-day mortality in patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia. In critically ill patients, inappropriate use of empirical antibiotics was the strongest independent predictor of mortality. Early identification of high-risk patients and administration of appropriate empirical antibiotics can improve patient outcomes.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: MY Man, HP Shum.
Acquisition of data: MY Man, HP Shum.
Analysis or interpretation of data: MY Man, HP Shum.
Drafting of the manuscript: MY Man.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: WW Yan.
 
All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Declaration
This research was presented by KC Li as an abstract at the 31st Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), 21-24 October 2018, Paris, France.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Hong Kong Easter Cluster Ethics Committee of the Hospital Authority (HKECREC-2018-018). The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.
 
References
1. Ho PL, Wu TC, Chao DV, et al, editors. Reducing bacterial resistance with IMPACT. Interhospital multi-disciplinary programme on antimicrobial chemotherapy. 5th edition. 2017. Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/reducing_bacterial_resistance_with_impact.pdf. Accessed 7 Jun 2020.
2. Ben-David D, Kordevani R, Keller N, et al. Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:54-60. Crossref
3. Wong MH, Shum HP, Chen JH, et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:24. Crossref
4. Man MY, Shum HP, Chan YH, et al. Clinical predictors and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect 2017;97:35-41.Crossref
5. Alicino C, Giacobbe DR, Orsi A, et al. Trends in the annual incidence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: a 8-year retrospective study in a large teaching hospital in northern Italy. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:415. Crossref
6. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304-77.Crossref
7. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 2001;286:1754-8. Crossref
8. Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest 2009;136:1237-48. Crossref
9. Vazquez-Guillamet C, Scolari M, Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Kollef M. Using the number needed to treat to assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as a determinant of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2014;42:2342-9. Crossref
10. Micek ST, Welch EC, Khan J, et al. Empiric combination antibiotic therapy is associated with improved outcome against sepsis due to Gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:1742-8. Crossref
11. Juan CH, Chuang C, Chen CH, Li L, Lin YT. Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and capsular types of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019;8:1. Crossref
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S16 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Sixteenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2006.
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S17 Performance Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Seventeenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2007.
14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S19 Performance Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Nineteenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2009.
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S20 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twentieth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2010.
16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S23 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Third Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2013.
17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S25 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2015.
18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S26 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Sixth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2016.
19. Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis 1988;10:867-78. Crossref
20. Micek ST, Hampton N, Kollef M. Risk factors and outcomes for ineffective empiric treatment of sepsis caused by Gram-negative pathogens: stratification by onset of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;62:e01577-17.
21. Lautenbach E, Patel JB, Bilker WB, Edelstein PH, Fishman NO. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1162-71. Crossref
22. Eilertson B, Cober E, Richter SS, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in patients on renal replacement therapy. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:ofx216.
23. Tian L, Tan R, Chen Y, et al. Epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in a teaching hospital: factors related to the carbapenem resistance and patient mortality. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:48. Crossref
24. Pau CK, Ma FF, Ip M, You JH. Characteristics and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015;47:283-8. Crossref
25. Li L, Huang H. Risk factors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumonia: a singlecenter retrospective study in China. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7924.
26. Melot B, Colot J, Guerrier G. Bacteremic community-acquired infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae: clinical and microbiological presentation in New Caledonia, 2008-2013. Int J Infect Dis 2015;41:29-31. Crossref
27. Russo A, Falcone M, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018;52:577-85.Crossref
28. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Vazquez-Guillamet C, Kollef MH. Multi-drug resistance, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and mortality in Gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care 2014;18:596. Crossref
29. Garnacho-Montero J, Gutiérrez-Pizarraya A, Escoresca-Ortega A, Fernández-Delgado E, López-Sánchez JM. Adequate antibiotic therapy prior to ICU admission in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock reduces hospital mortality. Crit Care 2015;19:302. Crossref
30. Antonio M, Gudiol C, Royo-Cebrecos C, Grillo S, Ardanuy C, Carratalà J. Current etiology, clinical features and outcomes of bacteremia in older patients with solid tumors. J Geriatr Oncol 2019;10:246-51. Crossref
31. Tseng CP, Wu HS, Wu TH, Lin YT, Fung CP. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with community-onset Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia requiring intensive care. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2013;46:217-23. Crossref
32. Peralta G, Sánchez MB, Roiz MP, Garrido JC, Teira R, Mateos F. Diabetes does not affect outcome in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:94. Crossref
33. Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, Mechanick JI, Sharma SK, Adams DH. Diabetes is not a risk factor for hospital mortality following contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:753-8. Crossref
34. Teo BJ, Chong HC, Yeo W, Tan AH. The impact of diabetes on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in an Asian population. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3186-9. Crossref
35. Stegenga ME, Vincent JL, Vail GM, et al. Diabetes does not alter mortality or hemostatic and inflammatory responses in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2010;38:539-45. Crossref
36. Zilberberg MD, Nathanson BH, Sulham K, Fan W, Shorr AF. 30-day readmission, antibiotics costs and costs of delay to adequate treatment of Enterobacteriaceae UTI, pneumonia, and sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2017;6:124. Crossref
37. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Salamanca E, de Cueto M, et al. Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:726-34. Crossref
38. Cheng WL, Hsueh PR, Lee CC, et al. Bacteremic pneumonia caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: appropriateness of empirical treatment matters. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2016;49:208-15. Crossref
39. Kohler PP, Volling C, Green K, Uleryk EM, Shah PS, McGeer A. Carbapenem resistance, initial antibiotic therapy, and mortality in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1319-28. Crossref
40. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Mody SH, Kollef MH. Antimicrobial therapy escalation and hospital mortality among patients with health-care-associated pneumonia: a single-center experience. Chest 2008;134:963-8. Crossref
41. Raman G, Avendano E, Berger S, Menon V. Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-negative infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:395. Crossref
42. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2235-44. Crossref
43. Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:686-96. Crossref
44. Minne L, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care 2008;12:R161.
45. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. Crossref

Impact of appropriate empirical antibiotics on clinical outcomes in <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> bacteraemia

Hong Kong Med J 2021;27:Epub 13 Aug 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Impact of appropriate empirical antibiotics on clinical outcomes in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia
MY Man, MB, BS, FHKAM (Medicine); HP Shum, MB, BS, MD; KC Li, MB, ChB; WW Yan, MB, BS, FHKAM (Medicine)
Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr MY Man (mayman729@gmail.com)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Klebsiella pneumoniae infections can cause septic shock, multiorgan failure, and death.
 
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with K pneumoniae bacteraemia treated from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2017. Demographics, microbiology, and outcomes were analysed. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortalities, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and ICU ventilator duration.
 
Results: In total, 984 patients had K pneumoniae bacteraemia; of them, 686 received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Overall, 205 patients required intensive care. Older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.120-2.295; P=0.010), chronic kidney disease (OR=1.81; 95% CI=1.181- 2.785; P=0.007), mechanical ventilation (OR=1.79; 95% CI=1.188-2.681; P=0.005), pneumonia (OR=1.50; 95% CI=1.030-2.187; P=0.034), and carbapenem-resistant or extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL)–producing isolates (OR=12.51; 95% CI=7.886-19.487; P<0.001) were associated with greater risk of inappropriate empirical treatment. Ninety-day mortality was significantly higher among patients with inappropriate empirical treatment; independent predictors included pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR]=2.94; 95% CI=2.271-3.808; P<0.001), gastrointestinal infection (HR=2.77; 95% CI=2.055-3.744; P<0.001), failed empirical antibiotics (HR=2.45; 95% CI=1.928-3.124; P<0.001), older age (HR=1.79; 95% CI=1.356-2.371; P<0.001), solid tumour (HR=1.77; 95% CI=1.401-2.231; P<0.001), carbapenem-resistant or ESBL-producing isolates (HR=1.64; 95% CI=1.170-2.297; P=0.004), patients admitted through the Department of Medicine (HR=1.39; 95% CI=1.076-1.800; P=0.012), and higher total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (HR=1.09; 95% CI=1.058-1.112; P=0.023). Among ICU patients, inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was significantly associated with increased ventilator duration and 90-day mortality.
 
Conclusions: Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia was associated with high 90-day and ICU mortalities; 90-day mortality increased with inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • This large study of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia among patients in Hong Kong and South East Asia showed that 90-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who received inappropriate empirical treatment.
  • Intensive care unit subgroup analysis showed that inappropriate empirical treatment was the strongest predictor of 90-day mortality in critically ill patients.
  • Independent predictors for inappropriate empirical treatment were older age, chronic kidney disease, mechanical ventilation, pneumonia, and either carbapenem resistance or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Extensive efforts are needed to facilitate early, appropriate use of empirical antibiotics, including the use of a current antibiogram, implementation of multidisciplinary sepsis management guidelines, and establishment of protocols among pharmacists, microbiologists, clinicians, and nurses.
  • Careful assessment of empirical antibiotic treatment may be warranted in patients with pneumonia, gastrointestinal infection, failed empirical antibiotics, older age, solid tumour, patients admitted through the Department of Medicine, and/or higher total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
 
 
Introduction
Klebsiella pneumonia causes various clinically important infections. In 2017, K pneumoniae was the third most common isolate in intensive care units (ICUs) and second most common isolate in all patients in the Hong Kong East Cluster.1
 
The emergence of multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae infections is an increasing concern.2 There have been outbreaks of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing strains, carbapenem-resistant (CR) and carbapenemase-producing (CP) strains, and hypervirulent K pneumoniae infections both in Hong Kong and worldwide.2 3 4 In Greece and Italy, CP K pneumoniae comprises 68.3% of all K pneumoniae strains.5
 
The importance of appropriate early empirical antibiotics has been repeatedly emphasised in the management of septic shock by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2016.6 Previously, we highlighted the importance of appropriate early antibiotics for successful patient outcomes.4 To the best of our knowledge, risk factors for receiving inappropriate empirical antibiotics have not yet been explored. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of appropriate empirical antibiotics on outcomes in patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia; we also performed subgroup analysis on ICU patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia.
 
Methods
Study design and data collection
We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia who were admitted to Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital within the period from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2017. Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital is a 1700-bed hospital in Hong Kong which provides extensive services except cardiothoracic surgery, transplant surgery, and burns. Patients were excluded if they were aged <18 years or had incomplete information. Patient medical records were reviewed, as were data in clinical management and clinical information systems (IntelliVue Clinical Information Portfolio; Philips Medical, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The clinical management system is a database that stores patients’ demographics, laboratory results, and drug administration records for all public hospitals in Hong Kong. In the event of missing data, medical records were reviewed manually. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and microbiological data for all included patients were identified from the above databases and medical records.
 
Disease severity was quantified using the maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.7 The following clinical outcome data were investigated: use of invasive organ supports (eg, inotropic use, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapies), ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOSs), ICU ventilator duration, and mortality. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortalities, ICU and hospital LOSs, and ICU ventilator duration.
 
Definitions
Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia was defined as the growth of K pneumoniae in one or more blood cultures. If more than one positive blood culture result was recorded, only the first sample was included. Empirical antibiotic treatment was defined as the antibiotic used within 24 hours after a culture sample was collected. The empirical antibiotic treatment was considered appropriate if at least one of the antibiotic agents was consistent with the in vitro susceptibility results.8 9 10 Community-acquired infection was defined as K pneumoniae identified in patients upon admission or within 48 hours after admission; hospital-acquired infection was defined as K pneumoniae identified in patients at >48 hours after admission.11 Hepatobiliary sepsis comprised liver abscess, cholangitis, and cholecystitis; gastrointestinal sepsis comprised spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, peritonitis caused by bowel perforation, and intra-abdominal abscesses (excluding liver abscess). Medical co-morbidities (eg, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, chronic renal impairment, haematological malignancy and solid tumour) were defined in accordance with the International Classification of Disease coding. Prior steroid use was defined as oral or intravenous steroid consumption within 30 days before the index positive blood culture result. Chemotherapy use was defined as oral or intravenous infusion of biological agents or chemotherapy administered within 30 days before the index positive blood culture result. Any antibiotics usage within 30 days before the index hospital admission was regarded as prior antibiotics usage.
 
Microbiology
Blood cultures were incubated and processed. Blood culture results were considered negative if no positive growth occurred after 5 to 7 days. Susceptibility interpretation was based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria. The ESBL testing was based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute testing criteria12 13 14 15 16 17 18 or the double-disk synergy test described by Jarlier et al.19 Regarding CR K pneumoniae, the isolates were sent to the Public Health Laboratory Centre of Hong Kong if further genetic testing was required to confirm carbapenemase production. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were performed to detect Classes A, B, and D carbapenemase gene targets.
 
Statistical analysis
We compared the characteristics and clinical parameters between patients treated with appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics, as well as between 90-day survivors and non-survivors. Results are expressed as the median ± interquartile range (IQR) or as the number (percentage) of patients, as appropriate.
 
Categorical variables were compared by the Pearson Chi squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate for univariate analysis. Continuous variables were compared by using the Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with P<0.2 in univariate analysis or with clinical significance from previous studies were included in the multivariate analysis. Independent predictors for 90-day mortality were assessed by Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors for receiving appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics. Post hoc analysis was performed for patients with chronic renal failure and resistant organisms.
 
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Windows version 24.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], US) was used to perform statistical analyses.
 
