Filicide (child homicide by parents) in Hong Kong
Hong Kong Med J 2025;31:Epub 1 Apr 2025
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Filicide (child homicide by parents) in Hong Kong
Yuen Dorothy Yee Tang, MB, BS, FHKAM (Psychiatry)1; Jessica PY Lam, MB, BS, FHKAM (Psychiatry)2; Amy CY Liu, MB, ChB, FHKAM (Psychiatry)1; Bonnie WM Siu, MB, ChB, FHKAM (Psychiatry)1
1 Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Castle Peak Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
Corresponding author: Dr Yuen Dorothy Yee Tang (tyy551@ha.org.hk)

Abstract
Introduction: Filicide refers to an act in which a
parent or stepparent kills a child. This retrospective
study provides the first comprehensive analysis of
filicides in Hong Kong over a 15-year period.
Methods: The study explored the local epidemiology,
differences between maternal and paternal filicides,
associated mental illnesses, and the criminal
responsibility of the perpetrators.
Results: Among 81 filicide cases (43 female
victims, 37 male victims, and 1 victim of unknown
gender), the incidence rate was 0.7 per 100 000
population. Mothers were responsible for two-thirds
(66.7%) of the cases, fathers for 19.8%, and
the remainder involved both parents. Victims aged
<1 year (n=44) were nearly equal in number to
those aged between 1 and 17 years (n=41). Mental
illness was diagnosed in 31.0% of the perpetrators,
predominantly depression and psychotic disorders.
Paternal perpetrators exhibited a higher prevalence
of mental illness and were more frequently involved
in filicide-suicides. One-third (33%) of perpetrators
with mental illness invoked the psychiatric defence of diminished responsibility, resulting in Hospital
Order sentencing. Reduced culpability due to mental
illness and the application of infanticide provisions
provided legal protections for mothers who killed
their children aged <1 year.
Conclusion: Understanding the local epidemiology
of filicide and the mental health conditions of
perpetrators may help identify at-risk populations
and develop effective intervention strategies.
New knowledge added by this study
- The epidemiology, differences between maternal and paternal filicides, associated mental illnesses, and the criminal responsibility of the perpetrators in Hong Kong from 2003 to 2017 were explored.
- Maternal perpetrators were disproportionately responsible for infanticides, highlighting the protective legal provisions applied to mothers who kill their children aged <1 year.
- Understanding the local epidemiology of filicide and the mental health conditions of perpetrators may help identify at-risk populations and develop effective intervention strategies.
- Enhanced mental health screening and support for parents, particularly mothers of infants, could potentially prevent cases of filicide.
Introduction
Child homicide represents a rare but important
global issue with devastating consequences for
families and communities. The global homicide
rate among children aged 0 to 17 years was 1.6 per
100 000 population in 2016,1 and approximately
95 000 children are murdered annually.2 A 2017
review by Stöckl et al3 found that the majority of child
homicides were committed by a family member;
parents were responsible for over half of the cases
involving child victims.3
Filicide
Filicide refers to the act of killing one’s own child.
Subcategories of filicide include neonaticide, a term introduced by Resnick4 to describe the murder of
a child within the first 24 hours after birth, and
infanticide, which applies when the victim is aged <1
year. Resnick4 identified various motives for filicide. In
altruistic filicide, the parent believes that the act is in
the child’s best interests. An acutely psychotic parent
may kill a child under the influence of severe mental
illness. In unwanted child filicide, a parent kills a child
who is perceived as a hindrance. Accidental/fatal
maltreatment describes the unintentional death of a
child due to parental abuse or neglect. Spouse revenge
filicide occurs when a child is killed as a means
of exacting revenge upon the spouse or the other
parent. Bourget and Bradford5 later emphasised the
importance of the perpetrator’s gender by introducing
paternal filicide as a distinct category.