Results
Baseline characteristics
During the 8.5-year study period, we identified 984 patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia; of these, 686 (69.7%) and 298 (30.3%) received appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics, respectively. Table 1 shows the baseline demographics of patients who received appropriate and inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The median patient age was 75 years (IQR=63-83 years). The most common types of infection were hepatobiliary tract infection (33.1%), urosepsis (24.4%), and respiratory tract infection (18.4%). The overall 90-day mortality was 32.7%, hospital mortality was 22.5%, and median hospital LOS was 10.68 days (5.38-22.81 days, P<0.001).
 

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of adult patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia
 
Appropriateness of empirical antibiotics
Univariate analysis (Table 1) revealed that the risk factors for receiving inappropriate empirical antibiotics were age >65 years (P=0.044), chronic renal impairment (P<0.001), respiratory tract infection (P=0.002), mechanical ventilation (P=0.001), CR or ESBL-producing isolates (both P<0.001), and higher total SOFA score (P=0.048). Hepatobiliary sepsis was associated with a higher rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (P=0.009).
 
Table 2 demonstrates the logistic regression analysis of the predictors for the appropriateness of empirical antibiotics for all patients and ICU subgroup. These include older patients (P=0.010), chronic kidney disease (P=0.007), mechanical ventilation (P=0.005), respiratory tract infection (P=0.034), and either carbapenem resistance or ESBL production (P<0.001). Table 1 shows that the 90-day and hospital mortalities were significantly higher in patients with inappropriate empirical treatment (both P<0.001). Moreover, the hospital LOS was shorter in patients who received inappropriate empirical antibiotics (P<0.001).
 

Table 2. Independent predictors for receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics, according to logistic regression analysis
 
Receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics was associated with higher hospital mortality; this finding was consistent in ICU subgroup (56% vs 23%). The absolute risk increases in mortality associated with the receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics were 18.3% and 33% in ICU subgroup. The number of inappropriate empirical antibiotics associated with each mortality was five in the ICU subgroup and three in all patients.
 
Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections
Antibiograms showing the proportions of non-susceptible K pneumoniae isolates are described in the Online Supplementary Table 1. Twenty (2.0%) patients had CR K pneumoniae bacteraemia, but molecular tests in the Public Health Laboratory Centre of Hong Kong revealed that none of them had CP strains. Overall, 113 (11.5%) patients had ESBL-producing infections.
 
Post hoc analysis revealed that patients with chronic renal failure were more likely to have ESBL infections (18.3% vs 10.5%; P=0.011) and CR infections (0.056% vs 0.015%; P=0.003).
 
Ninety-day mortality
The 90-day all-cause mortalities were 32.7% in all patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia and 34.6% in the ICU subgroup. Univariate analysis (Table 3) showed that 90-day non-survivors were more likely to be aged >65 years (P<0.001), admitted through the Department of Medicine (P<0.001), have septic shock (P=0.005), have a higher total SOFA score (P<0.001), receive inappropriate or no empirical antibiotics (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively), have solid tumour (P<0.001), have respiratory tract infection (P<0.001), be mechanically ventilated (P<0.001), have gastrointestinal infections (P<0.001), and require renal replacement therapy (P=0.044). Patients with diabetes (P=0.001), hepatobiliary sepsis (P<0.001), and urosepsis (P<0.001) had lower 90-day mortalities.
 

Table 3. Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with 90-day mortality
 
Table 4 shows the Cox regression analysis of predictors for 90-day mortality. Independent predictors for increased 90-day mortality were respiratory tract infection (P<0.001), gastrointestinal infection (P<0.001), inappropriate empirical antibiotics (P<0.001), older age (P<0.001), solid tumour (P<0.001), patients admitted through the Department of Medicine (P=0.012), and higher total SOFA score (P<0.001). Patients with diabetes had lower 90-day mortality (P=0.001). The Figure shows the Kaplan–Meier survival plot and according to log rank analysis, the results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in survival among patients who received appropriate empirical antibiotics (P<0.001).
 

Table 4. Independent predictors for increased 90-day mortality according to Cox regression analysis
 

Figure. Kaplan–Meier survival plot showing probability of survival according to receipt of appropriate (dashed line) or inappropriate (solid line) empirical antibiotics
 
Intensive care unit subgroup analysis
Online Supplementary Table 2 shows the demographics for inappropriate empirical antibiotics by logistic regression analysis in ICU subgroup. Overall, 205 (20.8%) patients required intensive care; among them, 148 (72.2%) received appropriate empirical antibiotics, while 57 (27.8%) received inappropriate or no empirical antibiotics. The median patient age was 68 years (IQR=58-78 years). The commonest infection was hepatobiliary infections (42.9%), followed by respiratory tract (23.4%) and urosepsis (14.6%). Furthermore, 82.4% of the patients had septic shock, 33.2% received renal replacement therapy, 60% received mechanical ventilation, and 78.5% had vasopressor use. The ICU and overall 90-day mortalities were 18.5% and 34.6%, respectively. The receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics was significantly associated with higher 90-day mortality (59.6% vs 25.0%; P<0.001), higher ICU mortality (35.1% vs 12.2%; P<0.001), higher hospital mortality (56.1% vs 23.0%; P<0.001), and longer ventilator duration (2 d vs 1 d, P=0.026).
 
Cox regression analysis showed that the receipt of inappropriate or no empirical antibiotics (P<0.001; Table 4) was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia. Other independent predictors were congestive heart failure (P=0.02), admitted through the Department of Medicine (P=0.016), and a higher total SOFA score (P<0.001). Ninety-day non-survivors had longer hospital LOS (P<0.001).
 
Discussion
Appropriateness of empirical antibiotics
Among all patients in this study, 686 (69.7%) received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Furthermore, 148 (72.2%) critically ill patients received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Importantly, 93 (9.5%) patients did not receive any empirical antibiotics. The median hospital LOS for these 93 patients was significantly shorter than the LOS for all patients in the study. We performed event-free survival analysis and found that the LOSs were similar in both groups; these findings suggested that patients who received inappropriate antibiotics had more severe disease and earlier death, leading to a shorter hospital LOS.
 
Micek et al20 found that prior antibiotic exposure was a risk factor for inappropriate empirical therapy. Lautenbach et al21 described a positive correlation between the total cumulative dose of antibiotics and ESBL K pneumoniae infection. In our cohort, prior antibiotics exposure was not significantly correlated with inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment; furthermore, prior antibiotics exposure was not associated with ESBL infections. We examined the presence of prior antibiotics use 30 days prior to positive blood culture results, but information regarding the total cumulative antibiotics exposure in terms of dosing and duration were not available. Other information was unavailable regarding antibiotics prescribed outside hospital settings.
 
Patients with chronic renal failure are reportedly more prone to developing resistant infections.22 They were at greater risk of receiving inappropriate antibiotics. Additionally, hospital-acquired infection has been associated with a higher rate of inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment and higher 90-day mortality.11
 
Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection
The rates of CR and CP K pneumoniae bacteraemia were much lower than the rates reported in other endemic countries.5 A study from Shanghai reported that approximately 22% of all patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia had CR infections; moreover, approximately 59% of the isolates were CR infections in patients who required intensive care.23
 
The prevalence of ESBL K pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong is low.4 The ESBL infection rate in our cohort was 11.5%, similar to previous local studies.1 24 Another study in China demonstrated a much higher rate of ESBL infections (approximately 39%).25 Both ESBL and CR infections were not associated with increased mortality in our study in either the overall patient population or the ICU subgroup. However, ESBL and CR infections were significantly associated with longer hospital LOS.
 
The antibiotics sensitivity in our cohorts was comparable with the antibiogram data in the IMPACT guideline.1 Ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate is recommended as the drug of choice for treatment of K pneumomiae infections in local guidelines.1 In our cohort, more than 80% of K pneumomiae isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate, indicating that it is a reasonable option for broad empirical coverage. Add-on therapy with aminoglycoside improves the coverage of this regimen, because more than 90% of the isolates in our cohort were sensitive to either gentamicin or amikacin. While combination therapy improves the chance of successful empirical therapy, routine use of combination therapy remains controversial.6
 
Ninety-day mortality
The 90-day all-cause mortalities in our study were comparable with the findings in previous studies.24 26 Respiratory tract infections and gastrointestinal infections have consistently been associated with a worse outcome and greater mortality.27 28 In contrast, urosepsis and hepatobiliary sepsis have repeatedly associated with better survival outcomes.29 These sources of infections may be amendable to percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical drainage, allowing more rapid and definitive control of sepsis, which leads to better survival.28
 
A greater proportion of patients with respiratory tract infection did not receive any empirical antibiotics, which might explain the worse outcomes in these patients. The symptoms and signs of respiratory tract infection may overlap with other diseases (eg, heart failure) and treatment may be delayed while waiting for laboratory results and imaging. Given the greater proportion of patients with respiratory tract infections who did not receive any empirical antibiotics, there is a need for early consideration of empirical antibiotics in patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infections.
 
Consistent with the findings of previous studies, we found that older age, solid tumour, and admission through the Department of Medicine were factors associated with higher 90-day mortality.30 31 Patients with these factors were more likely to have other pre-existing co-morbidities, worse premorbid functional status, and be institutionalised. They may also have received a more conservative approach to treatment overall.
 
Diabetes mellitus is well-known to predispose patients to infections, such that affected patients are reportedly 4.4-fold more likely to develop bloodstream infection.32 Similar to the findings by Peralta et al,32 we did not find increased mortality among patients with diabetes. In our cohort, diabetic patients were more likely to had urosepsis than respiratory tract infections. Greater frequency of urosepsis and smaller frequency of respiratory tract infection may have an overall positive effect on survival. Moreover, advances in diabetes care in recent decades (eg, newer generations of medication and integrated multidisciplinary care) have led to neutral effects of diabetes on short-term mortality in patients undergoing major operations and patients with sepsis.34 34 35 Glycaemic status, haemoglobin A1c levels, and diabetes severity were not available in the present study; thus, we could not delineate how diabetes control affected bacteraemia outcomes. Our results are limited to demonstrating that 90-day mortality and diabetes have a greater impact on long-term survival, although this conclusion may not be apparent in the current study.33
 
In addition to mortality, we demonstrated that the inappropriate use of empirical antibiotics was associated with longer ICU ventilator duration, which leads to greater costs and more extensive use of ICU resources. A large retrospective cohort from the US regarding Enterobacteriaceae infections showed that each additional day without appropriate antibiotics was associated with an increased hospital expenditure of US$750 and an increased risk of 30-day readmission.36
 
To the best of our knowledge, the appropriateness of empirical antibiotics has consistently been identified as one of the strongest independent predictors of 90-day mortality in all affected patients and in critically ill patients.37 38 39 Kumar et al8 demonstrated a fivefold increase in mortality among patients with sepsis who received inappropriate initial antibiotics. In this study, we demonstrated a twofold increase in mortality in all patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia, as well as a threefold increase in mortality in critically ill patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia. Furthermore, receipt of inappropriate initial antibiotics was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day mortality in the ICU subgroup. Zilberberg et al40 found that the detrimental effect of inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment could not be corrected despite subsequent targeted antibiotic treatments. A meta-analysis revealed a slower rate of bacterial clearance and increased treatment failure rate when patients were administered inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy.41 Appropriate early antibiotics allow rapid reduction of bacterial load and modulate host defences, thus alleviating some organ dysfunction.42 A more pragmatic approach would be the early administration of broader-spectrum empirical antibiotics and timely de-escalation, according to bacterial sensitivity and the patient’s clinical progression.
 
The chain of sepsis management begins during the first encounter in the Emergency Department and in general hospital wards, rather than in the ICU. Early administration of antibiotics within 3 hours of hospital admission and aggressive sepsis care (beginning in the Emergency Department) can improve survival.42 Another prospective observational study demonstrated that the adequate use of empirical antibiotics prior to ICU admission was the strongest independent factor associated with survival.29 Extensive efforts are needed to facilitate early, appropriate use of empirical antibiotics, including the use of a current antibiogram, implementation of multidisciplinary sepsis management guidelines, and establishment of protocols among pharmacists, microbiologists, clinicians, and nurses.
 
Strengths
To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of K pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong and in the Asia-Pacific region. By including both ICU and general ward patients, we achieved clarity regarding the diverse characteristics of K pneumoniae bacteraemia. We also identified many potential predictors of K pneumoniae bacteraemia–related mortality, based on our extensive literature review and previous publications, then tested these predictors using real-world patient data. By evaluating 90-day mortality, hospital LOS, and ventilator duration, our study more comprehensively evaluated immediate and longer-term complications of bacteraemia; it also provided information for future studies of cost-effectiveness in terms of empirical antibiotics and resource utilisation. Finally, we used the maximum total SOFA score for severity assessment. This score has been repeatedly validated in determining disease severity and predicting mortality in critically ill patients.43 44 45
 
Limitations
This retrospective study was subject to potential confounding factors, including selection bias that could not be completely eliminated from the analysis. Notably, the results of this single-centre study may not be generalisable to other countries with higher CR or CP K pneumoniae infections. Furthermore, this study encompassed a long duration, in which the definitions of sepsis or septic shock might have changed.45 The care of patients with sepsis evolved over time, including advances in source control by percutaneous and endoscopic means that potentially improved patient survival. Nonetheless, the role of empirical antibiotics in patients with sepsis remains an essential sepsis consideration.
 