Victim and perpetrator characteristics
vary in cases of filicide. The first year of life is
a critical period, and the highest risk of filicide
occurs within the first 24 hours. Neonaticides are
predominantly committed by mothers,6 and mothers
are overrepresented across the entire spectrum of
filicide.4 5 However, contradictory results have been
reported.5 7 8 The gender distribution of victims also
varies. Male children aged <1 year are at greater risk
in high-income Western countries, such as the US9
and the UK10; the opposite trend has been observed
in India and China.11 Some studies have shown that
boys are overrepresented among victims,7 12 whereas
others have identified comparable numbers of male
and female filicide victims.13
Maternal and paternal perpetrators of filicide
exhibit distinct characteristics.14 15 Maternal
perpetrators tend to be younger and have younger
victims compared with fathers.15 Younger maternal
perpetrators are often poor, experience psychosocial
stress, and lack family and community support,
whereas older maternal perpetrators frequently have
mental illnesses and lack criminal histories.13 14 16 In
contrast, paternal perpetrators are more commonly
driven by anger, jealousy, or marital and life
discord.15 Fatal abuse and acts of retaliation are more
prevalent among paternal perpetrators than among
maternal perpetrators.17 Fathers are also more likely
to attempt or die by suicide12 17 18 when committing
filicide.14 18 Additionally, fathers typically use more violent methods to cause death.19
Filicide and mental illness
Pathological filicide, characterised by altruistic or actively psychotic motives, constitutes one
of the most common categories of filicide.17
Psychiatric factors are involved in 36% to 85% of
all filicide cases.5 16 20 21 22 Maternal perpetrators are
more likely to have a history of mental illness and
to exhibit symptoms at the time of the offence.22
The most frequent diagnosis among maternal
perpetrators is major depressive disorder, followed
by schizophrenia.5 16 20 23 Personality disorders and substance use are more often associated with
paternal filicides.8
The criminal justice system and infanticide
laws
Filicide presents unique challenges for the criminal
justice system. Societal attitudes regarding parents
who kill their children are often ambivalent,
balancing the need for justice due to loss of innocent
life against calls for mercy towards offenders who
may require care rather than punishment.
Legal systems worldwide acknowledge that
filicide should be treated differently from other forms
of homicide. The UK enacted the Infanticide Act in
1922 (amended in 1938)24 to recognise the biological
vulnerability of women to psychiatric illnesses
during the perinatal period. The Act mandated
sentences of probation and psychiatric treatment for
offenders.24 By the late 20th century, 29 countries had
revised penalties for infanticide to consider unique
biological and psychological changes associated with
childbirth.25
In Hong Kong, perpetrators with mental
illnesses can invoke psychiatric defences, including
insanity or diminished responsibility. The insanity
defence is based on the M’Naghten principles, which
hold that it is unjust to punish an individual for an
action performed without the mental capacity to
control it. The defence of diminished responsibility
applies when the offender demonstrates abnormal
mental function arising from a recognised medical
condition, which has substantially impaired their
ability to either understand the nature of their
conduct, form a rational judgement, or exercise self-control
(or any combination of these impairments).
Perpetrators with mental illnesses who are found not
guilty by reason of insanity, or who successfully raise
the partial defence of diminished responsibility—thereby reducing the charge from murder to
manslaughter—may be sentenced to a Hospital
Order at the Correctional Services Department
Psychiatric Centre (Siu Lam Psychiatric Centre
[SLPC]), under Section 75 of the Criminal Procedure
Ordinance26 or Section 45 of the Mental Health
Ordinance,27 respectively, for psychiatric observation
and management.
A separate legal provision exists for mothers
who kill their children aged <1 year. Hong Kong has
adopted the UK concept of infanticide, in which mothers experiencing vulnerability after childbirth
are charged with infanticide rather than murder,
under Section 47C of the Offences against the Person
Ordinance.28
A study has shown that the local homicide rate
in Hong Kong is lower than global averages (0.32 vs
6.1 victims per 100 000 population in 2017),29 but no
filicide-specific data are available. The underlying
hypothesis in this study was that the incidence
of filicide would be lower in Hong Kong than in
Western countries, consistent with the lower local
homicide rate and the protective effects of cultural
factors. The objectives of this study were to describe
the epidemiology of filicide in Hong Kong, examine
the characteristics of victims and perpetrators
(including associated mental illnesses), and evaluate
the local criminal justice system’s response to
infanticide and other forms of filicide.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Hong Kong Police Force
regarding child homicide cases that occurred from
2003 to 2017. These data included the age and gender
of the victim, relationship of the perpetrator to the
victim, mode of death, year of offence, and charges
against the defendant along with corresponding
outcomes and sentences. Medical records from the
Hospital Authority and the SLPC of the Correctional
Services Department were reviewed to determine
any history of mental illness. Psychiatric diagnoses
of the perpetrators, based on the International
Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, were
documented during forensic psychiatric assessments
conducted by two psychiatrists, at least one of whom
was a specialist. For the minority of defendants who
were not sent to psychiatric hospitals or SLPC after
the offences, the presence or absence of mental
illness was cross-referenced using newspaper
articles. Charges and sentences were verified
through judgements available on the Judiciary’s
official website.