Antibiotic pharmacodynamics also has a fundamental role in bacteraemia treatment. In this study, we could not collect information regarding the timing of first-dose antibiotics, time to appropriate antibiotics, duration of antibiotics, or time to surgical treatments. Moreover, antibiotic stewardship and therapeutic de-escalation efforts, as well as their impacts on patient outcomes, were not assessed in the present study. Future studies may be needed concerning the prolonged infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics, use of combination therapies, duration of antibiotics, and serum monitoring of antibiotics.
 
Conclusion
The receipt of inappropriate empirical antibiotics led to twofold greater 90-day mortality in patients with K pneumoniae bacteraemia. In critically ill patients, inappropriate use of empirical antibiotics was the strongest independent predictor of mortality. Early identification of high-risk patients and administration of appropriate empirical antibiotics can improve patient outcomes.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: MY Man, HP Shum.
Acquisition of data: MY Man, HP Shum.
Analysis or interpretation of data: MY Man, HP Shum.
Drafting of the manuscript: MY Man.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: WW Yan.
 
All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Declaration
This research was presented by KC Li as an abstract at the 31st Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), 21-24 October 2018, Paris, France.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Hong Kong Easter Cluster Ethics Committee of the Hospital Authority (HKECREC-2018-018). The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.
 
References
1. Ho PL, Wu TC, Chao DV, et al, editors. Reducing bacterial resistance with IMPACT. Interhospital multi-disciplinary programme on antimicrobial chemotherapy. 5th edition. 2017. Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/reducing_bacterial_resistance_with_impact.pdf. Accessed 7 Jun 2020.
2. Ben-David D, Kordevani R, Keller N, et al. Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:54-60. Crossref
3. Wong MH, Shum HP, Chen JH, et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:24. Crossref
4. Man MY, Shum HP, Chan YH, et al. Clinical predictors and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect 2017;97:35-41.Crossref
5. Alicino C, Giacobbe DR, Orsi A, et al. Trends in the annual incidence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: a 8-year retrospective study in a large teaching hospital in northern Italy. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:415. Crossref
6. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304-77.Crossref
7. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 2001;286:1754-8. Crossref
8. Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest 2009;136:1237-48. Crossref
9. Vazquez-Guillamet C, Scolari M, Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Kollef M. Using the number needed to treat to assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as a determinant of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2014;42:2342-9. Crossref
10. Micek ST, Welch EC, Khan J, et al. Empiric combination antibiotic therapy is associated with improved outcome against sepsis due to Gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:1742-8. Crossref
11. Juan CH, Chuang C, Chen CH, Li L, Lin YT. Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and capsular types of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019;8:1. Crossref
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S16 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Sixteenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2006.
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S17 Performance Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Seventeenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2007.
14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S19 Performance Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Nineteenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2009.
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S20 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twentieth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2010.
16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S23 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Third Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2013.
17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S25 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2015.
18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S26 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Sixth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; January 2016.
19. Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis 1988;10:867-78. Crossref
20. Micek ST, Hampton N, Kollef M. Risk factors and outcomes for ineffective empiric treatment of sepsis caused by Gram-negative pathogens: stratification by onset of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;62:e01577-17.
21. Lautenbach E, Patel JB, Bilker WB, Edelstein PH, Fishman NO. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1162-71. Crossref
22. Eilertson B, Cober E, Richter SS, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in patients on renal replacement therapy. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:ofx216.
23. Tian L, Tan R, Chen Y, et al. Epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in a teaching hospital: factors related to the carbapenem resistance and patient mortality. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:48. Crossref
24. Pau CK, Ma FF, Ip M, You JH. Characteristics and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015;47:283-8. Crossref
25. Li L, Huang H. Risk factors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumonia: a singlecenter retrospective study in China. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7924.
26. Melot B, Colot J, Guerrier G. Bacteremic community-acquired infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae: clinical and microbiological presentation in New Caledonia, 2008-2013. Int J Infect Dis 2015;41:29-31. Crossref
27. Russo A, Falcone M, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018;52:577-85.Crossref
28. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Vazquez-Guillamet C, Kollef MH. Multi-drug resistance, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and mortality in Gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care 2014;18:596. Crossref
29. Garnacho-Montero J, Gutiérrez-Pizarraya A, Escoresca-Ortega A, Fernández-Delgado E, López-Sánchez JM. Adequate antibiotic therapy prior to ICU admission in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock reduces hospital mortality. Crit Care 2015;19:302. Crossref
30. Antonio M, Gudiol C, Royo-Cebrecos C, Grillo S, Ardanuy C, Carratalà J. Current etiology, clinical features and outcomes of bacteremia in older patients with solid tumors. J Geriatr Oncol 2019;10:246-51. Crossref
31. Tseng CP, Wu HS, Wu TH, Lin YT, Fung CP. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with community-onset Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia requiring intensive care. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2013;46:217-23. Crossref
32. Peralta G, Sánchez MB, Roiz MP, Garrido JC, Teira R, Mateos F. Diabetes does not affect outcome in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:94. Crossref
33. Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, Mechanick JI, Sharma SK, Adams DH. Diabetes is not a risk factor for hospital mortality following contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:753-8. Crossref
34. Teo BJ, Chong HC, Yeo W, Tan AH. The impact of diabetes on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in an Asian population. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3186-9. Crossref
35. Stegenga ME, Vincent JL, Vail GM, et al. Diabetes does not alter mortality or hemostatic and inflammatory responses in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2010;38:539-45. Crossref
36. Zilberberg MD, Nathanson BH, Sulham K, Fan W, Shorr AF. 30-day readmission, antibiotics costs and costs of delay to adequate treatment of Enterobacteriaceae UTI, pneumonia, and sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2017;6:124. Crossref
37. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Salamanca E, de Cueto M, et al. Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:726-34. Crossref
38. Cheng WL, Hsueh PR, Lee CC, et al. Bacteremic pneumonia caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: appropriateness of empirical treatment matters. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2016;49:208-15. Crossref
39. Kohler PP, Volling C, Green K, Uleryk EM, Shah PS, McGeer A. Carbapenem resistance, initial antibiotic therapy, and mortality in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1319-28. Crossref
40. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Mody SH, Kollef MH. Antimicrobial therapy escalation and hospital mortality among patients with health-care-associated pneumonia: a single-center experience. Chest 2008;134:963-8. Crossref
41. Raman G, Avendano E, Berger S, Menon V. Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-negative infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:395. Crossref
42. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2235-44. Crossref
43. Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:686-96. Crossref
44. Minne L, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care 2008;12:R161.
45. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. Crossref

Questionnaire survey on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour towards viral hepatitis among the Hong Kong public

Hong Kong Med J 2022 Feb;28(1):45–53  |  Epub 23 Jul 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Questionnaire survey on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour towards viral hepatitis among the Hong Kong public
Henry LY Chan, MD1,2; Grace LH Wong, MD1,3,4,5; Vincent WS Wong, MD1,3,4,5; Martin CS Wong, 1,6; Carol YK Chan, PhD7; Shikha Singh, PhD8
1 Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Union Hospital, Hong Kong
3 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4 Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
5 Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
6 JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
7 Gilead Sciences, Hong Kong
8 Kantar Health, Singapore
 
Corresponding author: Dr Henry LY Chan (hlychan@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to identify gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours towards viral hepatitis among the Hong Kong public and provide insights to optimise local efforts towards achieving the World Health Organization’s viral hepatitis elimination target.
 
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, self-reported web-based questionnaire was administered to 500 individuals (aged ≥18 years) in Hong Kong. Questionnaire items explored the awareness and perceptions of viral hepatitis-related liver disease(s) and associated risk factors in English or traditional Chinese.
 
Results: The majority (>80%) were aware that chronic hepatitis B and/or C could increase the risks of developing liver cirrhosis, cancer, and/or failure. Only 55.8% had attended health screenings in the past 2 years, and 67.6% were unaware of their family’s history of liver diseases. Misperceptions surrounding the knowledge and transmission risks of viral hepatitis strongly hint at the presence of social stigmatisation within the community. Many misperceived viral hepatitis as airborne or hereditary, and social behaviours (casual contact or dining with an infected person) as a transmission route. Furthermore, 62.4% were aware of hepatitis B vaccination, whereas 19.0% knew that hepatitis C cannot be prevented by vaccination. About 70% of respondents who were aware of mother-to-child transmission were willing to seek medical consultation in the event of pregnancy. Gaps in knowledge as well as the likelihood of seeking screening were observed across all age-groups and education levels.
 
Conclusions: Comprehensive hepatitis education strategies should be developed to address gaps in knowledge among the Hong Kong public towards viral hepatitis, especially misperceptions relevant to social stigmatisation and the importance of preventive measures, including vaccination and screening, when exposed to risk factors.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • General awareness of potential risks of viral hepatitis developing into liver cirrhosis, cancer, or liver failure.
  • Many still had misperceptions in terms of knowledge and transmission risk of viral hepatitis, suggestive of social stigma or discrimination towards infected individuals.
  • Gaps in knowledge about viral hepatitis and likeliness to seek medical screening were observed across all age-groups, especially in respondents with secondary or higher education.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • We emphasise the importance of preventive measures including screening, diagnosis, treatment, and care to effectively manage viral hepatitis in Hong Kong.
  • It is essential to develop universal education strategies to address misperceptions relevant to social stigmatisation, aligning with the community’s preferences for various information media channels to optimise information reception.
 
 
Introduction
Viral hepatitis is a major public health burden worldwide and is the predominant aetiology of liver cirrhosis and/or liver cancer.1 2 At least 325 million individuals were reported to be infected with viral hepatitis B (HBV) and/or C (HCV).2 3 Hong Kong is considered an endemic area with intermediate incidence of HBV infection.4 In a local epidemiological study conducted between 2015 and 2016, the seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was estimated at 7.8% among the general population.5 In contrast, the prevalence rate of HCV infection in Hong Kong has remained low.6 The seroprevalence of anti-HCV positivity among new blood donors was 0.06% in 2017, compared with 0.11% in 2008.6 The local HCV prevalence among the general population between 2015 and 2016 was estimated at 0.5%,5 which has remained relatively unchanged since 1992.7
 
In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented a global elimination strategy targeted to achieve at least a 90% diagnosis rate of all viral hepatitis cases, an 80% treatment rate for all diagnosed cases, and a 90% reduction in the incidence of viral hepatitis cases.3 Recent epidemiological studies in Hong Kong revealed that the diagnosis and treatment uptake rates within the community were significantly lacking, hovering around 50% compared with the WHO’s 90%/80% targets.5 8 It has been suggested that inadequate knowledge and awareness about viral hepatitis B and C within Hong Kong’s community might be driving this deficiency.5 8 9 10 In other parts of the world, social stigma arising from poor knowledge has been reported to reduce diagnosis and treatment rates among high-risk individuals.11 12 13
 
In 2020, the Hong Kong Viral Hepatitis Action Plan (HKVHAP) 2020-2024 was launched to facilitate achieving the WHO’s eradication target goals by 2030. The action plan outlined four major strategies: (1) Awareness, (2) Surveillance, (3) Prevention, and (4) Treatment to monitor and implement local efforts towards achieving the WHO’s 2030 elimination target.14
 
In the present study, we aimed to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour within Hong Kong’s general population pertaining to viral hepatitis and related risk factors. Furthermore, in this study, we sought to identify potential gaps in existing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour related to the WHO’s global viral hepatitis elimination strategy to optimise local efforts towards the WHO’s target goal.
 
Methods
Study population
Potential respondents were recruited through an existing, general purpose (ie, not healthcare-specific) web-based consumer panel via email in February 2020. Respondents who were aged ≥18 years, had access to online or comfort with web-based administration, and were able to read English or traditional Chinese were eligible to participate in the study. There were no exclusion criteria for this study. All eligible respondents explicitly agreed to join the panel and provided informed online consent to participate in the study.
 
Assuming 95% confidence intervals and 50% response distribution, responses collected from 500 adult individuals were deemed sufficient to provide descriptive estimates with 4.33% margin of error.
 
Study design
Items pertaining to awareness and perceptions of liver diseases among the general public were explored using a self-administered web-based survey. The survey questionnaire was developed in English and translated into traditional Chinese. The translation was validated by a linguist from a translation company who is a native speaker of the language. The developed questionnaire was reviewed and finalised by a steering committee comprising gastroenterology and/or hepatology experts from 11 countries/territories as part of a regional liver index study (Lee Mei-hsuan et al, unpublished). All respondents completed the questionnaire in either English or Chinese. Only de-identified data were collected.
 
Survey questionnaire
The internal consistency of the questionnaire from the regional liver index study was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (threshold: alpha >0.7). As part of this study’s objective to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of Hong Kong’s public towards viral hepatitis-related liver diseases, seven items were extracted from the questionnaire used in a regional liver index study. These items pertained to the awareness and knowledge of liver diseases as well as the respondents’ attitudes and behaviours towards screening and diagnosis of liver diseases (online supplementary Appendix 1; Q1-7).
 
Seven screener questions (online supplementary Appendix 1; S1-7) pertaining to the respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics, including age, sex, education, monthly household income, and their awareness of different types of hepatitis were also included in this study.
 
Respondents who indicated their awareness of ‘hepatitis B’ or ‘hepatitis C’ in screener item S7 proceeded to answer Q1(I)-Q2(I) or Q1(II)-Q2(II). Female respondents who correctly recognised the statement ‘from a pregnant mother to her baby’ in Q2f(I) or Q2f(II) proceeded to answer Q3c.
 
Descriptive analysis
This study was exploratory and descriptive in nature. Respondents’ characteristics and responses to the survey questions were summarised and are presented as frequencies and percentages. No statistical analyses were performed.
 
Missing data were random; all data were reported, including those of respondents who declined to answer certain screener questions, such as on monthly household income. Missing data for any question were excluded from analysis of that question only, not from the whole study.
 
Results
Study population characteristics
Among the respondents, 68.0% were aged ≥35 years, and 56.0% were female. Among the respondents, 59.0% had completed university or higher education, and 76.0% possessed private insurance. About 70% of respondents had a monthly household income of ≥HK$30 000. The respondents’ sex, age, education level, and household income were reflective of Hong Kong’s population.15 Approximately half of the respondents (55.8%) self-reported having attended health screenings within the last 2 years, and about 32.4% of them were aware of their family history pertaining to liver diseases (Table 1).
 
General knowledge and awareness of hepatitis B and C
A higher proportion of respondents were aware of hepatitis B (93.0%, 465/500) than hepatitis C (46.4%, 232/500) [online supplementary Appendix 2]. The majority (>80%) were aware that hepatitis B and C can cause liver failure and increase the risks of developing liver cirrhosis and liver cancer (Fig 1a).
 

Figure 1. Proportion of respondents who correctly identified the features and transmission risks of hepatitis B and C
 
About 60% of respondents who were aware of hepatitis B knew that HBV is not airborne (61.5%) and can be prevented by a vaccine (62.4%). Only approximately 40% (186/465) of the respondents were aware that hepatitis B is not hereditary (Fig 1a). In contrast, only 19.0% (n=44/232) of those aware of hepatitis C knew that it cannot be prevented by vaccination, and about half knew that it is neither airborne (54.3%) nor hereditary (41.8%) [Fig 1a].
 
About half of the respondents aged <25 years (58.2%) and 55 to 64 years (46.9%) were not aware that hepatitis B is preventable by vaccination. More than half of the respondents across all age-groups were unaware that hepatitis B is not hereditary, with the highest proportion aged <25 years (80.0%). A substantial proportion of respondents (>35%) with either secondary or university education misperceived hepatitis B to be airborne (38.5%; 39.8%) or hereditary (62.0%; 59.7%) [online supplementary Appendix 3].
 
More than 70% of respondents across all age-groups and >80% with secondary school or university education misperceived that a vaccine could prevent hepatitis C. About half of subjects aged 25 to 44 years and ≥65 years were not aware that hepatitis C is not airborne, whereas >70% of those aged 25 to 34 years and ≥65 years misperceived hepatitis C to be hereditary. More than half of respondents with university (61.0%) or postgraduate (51.9%) education misperceived hepatitis C as hereditary (online supplementary Appendix 4).
 
Knowledge about the transmission risks of hepatitis B and C
At least 30% of respondents rightly perceived that (1) touching an infected person (HBV: 29.9%; HCV: 31.5%), (2) the faecal-oral route (21.9%; 28.4%); or (3) dining with an infected person (42.2%; 38.4%) were not possible modes of transmission of viral hepatitis B and C (Fig 1b). More than half of the respondents were aware of the mother-to-child transmission risk of HBV (68.4%) and HCV (53.9%) [Fig 1b]. Awareness of other transmission modes of HBV and HCV are detailed in online supplementary Appendix 2.
 
More than 60% of respondents across all age-groups and those with at least secondary school education did not correctly identify the transmission risks of HBV (online supplementary Appendix 5): more than half with secondary or university education misperceived touching (73.3%; 70.4%) or dining with an infected person (60.4%; 56.2%) as HBV transmission risks.
 
With regard to hepatitis C, more than half of the respondents aged ≥35 years and at least 60% of individuals with at least secondary-level education were unaware or incorrectly identified with the statements regarding social interaction and food contamination as HCV transmission risks. Notably, no respondents with the primary school education level were aware of hepatitis C (online supplementary Appendix 6).
 
Likelihood of attending health screening in the event of family planning
Among the 280 female respondents, 65% correctly identified mother-to-child transmission as a transmission risk of viral hepatitis B and/or C (Fig 2). Among these respondents, 70.3% expressed that they were extremely likely or likely to seek a doctor’s consultation to get tested if they were or intended to become pregnant (Fig 2).
 

Figure 2. Respondents’ self-reported likelihood of seeking doctor’s consultation in the event of pregnancy (n=182)
 
About one-fifth of the respondents with university (25.3%) or postgraduate (21.4%) education indicated that they were unlikely (neutral, unlikely, or extremely unlikely) to get tested for viral hepatitis in the event of pregnancy planning. About 40% of the respondents aged <25 years (46.7%) expressed that they were unlikely to seek screening if they wanted to become or became pregnant (Table 2).
 

Table 2. Characteristics of respondents who indicated their likelihood of seeking viral hepatitis testing/screening
 
Preferred disease information topics and channels
The top three disease information topics that the respondents stated that they would like to understand more were disease prevention (84.2%), disease symptoms and complications (60.2%), and treatment (59.4%) [Fig 3a].
 

Figure 3. Topics and channels indicated by respondents for receiving disease information (n=500)
 
Among the various information dissemination channels, about half of the respondents preferred TV (conventional media [52.4%]), internet search (digital/social media [47.8%]) and doctor’s consultation (face-to-face/interpersonal interactions [50.8%]) [Fig 3b].
 
Discussion
There was an improved general awareness (>80%) about the sequelae of HBV and HCV compared with that observed in 2010 (>70%).16 However, a substantial proportion (>60%) of respondents across all age-groups and education levels in Hong Kong held misconceptions about HBV and HCV and their transmission risks.
 
The local awareness of HBV vaccination among Hong Kong respondents (62.4%) was higher than that of Nigeria (31.9%)17 but lower than that of Singapore (75.1%).18 Among those unaware of hepatitis B vaccination in Hong Kong, the majority were aged ≥25 years. This is concerning because these respondents were born before the rollout of the local vaccination programme in 1988. Extensive global and local studies have reported that the implementation of HBV vaccination effectively reduced the incidence and seroprevalence of HBV-associated viral hepatitis.3 6 14 19 20 A recent study in Nigeria showed a relationship between HBV vaccination and knowledge about viral hepatitis,17 suggesting an unmet need to improve knowledge about HBV to increase HBV vaccination uptake, particularly in older adults.
 
Moreover, in this study, we observed a general local misperception that a vaccine is available for HCV, which has been similarly observed globally,18 21 although we observed a slightly higher local awareness rate (19.0%) than that in Singapore (15.0%).18 This lack of awareness pertaining to HCV might impede the adoption of correct preventive measures against hepatitis C infection.22
 
Both the WHO’s hepatitis elimination strategy and HKVHAP 2020-2024 emphasised the importance of combating any forms of stigmatisation or discrimination in the implementation of awareness and communication strategies to improve health outcomes among high-risk individuals.3 14 Social stigmatisation and discrimination stem from the lack of knowledge within society12 23 and among healthcare practitioners.10 Misperceptions such as the idea that hepatitis can be spread by sharing of food or eating utensils, the faecal-oral route, or touching an infected person (perceived by >60% of the study’s respondents) often underlie the social stigmatisation surrounding viral hepatitis.16 18 23 24 These often result in the avoidance of casual contact, self-isolation,11 23 or denial of potential employment or professional advancement,25 26 as experienced by infected individuals across the world. Many respondents without HBV infection in China expressed discomfort about being in close contact or sharing meals with HBV-infected individuals and felt that they should not be allowed to work in restaurants or with children.25 Similarly, 55.2% respondents in a 2019 Korean survey thought HCV patients should use separate towels and dishes,27 which is an indication of the misperception of HCV transmission by causal contact.
 
Over time, these social behaviours arising from misperceptions could result in a paradox for those infected with viral hepatitis, as stigma and shame could lead them to conceal their condition and avoid seeking the necessary medical treatment.26 28 Therefore, there is a need to adopt a comprehensive approach to raise community awareness and knowledge to tackle stigmatisation against infected individuals.
 
The belief that viral hepatitis is hereditary (ie, it could be inherited through ‘bad genes’29) could potentially result in the misunderstanding that there are no preventive measures against viral hepatitis. In fact, mother-to-child transmission is a major route of hepatitis B transmission in Asia. The potential confusion between a vertically transmitted disease and a hereditary one could impede efforts to reduce community transmission of viral hepatitis, as many might not bother to find out more information or proactively seek screening.
 
The HBsAg seropositivity screening during pregnancy and neonatal vaccination are integral parts of HKVHAP and the WHO’s hepatitis elimination strategy to prevent mother-to-child transmission.3 14 Prevention of perinatal transmission of HBV in Hong Kong includes an additional viral load screening of HBsAg-seropositive mothers to guide maternal antiviral therapy. Approximately 70% of pregnant women in Hong Kong (between May 2017 and December 2019) reportedly did not undergo viral load testing or regular hepatological surveillance before pregnancy.30 This is an important public health issue, as viral load in mothers who are hepatitis B carriers is a key influencing factor of immunoprophylaxis success in their babies.31 Among the 280 female respondents, only 128 (45.7%) were aware of the risk of mother-to-child transmission and likely to seek medical consultation in the event of pregnancy, suggesting a gap in women’s awareness and knowledge about viral hepatitis in Hong Kong.
 
Besides vertical transmission, horizontal spread is also an important means of HBV infection. In this study, 67.6% of respondents were unaware of their family’s history of liver disease(s), and only 50% knew that sexual contact is a transmission risk of HBV and HCV (online supplementary Appendix 2). This suggests an unmet need to educate the community about not only mother-to-child transmission, but also other transmission risks. More robust education efforts are needed to raise the population’s level of knowledge and awareness about viral hepatitis to work towards the WHO’s elimination goal. Such outreach efforts could be aligned with the respondents’ preferences for information media channels such as TV, internet search, and doctor’s consultation to optimise community reception.
 
This study has some limitations. Being a self-administered cross-sectional study based on self-reported data, the study is subject to recall bias. As such, data validation could not be performed, and no causal associations could be made. Respondents who lack internet access or comfort with online administration could be underrepresented. Furthermore, this study did not consider factors that could influence respondents’ levels of knowledge and/or awareness or attitudes towards HBV and HCV (eg, respondents’ health consciousness or vaccination or hepatitis status). With <60% having attended a health screening in the past 2 years and <70% expressing a high likelihood of medical consultation when exposed to risk factors, it would be insightful to explore the reasons for these gaps in proactive health-seeking behaviours. This would facilitate addressing and dispelling concerns to promote precautionary measures and health-seeking behaviours to reduce community transmission.
 
As this study is exploratory and descriptive in nature, statistical analyses were not performed to evaluate factors associated with the gaps in knowledge, awareness, and/or practices pertaining to hepatitis B and C; thus, the associations of respondents’ characteristics could not be identified in this study. Additional analyses would be warranted in future studies to confirm any independent factors associated with the community’s levels of knowledge and awareness.
 
Conclusions
In this study, we found that respondents had a general awareness of hepatitis B and C. However, our findings revealed gaps in respondents’ knowledge and understanding of the transmission risks of hepatitis B and C as well as awareness of their family history related to liver disease(s). The findings suggest that there may be social stigmatisation or discrimination against people with HBV and HCV within the community, which may deter some from undergoing screening and diagnosis.
 
It is essential to develop targeted education strategies with special attention towards addressing misperceptions relevant to social stigmatisation or discrimination and raise the importance of preventive measures such as vaccination and screening when exposed to risk factors. Outreach of such targeted education efforts should be aligned with the community’s preferred information channels to maximise information accessibility.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: All authors.
Acquisition of data: S Singh.
Analysis or interpretation of data: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
HLY Chan is an advisor to AbbVie, Aligos, Arbutus, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Hepion, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Vaccitech, Venatorx, and Vir Biotechnology; and a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Mylan, and Roche.
 
GLH Wong has served as an advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences; as a speaker for Abbott, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Furui, Gilead Sciences, Janssen and Roche; and received a research grant from Gilead Sciences.
 
VWS Wong served as a consultant or advisory board member for 3V-BIO, AbbVie, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, the Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Intercept, Inventiva, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum Diagnostics, Pfizer, ProSciento, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Terns; and a speaker for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, and Gilead Sciences. He has received a grant from Gilead Sciences for fatty liver research. He is also a Co-founder of Illuminatio Medical Technology Limited.
 
As an editor of the Journal, MCS Wong was not involved in the peer review process for this article.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge valuable support from Dr Vince Grillo of Kantar Health overseeing the development of the project. The authors thank Dr Amanda Woo of Kantar Health for providing medical writing and editorial support, which was funded by Gilead Sciences, Hong Kong, in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3). The translation of the questionnaire from English to traditional Chinese was performed by GlobaLexicon Limited, United Kingdom and funded by Gilead Sciences, Hong Kong. The authors acknowledge the members of the steering committee for their contribution in reviewing and finalising the questionnaire: Dr Mei-hsuan Lee, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (Taiwan); Dr Sang-hoon Ahn, Yonsei University College of Medicine (South Korea); Dr Henry LY Chan, Union Hospital (Hong Kong); Dr Asad Choudhry, Chaudhry Hospital (Pakistan); Dr Rino Alvani Gani, University of Indonesia (Indonesia); Dr Rosmawati Mohamed, University of Malaya (Malaysia), Dr Janus P Ong, University of the Philippines (Philippines); Dr Akash Shukla, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Global Hospital (India); Dr Chee-kiat Tan, Singapore General Hospital (Singapore); Dr Tawesak Tanwandee, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (Thailand); and Dr Pham-thi Thu Thuy, Ho Chi Minh Medic Medical Center (Vietnam).
 