All statistical analyses were performed using
SPSS software (Windows version 21.0; IBM Corp,
Armonk [NY], US). Data were analysed with
descriptive statistics, including the mean, median,
standard deviation, 95% confidence interval, and
percentages for categorical variables. Differences
between groups in demographic characteristics
were assessed using t tests and univariate analysis of
variance for continuous data. For nominal data, the
Kruskal–Wallis and Chi squared tests were utilised.
Results
Epidemiology of child homicide
From 2003 to 2017, 107 child homicide victims were
recorded in Hong Kong, equating to approximately
0.70 death per 100 000 population, based on a population of 1 024 000 children aged <18 years in
2010.30 Among these victims, 81 (75.7%) were killed
by their parents (Fig).
Characteristics of victims and perpetrators
Among the filicide victims (n=81), 53.1% were
female, 45.7% were male, and the gender of the
remaining victim was unknown. There was no
significant correlation between the gender of the
victim and the gender of the perpetrator (χ2=0.13;
P=0.82). The median age of the victims was 6 years
(interquartile range [IQR]=0-8) [Table 1].
Of the 81 filicide victims, 54 (66.7%) were killed
by their mothers, 16 (19.8%) by their fathers, and 11
(13.6%) by both parents. The median age of victims
varied across perpetrator groups; the paternal group
victims had a median age of 7.5 years (IQR=5-10.25),
compared with 0 year (IQR=0-3.5) for the maternal
group and 2 years (IQR=0-5) for the parental couple
group (H2=14.31; P<0.001).
Characteristics of infanticide and other
filicide cases
Forty victims aged <1 year were killed by 44 perpetrators, and 41 victims aged ≥1 year were killed
by 40 perpetrators. No significant gender differences
were observed among the victims (Table 1).
The median age of paternal perpetrators,
43.5 years, was significantly older than the median
ages of maternal and parental couple perpetrators
(H2=16.50; P<0.001). The median age of offenders
in the infanticide group was younger than that of
offenders in the other filicide group. In the infanticide
group, nine mothers (26.5%) were <20 years, and all
pregnancies had been concealed. These infants were
killed immediately after birth. Single offenders were
more prevalent in the infanticide group, whereas
married offenders were more common in the other
filicide group. Biological mothers were the main
perpetrators in both groups; similar to paternal and
couple perpetrators, maternal perpetrators were
younger in the infanticide group (Table 2). The
maternal group was responsible for 40% of victims
aged <4 years, compared with 7.1% in the paternal
group. A higher prevalence of mental illness was
identified among perpetrators, particularly mothers,
in the other filicide group. Among perpetrators
in the infanticide group, depression (40%) was the
most common diagnosis, followed by a psychotic
disorder (20%), mental and behavioural disorders
due to psychoactive substance use (20%), and mental
retardation (20%). The only biological father in the
infanticide group was diagnosed with harmful use of
alcohol. In the other filicide group, among maternal
perpetrators, 25.0% had a psychotic disorder, 18.8%
had depression, 6.4% had bipolar affective disorder,
and the remainder had unknown diagnoses. Among
paternal perpetrators, 18.0% had depression, 9.1%
had a psychotic disorder, and the remainder had
undocumented diagnoses.
Suffocation or strangulation was the most
common mode of death in infanticides, occurring
in 95.7% of cases with maternal perpetrators. In
contrast, paternal perpetrators (100%) and couples
(50%) caused death mainly by bashing, throwing, or
shaking the infants. The two most common modes
of death across all filicides were drug overdose or
poisoning (including charcoal burning) and stabbing.
Drug overdose or poisoning was most frequently
performed by maternal perpetrators (36.8%) and
couples (57.1%), whereas paternal perpetrators most
often engaged in stabbing (57.1%).