Funding/support
This study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Hong Kong. Kantar Health, Singapore, received funding from Gilead Sciences, Hong Kong, for the conduct of the study and development of the manuscript.
 
Ethics approval
All eligible respondents explicitly agreed to join the panel and provided informed online consent to participate in the study.
 
References
1. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol 2019;70:151-71. Crossref
2. World Health Organization. Hepatitis in the Western Pacific. Available from: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/hepatitis. Accessed 3 Aug 2020.
3. World Health Organization. Global Health Sector Strategy on Viral Hepatitis, 2016-2021: towards ending viral hepatitis. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246177/WHO-HIV-2016.06-eng.pdf;jsessionid=F5934335456A761C7349258535E3E5EC?sequence=1. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.
4. Lin AW, Wong KH. Surveillance and response of hepatitis B virus in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 1988-2014. Western Pac Surveill Response J 20163;7:24-8. Crossref
5. Liu KS, Seto WK, Lau EH, et al. A territory-wide prevalence study on blood-borne and enteric viral hepatitis in Hong Kong. J Infect Dis 2019;219:1924-33. Crossref
6. Viral Hepatitis Control Office, Special Preventive Programme, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Surveillance of viral hepatitis in Hong Kong—2017 update report. Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/viral_hepatitis_report.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2021.
7. Chan GC, Lim W, Yeoh EK. Prevalence of hepatitis C infection in Hong Kong. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;7:117-20. Crossref
8. Hui YT, Wong GL, Fung JY, et al. Territory-wide population-based study of chronic hepatitis C infection and implications for hepatitis elimination in Hong Kong. Liver Int 2018;38:1911-9. Crossref
9. Lao TT, Sahota DS, Suen SS, Lau TK, Leung, TY. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and rubella susceptibility in pregnant women. J Viral Hepat 2010;17:737-41. Crossref
10. Paterson BL, Backmund M, Hirsch G, Yim C. The depiction of stigmatization in research about hepatitis C. Int J Drug Policy 2007;18:364-73. Crossref
11. Zacks S, Beavers K, Theodore D, et al. Social stigmatization and hepatitis C virus infection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:220-4. Crossref
12. Mokaya J, McNaughton AL, Burbridge L, et al. A blind spot? Confronting the stigma of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection—a systematic review. Wellcome Open Res 2018;3:29. Crossref
13. Marinho RT, Barreira DP. Hepatitis C, stigma and cure. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:6703-9. Crossref
14. Viral Hepatitis Control Office, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Hong Kong Viral Hepatitis Action Plan 2020-2024. Available from: https://www.hepatitis.gov.hk/english/document_cabinet/action_plan.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2020.
15. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Population and Household Statistics Analysed by District Council District. Available from: https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11303012019AN19B0100.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2021.
16. Leung CM, Wong WH, Chan KH, et al. Public awareness of hepatitis B infection: a population-based telephone survey in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2010;16:463-9.
17. Eni AO, Soluade MG, Oshamika OO, Efekemo OP, Igwe TT, Onile-ere OA. Knowledge and awareness of hepatitis B virus infection in Nigeria. Ann Glob Health 2019;85:56. Crossref
18. Tan CK, Goh GB, Youn J, Yu JC, Singh S. Public awareness and knowledge of liver health and diseases in Singapore. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021 Mar 18. Epub ahead of print. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgh.15496. Accessed 2 May 2021. Crossref
19. Meireles LC, Marinho RT, Van Damme P. Three decades of hepatitis B control with vaccination. World J Hepatol 2015;7:2127-32. Crossref
20. Posuwan N, Wanlapakorn N, Sintusek P, et al. Towards the elimination of viral hepatitis in Thailand by the year 2030. J Virus Erad 2020;6:100003. Crossref
21. Ha S, Timmerman K. Awareness and knowledge of hepatitis C among health care providers and the public: a scoping review. Can Commun Dis Rep 2018;44:157-65. Crossref
22. Wait S, Kell E, Hamid S, et al. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in southeast and southern Asia: challenges for governments. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;1:248-55. Crossref
23. Lee H, Fawcett J, Kim D, Yang JH. Correlates of hepatitis B virus-related stigmatization experienced by Asians: a scoping review of literature. Asia-Pac J Oncol Nurs 2016;3:324-34. Crossref
24. Smith-Palmer J, Cerri K, Sbarigia U, et al. Impact of stigma on people living with chronic hepatitis B. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2020;11:95-107. Crossref
25. Huang J, Guan ML, Balch J, et al. Survey of hepatitis B knowledge and stigma among chronically infected patients and uninfected persons in Beijing, China. Liver Int 2016;36:1595-603. Crossref
26. Northrop JM. A dirty little secret: stigma, shame and hepatitis C in the health setting. Med Humanit 2017;43:218-24. Crossref
27. Choi GH, Jang ES, Kim JW, Jeong SH. A survey of the knowledge of and testing rate for hepatitis C in the general population in South Korea. Gut Liver 2020;14:808-16. Crossref
28. Gautier RL, Wallace J, Richmond JA, Pitts M. The personal and social impact of chronic hepatitis B: a qualitative study of Vietnamese and Chinese participants in Australia. Health Soc Care Community. 2020. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hsc.13197. Accessed 27 Jan 2021. Crossref
29. Haga SB, Barry WT, Mills R, et al. Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013;17:327-35. Crossref
30. Hui PW, Ng C, Cheung KW, Lai CL. Acceptance of antiviral treatment and enhanced service model for pregnant patients carrying hepatitis B. Hong Kong Med J 2020;26:318-22. Crossref
31. Cheung KW, Seto MT, Wong SF. Towards complete eradication of hepatitis B infection from perinatal transmission: review of the mechanisms of in utero infection and the use of antiviral treatment during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;169:17-23. Crossref

Effects of pill splitting training on drug physiochemical properties, compliance, and clinical outcomes in the elderly population: a randomised trial

Hong Kong Med J 2021 Jun;27(3):184–91  |  Epub 11 Jun 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
Effects of pill splitting training on drug physiochemical properties, compliance, and clinical outcomes in the elderly population: a randomised trial
Vivian WY Lee, PharmD, BCPS1; Joyce TS Li, BPharm1; Felix YH Fong, BPharm1; Bryan PY Yan, FHKAM (Medicine)2
1 Centre for Learning Enhancement and Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Prof Vivian WY Lee (vivianlee@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to provide information about the clinical and physiochemical effects of pill splitting training in elderly cardiac patients in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: A parallel study design was adopted. Patients taking lisinopril, amlodipine, simvastatin, metformin, or perindopril who needed to split pills were recruited from the Prince of Wales Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups at their first visit. Patients in group A split drugs using their own technique, whereas patients in group B used pill cutters after relevant training until their next follow-up visit. The primary outcome was the change in drug content between before and after the pill splitting training. Assays were performed to determine the drug content. Secondary outcomes were the changes in clinical outcomes, patients’ attitudes and acceptance towards pill splitting, and patients’ knowledge about pill splitting.
 
Results: A total of 193 patients were recruited, and 101 returned for the follow-up visit. The percentage of split tablets falling within the assay limits increased from 39.13% to 47.82% (P=0.523) in group A and from 48.94% to 51.06% (P=1.000) in group B. The changes did not reach statistical significance. As for clinical outcomes, the mean triglyceride level decreased from 1.62±1.05 to 1.36±0.80 (P=0.049), whereas the mean heart rate increased significantly from 73.97±11.01 to 77.92±12.72 (P=0.026). Changes in other parameters were not significant.
 
Conclusion: This study highlights the high variability of drug content after pill splitting. Pills with dosages that do not require splitting would be preferable, considering patients’ preference. Patients should be educated to use pill cutters properly if pill splitting is unavoidable.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • There is high variability of drug content after pill splitting.
  • Patients prefer to take pills that do not require splitting.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Patients should be supplied with formulations that do not require splitting if possible.
  • Patients should be educated to use pill cutters properly if pill splitting is unavoidable.
 
 
Introduction
Pill splitting by patients is common globally. A German study observed that 24.1% of all drugs required splitting,1 and a Swiss study found that 10% of all discharged prescriptions contained pill splitting.2 In Sweden, 10% of 600 000 investigated prescriptions required splitting, and over 30% of the Swedish patients stated that they had problems dividing the tablets.3 The observed prevalence of pill splitting has been observed to range from 10% to >35% worldwide1 4 5 6 and was even higher in elderly patients (35-67%).6 7 One of the reasons for pill splitting is cost saving because it may result in institutions not needing to stock too many drug items in their formularies.1 In addition, drug splitting may achieve dose flexibility, particularly for patients requiring frequent dosing adjustment.8 Furthermore, some dosages may not be commercially available, especially those for off-label drug use. In these cases, splitting drugs may be essential.9 10 11 Nevertheless, it can also create other clinical issues including medication non-compliance, difficulties experienced by patients in handling unscored pills, drugs that crumble after splitting, and inappropriate drug splitting of extended release formulations, which may lead to treatment failure or toxicity.12 A published study reported that most hypertensive patients preferred not to split pills and that over 70% of patients were willing to pay more for medications with dosages that they did not need to split.13 Limited published studies have addressed this drug-related problem. In this study, we aimed to identify the effects of pill splitting on drug physiochemical properties and clinical outcomes among elderly cardiac patients.
 
Methods
Study design
A parallel design was adopted in this study. Patients were recruited from the Cardiac or Hypertension clinics of the Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong. After medical records review, it was found that lisinopril, amlodipine, simvastatin, metformin, and perindopril were among the most commonly prescribed medications that required splitting in the two clinics. Therefore, patients who needed to split their pills when taking lisinopril, amlodipine, simvastatin, metformin, or perindopril were recruited. Patients were randomised into either group A (pill splitting with self-technique) or group B (pill splitting with instructions and training) after their first clinic visit. All patients were asked to sign an informed consent form before enrolment. Group A patients were asked to split drugs using their own technique and continue until their next clinic visit. Group B patients were given proper instruction by pharmacists or pharmacy students on using pill cutters at their first visit and were asked to cut their pills accordingly until their next clinic visit. Patients watched a 2-minute video that explained the reasons for using pill cutters and described the proper way to open the pill cutter, position the drug in the pill cutter, clean the pill cutter, and store the split pills. Subsequently, the pharmacist answered patients’ enquiries regarding the video or other questions related to pill splitting. The current study did not change any drug or dosage of the patient’s existing treatment regimens. Follow-up clinic visits were scheduled with mean duration between first and follow-up clinic visits of 23.1±7.3 weeks.
 
Participants
Chinese patients aged ≥65 years, both male and female, and currently prescribed one or more of metformin, lisinopril, perindopril, amlodipine, or simvastatin (which require splitting) were included in the current study. Patients with dementia or severe physical limitations such as hemiplegia, blindness, or upper limb contractures were excluded from the study.
 
In our pilot study, we found that the change in drug assays of metformin, atenolol, and amlodipine varied from 52.7% to 147.2% after splitting.14 In our previously published study, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (from 152.38±18.80 mm Hg to 147.04±20.72 mm Hg, P=0.021) after pharmacist intervention.15 The sample size for the primary outcome was calculated based on a population standard deviation of 0.75, and that for the secondary outcomes was based on a population standard deviation of 0.85. To achieve a 5% significance level and 80% power, 30 and 45 patients in each group would be needed for the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. We expected a 10% dropout rate, and therefore, at least 80 patients were recruited for each group. There were 193 total participants in this study.
 
The participants were randomised into group A or B using a computerised dynamic allocation programme and stratification according to types of medications taken, sex, age, and visit dates to ensure balanced patient allocation. All operations were performed by the same pharmacist who conducted the survey.
 
Outcome measures
The primary outcome was the change of drug content before and after the pill splitting training. At baseline, patients in groups A and B were asked to split three tablets of the drugs that they were currently taking using their usual technique. At follow-up visit, group A patients were asked to split three tablets using their own technique, and group B patients were asked to split three tablets using a pill cutter. Two halved tablets were randomly selected for analysis each time. The halved tablets were weighed, and standard drug assays were performed. The drug content of metformin was assessed by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry; that of amlodipine, simvastatin, and perindopril was assessed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography; and that of lisinopril was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography.
 
The secondary outcomes were the changes in clinical outcomes between before and after the pill splitting training, including the change in blood pressure measurements, haemoglobin A1c, and cholesterol levels, the changes in patients’ attitudes towards and acceptance of pill splitting, and the changes in patients’ knowledge about pill splitting. Haemoglobin A1c and lipid levels were usually collected in hospital 1 week before patients’ clinic visit. Upon initiating their clinic visits, patients had their blood pressures measured in the hospital’s nurse station before they met their physicians. Blood pressure, haemoglobin A1c, and cholesterol levels were collected at baseline and at follow-up visit, and the patients’ knowledge about and attitudes towards pill splitting were assessed by questionnaires.
 
Statistical analysis
Paired-samples t tests were used for intra-group comparisons, and independent-samples t tests were used for inter-group comparisons of mean tablet weight between before and after pill splitting training. Paired-samples t tests were also used to assess the changes in clinical outcomes. McNemar’s test was used for intra-group comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) was used for inter-group comparisons of content uniformity, change in patients’ acceptance towards pill splitting, and change in patients’ knowledge about pill splitting. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical programme (Windows version 25.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States).
 
Results
Participants
A total of 193 eligible patients were enrolled on or before 17 January 2019, and they had follow-up visits on or before 30 April 2019. The patients were randomised into group A (n=106) and group B (n=87). A total of 101 patients participated, of whom 47 from group A and 54 from group B returned for follow-up visit. Among them, 46 patients from group A and 47 patients from group B provided samples for assay. The primary outcome analysis was conducted on those patients, and the secondary outcomes analysis was conducted on the 101 patients who returned for follow-up visit. The patients’ demographic data are shown in Table 1.
 

Table 1. Patients’ demographics at first (baseline) and follow-up clinic visits (mean duration 23.1 ± 7.3 weeks)
 
Drug content
The primary outcome was the change of drug content between before and after the pill splitting training. Patients were asked to split three tablets during each visit. Two halved tablets were randomly selected as samples. The samples were weighed, and assays were performed. The mean weight of the halved tablets at baseline and at follow-up visit is documented in Table 2. Table 3 shows the percentage of halved tablets that were within the assay specifications at baseline and at follow-up visit. The percentage of samples with both halved tablets within range was compared between groups A and B. In group A, the percentage in range increased from 39.13% to 47.82% (P=0.523), and the corresponding increase for group B was from 48.94% to 51.06% (P=1.000). The difference in drug assay results between groups A and B at baseline (P=0.406) and at follow-up visit (P=0.837) also did not reach statistical significance.
 

Table 2. Mean weights of drug samples at first (baseline) and follow-up clinic visits (mean duration 23.1 ± 7.3 weeks)
 

Table 3. Percentage of halved tablets within assay specifications at first (baseline) and follow-up clinic visits (mean duration 23.1 ± 7.3 weeks)
 
Clinical outcomes
The correlation between pill cutting training and clinical outcomes is summarised in Table 4. The mean triglyceride in group B decreased significantly from 1.62±1.05 to 1.36±0.80 mmol/L (P=0.049), whereas the mean heart rate increased significantly from 73.97±11.01 to 77.92±12.72 bpm (P=0.026). In group B, there was also improvement in the mean diastolic blood pressure (from 73.40±14.39 to 73.05±9.33 mm Hg), high-density lipoprotein (from 1.40±0.39 to 1.46±0.44 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein (from 1.87±0.88 to 1.85±0.73 mmol/L), and total cholesterol (from 3.98±0.93 to 3.91±0.85 mmol/L), but those differences did not reach statistical significance. In the overall cohort, improvements were seen in diastolic blood pressure (from 74.21±12.47 to 74.01±9.98 mm Hg), high-density lipoprotein (from 1.42±0.37 to 1.43±0.40 mmol/L), total cholesterol (from 3.90±0.97 to 3.88±0.96 mmol/L), and triglyceride (from 1.46±0.91 to 1.31±0.72 mmol/L), but the changes did not reach statistical significance.
 

Table 4. Change in clinical outcomes from first (baseline) to follow-up clinic visits (mean duration 23.1 ± 7.3 weeks)
 
Patients’ backgrounds, attitudes, and knowledge
In total, 57.43% of patients split their pills with their bare hands, followed by pill cutters (24.75%), knives (13.86%), and scissors (10.89%). The major reasons for not using pill cutters included: (1) the current method could split pills evenly (68.18%), (2) using pill cutters was time consuming (34.09%), and (3) the pills could not be split evenly by pill cutters (15.91%). The major reasons for using pill cutters included: (1) pills could be cut evenly (80.95%) and (2) the patient was able to exert force more easily (33.33%). In total, 29.70% and 24.75% of patients found pill splitting troublesome at baseline and at follow-up visit, respectively (the difference was not significant, P=0.063). The three major problems encountered by patients while splitting pills were (1) difficulty splitting the pills evenly (17.00%), (2) the pills easily fragmented (10.00%), and (3) difficulty seeing the pills clearly, as they were too small (9.00%). Overall, 61.00% of the patients claimed that they had no difficulties. Nevertheless, 98.21% preferred to take tablets with exact dosages so that no splitting would be required. Patients’ responses to other questions are listed in Table 5.
 

Table 5. Patients’ backgrounds, attitudes, and compliance rates
 
Table 6 shows that a significantly higher portion of patients in group B had a correct understanding of the following three questions after training: ‘Using pill cutters allows pills to be divided into more accurate doses’ (from 7.41% to 31.48%; P=0.002); ‘The pills should be put into the triangular tip of the pill cutter’ (from 9.26% to 31.48%; P=0.008); and ‘Pill cutters should be stored in a cool and dry place, away from sun or moisture’ (from 9.26% to 35.19%; P=0.003). In contrast, patients in group A did not show a statistically significant improvement in their understanding of any question. During the interview and evaluation of patients’ knowledge about pill splitting at baseline and at follow-up visit, we did not detect any patients with major physical or cognitive abnormalities.
 

Table 6. Change in patients’ knowledge about pill splitting at first (baseline) and follow-up clinic visits (mean duration 23.1 ± 7.3 weeks)
 
Discussion
Tablet splitting is a common practice in in-patient and out-patient settings,16 and it may be desirable in terms of dose adjustment, cost saving, and ease of swallowing.3 11 12 17 18 19 20 Nevertheless, it has been reported that splitting pills may cause drug instability, loss of drug due to powdering, uneven dosage, and reduced drug strength.21 22 It is generally understood that using tablet splitting devices can provide a more consistent dose.10 21 Previous studies have identified some characteristics that might affect the quality of halved tablets. Coated, unscored, and small tablets were found to be more difficult to cut.23 Individual pill cutting skill was another crucial factor that determined tablets’ uniformity.23 In the current study, only 24.75% of patients split pills using pill cutters, and only 14.43% of patients had received pill splitting training. Therefore, it is likely that the drug content in the halved tablets did not reach assay standards.
 
Previous studies mainly focused on the weight deviations among halved tablets, not on drug content.21 22 One study showed that more than one-third of sampled half-tablets did not meet the United States Pharmacopeia specifications.24 The measured drug content variations among half-tablets were: warfarin sodium (90.01%-109.40%), simvastatin (95.21%-111.35%), metoprolol succinate (82.77%-115.92%), metoprolol tartrate (94.83%-112.37%), citalopram (96.50-111.93%), and lisinopril (81.15%-125.72%). In another study, five of eight drugs failed to meet European Pharmacopoeia recommendations for tablet weight deviation after splitting, with 25% of samples deviating by >15% and 10% of samples deviating by >25%.23 The study drugs used were phenobarbitone (maximum deviation: 80.45%), digoxin (maximum deviation: 56.69%), chloroquine (maximum deviation: 48.97%), atenolol (maximum deviation: 45.37%), and doxycycline (maximum deviation: 43.97%). In the present study, both halves of the tablet were within the assay standard at baseline for 39.13% and 48.94% of the patients in groups A and B, respectively. After training, this percentage increased to 47.82% and 51.06%, respectively, but the improvement was not significant, and the percentage of tablets in range was still relatively low. The results corroborated those of previous studies.
 
Few studies have examined the effect of patient education on the drug content of split pills.25 26 In the current study, we found no significant improvement in content uniformity after pill splitting training. This may be because our patients were elderly patients who may not have been able to perform the task well after a single training session. Content uniformity after pill splitting may be improved if pills are split by pharmacists or qualified staff. A study of paediatric pharmacists suggested that tablets >8 mm could be split once to achieve an approximate half dose for paediatric use.27 Another study found a significant difference in splitting accuracy between nurses and laypersons.23 Nevertheless, only 39.29% of that study’s patients were eager to partake of pill splitting service, and only 18.18% were willing to pay extra money for it. Therefore, pill cutting service may not be practical without a financial incentive.
 
Triglyceride levels decreased significantly and heart rate increased significantly in group B patients after the intervention. Nevertheless, we did not evaluate the patients’ diet consumption or exercise levels, which may impact their triglyceride levels. No significant change in clinical outcomes was observed in other groups or other parameters. Because the studied drugs were lisinopril, perindopril, simvastatin, and amlodipine, which are not narrow-therapeutic-index drugs, these results were predictable and coincide with other studies that concluded that drugs with long half-life and wide therapeutic index are less likely to be affected.20 28 In view of the high variability of blood pressure measurements in the clinic, all patients were originally instructed to conduct daily blood pressure measurements at home using a portable blood pressure monitor. However, many patients did not measure their blood pressure daily or did not keep a proper self-record, so the clinical outcomes relied on the readings at clinic visits, which may not be consistent with their usual readings. In addition, management of chronic diseases like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidaemia could be influenced by multiple factors, and 3 months was a relatively short period for observation. The effect of drug content deviation after splitting on clinical outcomes may be more obvious in antibiotics or drugs with narrow therapeutic index (eg, digoxin).23 29 30
 
In the current study, we focused on the effect of pill splitting on drug content. Nevertheless, pill splitting may have other effects on drugs. The pill may carry a bitter taste, as the coating is broken, and the active ingredients may be more susceptible to moisture after exposure.31 Over 70% of patients prepared a sufficient quantity of pills for more than 1 day each time. In total, 36.63% of patients cut for 2 days to 1 week, 26.73% cut for 1 week to 1 month, and 6.93% cut for more than 1 month each time. Exposing the cut pills for too long may increase the risk of crushing or cracking.19 In total, 83.93% of patients found pill splitting training helpful, and the intervention produced significant improvement in patients’ knowledge about pill splitting. This study has identified the major difficulties encountered by patients and the reasons behind their choices. Those problems should be addressed in future patient education. More than half of patients split pills with their bare hands, and the majority of patients who did not use pill cutters thought their own methods could divide pills evenly and that the use of pill cutters was time consuming. The major obstacles patients faced were the difficulties in splitting pills evenly and that the pills fragmented easily. Overall, 98.21% of patients preferred to take tablets with the exact dosage instead of splitting pills. Previous studies also found that dispensing the exact dosage would be more favourable.23 32 Nevertheless, if pill splitting is unavoidable, pharmacists should encourage patients to split coated, unscored, or irregularly shaped tablets with pill cutters to reduce crushing or fragmenting. Pharmacists should also educate patients about the appropriate way to use and clean pill cutters and remind patients to seek doctors’ or pharmacists’ advice before cutting any pills.21 23 33
 
This project has several limitations. First, the participants’ dropout rate was high, which might result in attrition bias. Compared with group A, a higher proportion of group B patients returned for follow-up visits. The statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes among group B patients might be caused by their higher awareness about their own health instead of the effectiveness of the pill splitting method. There were limited human resources to make phone calls to patients between the baseline and face-to-face follow-up visits, which could have served as a reminder for patients to attend follow-up visits and perform home monitoring of their blood pressure and their pill splitting methods.
 
Second, dietary consumption and exercise levels were not evaluated, even though they may affect the clinical outcomes. Third, participants’ education level, household income, and major caregivers were not collected at baseline. Only approximately 65% of participants who attended follow-up visits provided such information. These confounding factors might affect patients’ ability to understand and memorise the steps of using pill cutters, thus affecting the content uniformity of their split pills. The effects of patients’ characteristics on their knowledge and pill splitting skills were not assessed in the current study.
 
Conclusion
This study revealed that content uniformity can hardly be achieved after pill splitting by patients. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed after pill splitting training. It is preferable for pills with doses that do not require splitting to be provided, considering the assay results and patients’ preference. Currently, there is inadequate patient education about pill splitting. Pharmacists should educate patients to use pill cutters properly if splitting is inevitable.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: VWY Lee, FYH Fong, BPY Yan.
Acquisition of data: VWY Lee, FYH Fong, BPY Yan.
Analysis or interpretation of data: JTS Li.
Drafting of the manuscript: JTS Li.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: VWY Lee.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
As an editor of the journal, BPY Yan was not involved in the peer review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgement
We thank the technicians at the School of Pharmacy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong for carrying out the drug physiochemical tests and the staff at Prince of Wales Hospital for arranging the logistics for patient counselling.
 
Funding/support
This study was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government (#14152111). The funder had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was obtained from The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Clinical trial registration no.: CREC Ref No. 2017.014). Patient consent was obtained upon enrolment. The trial protocol can be obtained as requested.
 
References
1. Quinzler R, Gasse C, Schneider A, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Szecsenyi J, Haefeli WE. The frequency of inappropriate tablet splitting in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62:1065-73. Crossref
2. Berg C, Ekedahl A. Dosages involving splitting tablets: common but unnecessary? J Pharm Health Serv Res 2010;1:137-41. Crossref
3. Rodenhuis N, De Smet PA, Barends DM. The rationale of scored tablets as dosage form. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;21:305- 8. Crossref
4. Rodenhuis N, de Smet PA, Barends DM. Patient experiences with the performance of tablet score lines needed for dosing. Pharm World Sci 2003;25:173-6. Crossref
5. Stanković I, Pešić M, Lalić M. Breaking of tablets as a cost-saving strategy. Timočki Medicinski Glasnik 2007;32:5-10.
6. Fischbach MS, Gold JL, Lee M, Dergal JM, Litner GM, Rochon PA. Pill splitting in a long-term care facility. CMAJ 2001;164:785-6.
7. Denneboom W, Dautzenberg MG, Grol R, De Smet PA. User-related pharmaceutical care problems and factors affecting them: the importance of clinical relevance. J Clin Pharm Ther 2005;30:215-23. Crossref
8. Peek BT, Al-Achi A, Coombs SJ. Accuracy of tablet splitting by elderly patients. JAMA 2002;288:451-2. Crossref
9. Duncan MC, Castle SS, Streetman DS. Effect of tablet splitting on serum cholesterol concentrations. Ann Pharmacother 2002;36:205-9. Crossref
10. Rindone JP. Evaluation of tablet-splitting in patients taking lisinopril for hypertension. JCOM Wayne PA 2000;7:22-30.
11. Gee M, Hasson NK, Hahn T, Ryono R. Effects of a tablet-splitting program in patients taking HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: analysis of clinical effects, patient satisfaction, compliance and cost avoidance. J Manag Care Pharm 2002;8:453-8. Crossref
12. Fawell NG, Cookson TL, Scranton SS. Relationship between tablet splitting and compliance, drug acquisition costs, and patient acceptance. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999;56:2542-5. Crossref
13. McDevitt JT, Gurst AH, Chen Y. Accuracy of tablet splitting. Pharmacotherapy 1998;18:193-7.
14. Lee VW, Yu Y, Tang L, Yan B. Impact of pill-splitting training on drug physiochemical properties, compliance and clinical outcomes in elderly population–a cross-over cohort study. Value Health 2013;16:A514. Crossref
15. Lee VW, Pang PT, Kong KW, Chan PK, Kwok FL. Impact of pharmacy outreach services on blood pressure management in the elderly community in Hong Kong. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013;13:175-81. Crossref
16. Crawford DJ. Is tablet splitting safe? Nursing made incredibly easy 2011;9:18-20. Crossref
17. Cohen CI, Cohen SI. Potential savings from splitting newer antidepressant medications. CNS Drugs 2002;16:353-8. Crossref
18. Stafford RS, Radley DC. The potential of pill splitting to achieve cost savings. Am J Manag Care 2002;8:706-12.
19. Bachynsky J, Wiens C, Melnychuk K. The practice of splitting tablets: cost and therapeutic aspects. Pharmacoeconomics 2002;20:339-46. Crossref
20. Helmy SA. Tablet splitting: is it worthwhile? Analysis of drug content and weight uniformity for half tablets of 16 commonly used medications in the outpatient setting. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2015;21:76-86. Crossref
21. Verrue C, Mehuys E, Boussery K, Remon JP, Petrovic M. Tablet-splitting: a common yet not so innocent practice. J Adv Nurs 2010;67:26-32. Crossref
22. Rosenberg JM, Nathan JP, Plakogiannis F. Weight variability of pharmacist-dispensed split tablets. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 2002;42:200-5. Crossref
23. Elliott I, Mayxay M, Yeuichaixong S, Lee SJ, Newton PN. The practice and clinical implications of tablet splitting in international health. Trop Med Int Health 2014;19:754-60. Crossref
24. Hill SW, Varker AS, Karlage K, Myrdal PB. Analysis of drug content and weight uniformity for half-tablets of 6 commonly split medications. J Manag Care Pharm 2009;15:253-61. Crossref
25. Gharaibeh SF, Tahaineh L. Effect of different splitting techniques on the characteristics of divided tablets of five commonly split drug products in Jordan. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2020;18:1776. Crossref
26. Ashrafpour R, Ayati N, Sadeghi R, et al. Comparison of treatment response achieved by tablet splitting versus whole tablet administration of levothyroxine in patients with thyroid cancer. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2018;6:108-12. Crossref
27. Andersson ÅC, Lindemalm S, Eksborg S. Dividing the tablets for children—good or bad? Pharm Methods 2016;7:23-7. Crossref
28. Chou CL, Hsu CC, Chou CY, Chen TJ, Chou LF, Chou YC. Tablet splitting of narrow therapeutic index drugs: a nationwide survey in Taiwan. Int J Clin Pharm 2015;37:1235-41. Crossref
29. Simpson JA, Watkins ER, Price RN, Aarons L, Kyle DE, White NJ. Mefloquine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models: implications for dosing and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:3414-24. Crossref
30. White NJ, Pongtavornpinyo W, Maude RJ, et al. Hyperparasitaemia and low dosing are an important source of anti-malarial drug resistance. Malar J 2009;8:253. Crossref
31. Margiocco ML, Warren J, Borgarelli M, Kukanich B. Analysis of weight uniformity, content uniformity and 30-day stability in halves and quarters of routinely prescribed cardiovascular medications. J Vet Cardiol 2009;11:31-9. Crossref
32. Madathilethu J, Roberts M, Peak M, Blair J, Prescott R, Ford JL. Content uniformity of quartered hydrocortisone tablets in comparison with mini-tablets for paediatric dosing. BMJ Paediatr Open 2018;2:e000198. Crossref
33. Allemann SS, Bornand D, Hug B, Hersberger KE, Arnet I. Issues around the prescription of half tablets in Northern Switzerland: the irrational case of quetiapine. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:602021. Crossref

Expanded carrier screening using next-generation sequencing of 123 Hong Kong Chinese families: a pilot study

Hong Kong Med J 2021 Jun;27(3):177–83  |  Epub 19 Feb 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
Expanded carrier screening using next-generation sequencing of 123 Hong Kong Chinese families: a pilot study
Olivia YM Chan, FHKCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics and Gynaecology)1,2 #; TY Leung, FRCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics and Gynaecology)1,3 #; Y Cao, PhD1,3,4; MM Shi, MPhil1; Angel HW Kwan, MRCOG1; Jacqueline PW Chung, FHKCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics and Gynaecology)1; KW Choy, PhD1,3; SC Chong, FHKCPaed, FHKAM (Paediatrics)3,4
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Adept Medical Centre, Hong Kong
3 The Chinese University of Hong Kong–Baylor College of Medicine Joint Center of Medical Genetics, Hong Kong
4 Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
# These authors equally contributed to this work
 
Corresponding author: Dr SC Chong (chongsc@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: To determine the carrier frequency and common mutations of Mendelian variants in Chinese couples using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
 
Methods: Preconception expanded carrier testing using NGS was offered to women who attended the subfertility clinic. The test was then offered to the partners of women who had positive screening results. Carrier frequency was calculated, and the results of the NGS panel were compared with those of a target panel.
 
Results: In total, 123 women and 20 of their partners were screened. Overall, 84 (58.7%) individuals were identified to be carriers of at least one disease, and 68 (47.6%) were carriers after excluding thalassaemias. The most common diseases found were GJB2-related DFNB1 nonsyndromic hearing loss and deafness (1 in 4), alpha-thalassaemia (1 in 7), beta-thalassaemia (1 in 14), 21-hydroxylase deficient congenital adrenal hyperplasia (1 in 13), Pendred’s syndrome (1 in 36), Krabbe’s disease (1 in 48), and spinal muscular atrophy (1 in 48). Of the 43 identified variants, 29 (67.4%) were not included in the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics or American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines. Excluding three couples with alpha-thalassaemia, six at-risk couples were identified.
 
Conclusion: The carrier frequency of the investigated members of the Chinese population was 58.7% overall and 47.6% after excluding thalassaemias. This frequency is higher than previously reported. Expanded carrier screening using NGS should be provided to Chinese people to improve the detection rate of carrier status and allow optimal pregnancy planning.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • The carrier frequency of Mendelian variants in the Chinese population is higher than previously reported.
  • Next-generation sequencing should be used in the Chinese population to increase the detection rate of carriers of Mendelian variants.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Expanded carrier screening with next-generation sequencing should be provided to Chinese people to identify carrier status of Mendelian variants for pregnancy planning.
 
 
Introduction
Carrier screening aims to identify couples at risk of conceiving children affected by recessive genetic diseases. Carrier couples of most recessive genetic conditions are typically asymptomatic, and the only way to identify them is by carrier screening. If a couple are both carriers of the same autosomal recessively inherited condition, their offspring have a 1 in 4 chance of being affected. The risk is as high as 1 in 2 in male offspring if the mother is an X-linked recessive carrier. Carrier screening facilitates informed prenatal testing options such as pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, prenatal invasive testing, and other reproductive options such as donor gametes and adoption for carrier couples. Prenatal genetic diagnosis could provide parents with more information, appropriate counselling, and preparation to take care of the child.1
 
Various carrier screening programmes targeting specific populations have been developed for single gene diseases such as cystic fibrosis, thalassaemia, and Tay-Sachs disease.2 3 The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) published guidelines on ethnically based carrier screening programmes, eg, screening for haemoglobinopathies in individuals of Southeast Asian, African and Mediterranean descent and screening for cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs disease, familial dysautonomia, and Canavan disease for individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.2 4 However, race and ethnicity can only be determined by patient self-report, and measures to ascertain ethnicity are restrictive.5 Ancestry-based screening could also lead to unequal distribution of genetic testing and may miss diagnosis of diseases in populations without screening.3 Thus, both the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and ACOG recommended carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in all couples in 2001.6 7 The ACMG and ACOG have also recommended carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in all couples since 2008 and 2017, respectively.8 9
 
With advancements in genomic technology providing access to next-generation sequencing (NGS), expanded screening panels that cover a wide variety of disorders could be offered to individuals regardless of ethnic background.9
 
The common mutations in the screening panel are mainly chosen based on studies performed in the Caucasian and Ashkenazi Jewish populations. Those known common mutations may not be ethnicity-specific and may not cover all mutations present in the Chinese population. Thus, the approach of sequencing the entire disease-causing gene would be more useful than the targeted common mutations approach for the Chinese population.
 
Studies that evaluate carrier frequencies and common mutations in the Chinese population are lacking in our locality. Further study to review carrier frequency and the identified variants in the Chinese population is essential to guide the future design of carrier screening platforms specific to the Chinese population and improve the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening for genetic diseases.
 
Methods
Subjects
Expanded carrier screening testing was offered to women who attended the subfertility clinic and pre-pregnancy counselling clinic of the study unit between March 2016 and March 2017. They were counselled about the prevalence and inheritance of recessive conditions, and the chance of having affected offspring for a silent carrier couple, using examples and figures. The purpose, testing methods, interpretation of results, potential benefits, risks, and limitations of the expanded carrier screening were also explained.
 
A generic consent form for the expanded carrier screening testing prepared by the laboratory was used. Consent for the use of data obtained for research or audit purposes was also obtained. The test was then ordered by the clinician as self-financed testing. The expanded carrier screening test was offered to both members of the couple separately during pre-test counselling. During post-test counselling, if a woman was identified to be a carrier of an autosomal recessive disease, but her partner had not completed the test, her partner was also counselled for carrier testing using the same method as self-financed testing. If both the male and female members of the couple were carriers of a same autosomal recessive disorder or the female was the carrier of an X-linked recessive disorder, they were identified as at-risk couples having the possibility of an affected pregnancy. Genetic counselling was arranged for at-risk couples to discuss reproductive options such as preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnostic testing. Finally, the carrier frequencies of individual diseases and the identified variants were reviewed. STROBE reporting guidelines were implemented in this manuscript.
 
Disease panels
The expanded carrier screening panel consisted of 104 conditions inherited in autosomal recessive or X-linked manner (online supplementary Appendix). The severity of these conditions ranged from debilitating diseases with neurological impairment (eg, SMA), reduced lifespan (eg, thalassaemia), or intellectual disability (eg, fragile X syndrome) to diseases requiring early intervention in the prenatal or early neonatal period (eg, 21-hydroxylase deficient congenital adrenal hyperplasia [CAH]).
 
Laboratory tests
The screening platform (Family Prep Screen 2.0; Counsyl, South San Francisco [CA], United States), which was reported by Lazarin et al,10 uses NGS techniques to analyse the listed exons, as well as selected intergenic and intronic regions, of the genes responsible for the recessive conditions. The selected regions were sequenced to high coverage and compared with standards and references of normal variation. High-throughput sequencing detects approximately 94% of known clinically significant variants according to the test provider. Variants classified as ‘predicted’ or ‘likely’ pathogenic have been reported.11 Fragile X specific polymerase chain reaction assay was used to determine the CGG repeat size in the 5' untranslated region of the FMR1 gene. Targeted copy number analysis was used to determine the copy number of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene. g.27134T>G variant testing for identification of silent SMA carriers is not included in this platform.12 The turnaround time of the test was approximately 3 weeks.
 
Results
A total of 123 Chinese women (age range, 20-45 years) opted for expanded carrier screening, and 69 (56.1%) of them were found to be carriers of at least one disease. Twenty of the women’s partners (29.0%, 20/69) were willing to complete the screening test after genetic counselling. Screening for possible carrier status before contemplating pregnancy was the indication in all individuals. Excluding one woman who was positive for fragile X syndrome, 48 women who screened positive opted not to screen their partners. Seventeen of them were solely carriers of alpha- or beta-thalassaemia (10 and 7, respectively), which could be accurately screened by mean corpuscular volume. The results also included 20 GJB2 carriers, especially the c.109G>A (p.Val37Ile) mutation, which has low penetrance and is prevalent in the Chinese population.13 14 Carrier status for CAH, SMA, Pendred’s syndrome, and other very rare diseases was found in three, one, one, and six individuals, respectively. After integrating partners’ data, 84 subjects (58.7%) were found to be carriers for at least one recessive disease, including thalassaemias. Excluding thalassaemias, 68 subjects (47.6%) were found to be carriers of at least one disease (Tables 1 and 2).
 

Table 1. Carrier frequency of genetic diseases identified in a cohort of 143 adults, listed according to their frequency and alphabetic order
 

Table 2. Frequency of multiple-disease carriers (n=143)
 
Prevalence of carriers of various diseases
A total of 24 recessive diseases were identified in 84 (58.7%) of the 143 subjects. The data are summarised in Table 1. The most common condition identified was GJB2-related hearing loss (frequency: 1 in 4). One subject was also found to be a homozygote for the p.V37I mutation in the GJB2 gene. The subject was aged 34 years and did not complain of hearing impairment at the time of recruitment. Both alpha- and beta-thalassaemia were prevalent in this cohort (1 in 7 and 1 in 14, respectively), as shown in Table 1. Eleven subjects (1 in 13) were identified as carriers of the 21-hydroxylase deficient type of CAH. Four subjects were heterozygous carriers of Pendred’s syndrome (1 in 36), and three subjects were heterozygous carriers for each of SMA and Krabbe’s disease (1 in 48). Two carriers were identified for both CLN5-related neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis and Fanconi’s anaemia type C, and one carrier was identified for each of 15 other recessive conditions (Table 1).
 
Multiple-disease carriers
The frequency of multiple-disease carriers is shown in Table 2. Carrier status of at least two recessive conditions was identified in 24 subjects (24/143, 16.8%) including thalassaemias and 11 subjects (7.7%) excluding thalassaemias.
 
At-risk couples
One woman was a fragile X syndrome premutation carrier, and 20 women had positive results for carrier status, and their male partners were sequentially tested. After integrating the sequential testing results, we identified nine at-risk couples, including three of alpha-thalassaemia, two of CAH, two of GJB2-related hearing loss, one of Pendred’s syndrome, and one of fragile X syndrome (Table 3). The rate of at-risk couples was 12.0% (9/75) overall and 8.0% (6/75) excluding thalassaemias.
 

Table 3. Diseases identified in nine at-risk couples
 
Comparison between traditional screening guidelines and next-generation sequencing
Forty three variants were identified by the NGS panel (Table 4). Of the 43 variants, 29 (67.4%) were not included in the ACMG or ACOG guidelines.9 11
 

Table 4. Identified variants of recessive diseases
 
Discussion
This study demonstrated the application of NGS to investigate carrier frequency status of members of the Chinese population in Hong Kong. The overall positive yield of this expanded carrier screening panel in our cohort was 58.7%. Not surprisingly, both alpha- and beta-thalassaemia account for a significant proportion of them. However, even after excluding thalassaemias that could be screened by mean corpuscular volume, the positive yield using NGS was still as high as 47.6%, with 6 out of 75 at-risk couples (8.0%) identified and potentially benefiting from further pre-conception genetic counselling.
 
Although NGS has been increasingly used for genetic carrier screening in Western countries in recent years, there is a scarcity of data about the carrier frequency of various recessive diseases in the Chinese population. In 2013, Lazarin et al10 reported the carrier frequencies of a sample of approximately 20 000 people from different ethnic groups using a targeted mutation panel. East Asians had the lowest carrier frequency (8.5%) compared with Ashkenazi Jews (43.6%) or Caucasians (21%-32.6%). The most common genetic disease identified among East Asians was GJB2-related hearing loss (1 in 22), followed by beta-thalassaemia/sickle cell disease (1 in 78) and SMA (1 in 85). However, the assay used by Lazarin et al10 was partially based on targeted genotyping, so carriers of variants other than the included common mutations were not detected. Thus, the reported carrier frequencies are likely underestimated, particularly among East Asians, as the common mutation panel was mainly based on the Caucasian and Ashkenazi Jewish populations. In particular, alpha-thalassaemia and CAH are not included in their panel.
 
Recently, Guo and Gregg15 investigated the carrier prevalence of 415 recessive diseases using an exome sequencing database of approximately 120 000 samples. The consistent finding is that Ashkenazi Jews had the highest carrier frequency (62.9%), followed by Caucasians, Africans, and Hispanics; South and East Asians had the lowest carrier frequency, but that frequency rose to 32.6% with a more comprehensive panel. However, because neither alpha-thalassaemia nor SMA was included in the panel, the most common diseases for which carrier status was found among East Asians were autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome type 1, beta-thalassaemia, Usher’s syndrome type IIa, and CAH. The carrier frequency of each of those diseases was 1% to 2%. In 2018, Zhao et al16 reported >10 000 mainland Chinese couples in whom NGS was used to screen for 11 recessive diseases. That study showed a high carrier frequency of 27.49%, and 2.4% of couples were carriers of the same genetic disease. The authors found that the diseases with the highest carrier frequencies were alpha-thalassaemia (15.1%), beta-thalassaemia (4.8%), phenylketonuria (3.6%), Wilson’s disease (2.0%), GJB2-related hearing loss (1.7%), and Pendred’s syndrome (1.6%). However, that study excluded SMA, CAH, and fragile X syndrome.16 Our study’s findings are distinguished from those of Lazarin et al,10 Guo and Gregg,15 and Zhao et al16 in that we observed a much higher carrier rate for GJB2-related hearing loss (28.0%), which is consistent with our previous report (15.9%) using target-enriched massively parallel sequencing.14 In addition, we found higher carrier frequencies for CAH (7.7%) and Pendred’s syndrome (2.8%). Our study observed carrier frequency for SMA (2.1%) is similar to that found in Western populations,17 18 19 20 21 indicating that SMA affects all ethnic groups.
 
One of the major limitations of our study was the small sample size. More data are required before we can draw precise conclusions regarding the carrier frequency of individual recessive conditions in the Chinese population. Second, patients in this cohort were referred for subfertility or pre-pregnancy counselling for genetic conditions, and give out of this 123-patient cohort had a positive family history, including thalassaemias, balanced translocation carriers, family history of autism, neonatal death, and previous pregnancy with structural abnormality. Thus, some of the results might have been over-represented. For example, one woman who presented with subfertility was discovered to be a fragile X permutation carrier, and this may have elevated the carrier frequency of fragile X in our cohort of 123 women. In our previous study, in which we used a robust polymerase chain reaction–based assay to quantify fragile X CGG repeats for screening of 3000 low-risk Chinese pregnant women, the permutation frequency was approximately 1 in 800.22 Another couple in the present study had a previous baby with neonatal death of unknown cause in Mainland China and were found to be 21-hydroxylase deficient CAH carriers. Nonetheless, even after excluding these two CAH cases, the CAH carrier frequency in our study (1 in 16) remains high.
 
Currently, both the ACOG and ACMG recommend carrier screening for SMA and cystic fibrosis only in individuals of East Asian ethnicity.7 9 If those ethnic-based carrier screening strategies advocated by the guidelines had been followed, many carriers and all five carrier couples identified in our cohort would have been missed. The results of our pilot study suggest that recessive genetic conditions may not be as uncommon as previously thought. Many of the diseases identified in our cohort are debilitating conditions that are associated with progressive neurological derangement and reduced life span, such as SMA, Krabbe’s disease, and biotinidase deficiency. More importantly, some conditions such as CAH may require intervention during the early prenatal or early neonatal periods to avoid irreversible complications. Hence, public and professional awareness of expanded carrier screening should be improved, and genetic counselling and expanded carrier screening should be an option for the Chinese population, especially in the setting of subfertility clinics.
 
Yet, genetic carrier screening has not been popular among the Chinese population or in Hong Kong because of the high cost of the test and the perceived low carrier rate in Chinese people. As the cost for NGS has dropped recently, and our pilot study demonstrated an overall high yield of 8.0% of couples at risk of conceiving foetuses with genetic diseases (even after excluding thalassaemias), further studies of couples are warranted. Potential candidates for expanded carrier screening in Hong Kong also include couples in consanguineous marriages, which are common in minor ethnic groups such as Pakistani and Indian. A recent local study showed that they had a higher prevalence of congenital abnormality (10.5%), unexplained intrauterine foetal demise (4.2%), and unexplained neonatal death (4.6%).23
 
In our cohort, NGS was used to analyse the listed exons, as well as selected intergenic and intronic regions, of the genes responsible for certain recessive conditions. The high-throughput sequencing technique was able to detect approximately 94% of known clinically significant variants irrespective of ethnicity. Of 43 variants identified using NGS, 29 (67.4%) were not included in the ACMG or ACOG guidelines. Thus, our study demonstrated that the NGS technique increased the detection rate of carrier status for recessive conditions in the Chinese population. Yet, further study with a larger sample size should be conducted to study the prevalence of carrier status, which conditions should be included, and ethical issues related to carrier screening testing such as reproductive options.
 
Conclusion
The observed carrier frequency in the Chinese population was 58.7% overall (47.6% after excluding thalassaemias) and was higher than previously reported. Expanded carrier screening using NGS should be provided to Chinese people to improve the detection rate of carrier status and facilitate optimal pregnancy planning.
 
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the concept or design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis or interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
As an editor of the journal, JPW Chung was not involved in the peer review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research project was partially funded by the Liauw’s Family Reproductive Genomics Programme.
 
Ethics approval
This study obtained ethical approval from The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kongew Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref CREC2019.138). All participants gave informed consent before the study.
 
References
1. Edwards JG, Feldman G, Goldberg J, et al. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:653-62. Crossref
2. ACOG Committee on Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:229-37. Crossref
3. Bajaj K, Gross SJ. Carrier screening: past, present and future. J Clin Med 2014;3:1033-42. Crossref
4. ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:950-3. Crossref
5. Eisenhower A, Suyemoto K, Lucchese F, Canenguez K. “Which box should I check?”: examining standard check box approaches to measuring race and ethnicity. Health Serv Res 2014;49:1034-55. Crossref
6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1028-31. Crossref
7. Watson MS, Cutting GR, Desnick RJ, et al. Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: 2004 revision of American College of Medical Genetics mutation panel. Genet Med 2004;6:387-91. Crossref
8. Prior TW, Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Genet Med 2008;10:840-2. Crossref
9. Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 691: carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e41-55. Crossref
10. Lazarin GA, Haque IS, Nazareth S, et al. An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23,453 individuals. Genet Med 2013;15:178-86. Crossref
11. Haque IS, Lazarin GA, Kang HP, Evans EA, Goldberg JD, Wapner RJ. Modeled fetal risk of genetic diseases identified by expanded carrier screening. JAMA 2016;316:734-42. Crossref
12. Feng Y, Ge X, Meng L, et al. The next generation of population-based spinal muscular atrophy carrier screening: comprehensive pan-ethnic SMN1 copy-number and sequence variant analysis by massively parallel sequencing. Genet Med 2017;19:936-44. Crossref
13. Shen J, Oza AM, Del Castillo I, et al. Consensus interpretation of the p.Met34Thr and p.Val37Ile variants in GJB2 by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel. Genet Med 2019;21:2442-52. Crossref
14. Choy KW, Cao Y, Lam ST, Lo FM, Morton CC, Leung TY. Target-enriched massively parallel sequencing for genetic diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss in patients with normal array CGH result. Hong Kong Med J 2018;24 Suppl 3:11-4.
15. Guo MH, Gregg AR. Estimating yields of prenatal carrier screening and implications for design of expanded carrier screening panels. Genet Med 2019;21:1940-7. Crossref
16. Zhao S, Xiang J, Fan C, et al. Pilot study of expanded carrier screening for 11 recessive diseases in China: results from 10,476 ethnically diverse couples. Eur J Hum Genet 2019;27:254-62. Crossref
17. Li C, Geng Y, Zhu X, et al. The prevalence of spinal muscular atrophy carrier in China: evidences from epidemiological surveys. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e18975. Crossref
18. Evans M, McCarthy M, Moore R, Karbassi I, Alagia DP, Lacbawan F. A comprehensive analysis of allele frequencies from 476,930 spinal muscular atrophy test results [23M]. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:147S. Crossref
19. Park JE, Yun S, Roh EY, Yoon JH, Shin S, Ki CS. Carrier frequency of spinal muscular atrophy in a large-scale Korean population. Ann Lab Med 2020;40:326-30. Crossref
20. Dejsuphong D, Taweewongsounton A, Khemthong P, et al. Carrier frequency of spinal muscular atrophy in Thailand. Neurol Sci 2019;40:1729-32. Crossref
21. Chen X, Sanchis-Juan A, French CE, et al. Spinal muscular atrophy diagnosis and carrier screening from genome sequencing data. Genet Med 2020;22:945-53. Crossref
22. Kwok YK, Wong KM, Lo FM, et al. Validation of a robust PCR-based assay for quantifying fragile X CGG repeats. Clin Chim Acta 2016;456:137-43. Crossref
23. Siong KH, Au Yeung SK, Leung TY. Parental consanguinity in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2019;25:192-200. Crossref

Pages