Excluding the four perpetrators who died by
suicide, 80.0% of perpetrators in the infanticide group
faced criminal charges and were convicted. The most
common convictions were concealing the birth of a
child, manslaughter, and infanticide (Table 2). In the
other filicide group, excluding the 18 perpetrators
who died by suicide, 95.5% of perpetrators were charged and convicted; manslaughter was the most
common conviction, followed by murder. Sentences
significantly differed between the infanticide and
other filicide groups. Noncustodial sentences were
more frequent in the infanticide group than in the
other filicide group. Given the higher prevalence
of mental illness in the other filicide group, 33.3%
(5/15) of the perpetrators were convicted of
manslaughter under diminished responsibility and
sentenced to a Hospital Order, compared with 6.3%
in the infanticide group (Table 2). Among paternal
and couple perpetrators, 80% in the infanticide
group and 92.3% in the other filicide group received
prison sentences, ranging from 3 to 10 years and 18
months to life imprisonment, respectively. Similar
proportions of maternal perpetrators in both
groups—41.0% in the infanticide group and 42.9% in
the other filicide group—were imprisoned. Among
maternal perpetrators in the infanticide group,
all but one received prison sentences of <1 year;
the exception received an 8-year sentence. In the
other filicide group, maternal perpetrators received
sentences of 4 to 7 years.
Filicide-suicide is defined as the perpetrator
dying by suicide within 24 hours of committing
filicide. A significantly greater proportion of filicide-suicides
occurred in the other filicide group. In the
infanticide group, all perpetrators were biological
mothers. In contrast, within the other filicide group,
half of maternal perpetrators and 66.7% of paternal
perpetrators had a diagnosed mental illness. The
difference in mental illness prevalence between the
two groups was not statistically significant (Table 3).
Mental illness of filicide offenders
Of the 84 filicide perpetrators, 26 (31.0%) were
diagnosed with mental illness. No mental illness
was reported in the parental couple group. A higher
prevalence of mental illness was observed among
paternal perpetrators (58.3%) than among maternal
perpetrators (38.0%), although the difference was
not statistically significant. Depression was the most
common diagnosis, followed by psychotic disorder.
In cases of filicide-suicide, mental illness prevalence
was higher among paternal perpetrators; this
difference was not statistically significant (Table 4).
Excluding perpetrators who died by suicide,
41.7% of maternal perpetrators with mental illness
received a Hospital Order for an unspecified period.
Among the three paternal perpetrators with mental
illness who did not die by suicide, only one (33.3%)
was sentenced to a Hospital Order for an unspecified
period.
Discussion
The incidence of child homicide in Hong Kong, at
0.7 per 100 000 population, is lower than the global average (1.6 per 100 000 population)1 and lower than
that of Asian countries with similar socio-economic
status, such as South Korea (1.03 per 100 000
population).31 The protective influence of traditional
Confucian cultural values may play a prominent role
in Hong Kong.32 An idiom from the Sung dynasty,
‘even a vicious tiger would not eat its cubs’, continues
to be taught in modern primary schools. This cultural
ethos could explain why the incidence of child
maltreatment in Hong Kong, at <0.14%,30 remains
lower than the global rate of 0.3% to 0.4%.33 Consistent
with studies worldwide,3 most child homicides in
Hong Kong were perpetrated by parents. Mothers
were the predominant perpetrators in filicides. The
typical profile of an infanticidal perpetrator was a
young, single mother who suffocated or strangled
the infant. Some cases may represent neonaticides,
as suggested by charges of concealing the birth of
a child. Among cases involving the filicide of older
children, perpetrator characteristics were more
heterogeneous. Perpetrators tended to be older and
married; they used methods such as overdosing,
poisoning, or stabbing. The profiles of perpetrators
and victims in this group also differed. The median
age of maternal perpetrators was younger and their
victims tended to be younger. Mothers most often
caused death through overdosing or poisoning,
whereas fathers were more likely to kill by stabbing.
Mental illness in filicides
In the present study, 31.0% of filicidal perpetrators
had a diagnosed mental illness, a lower rate
compared with other population studies.8 20 22 23 This discrepancy could be attributed to the lower
prevalence of mental illness in Hong Kong. The
Hong Kong Mental Morbidity Survey (2010-2013)
revealed a 13.3% prevalence of mental disorders
among Chinese adults,34 compared with 18.5%
among adults in the US in 2013.35 It is also plausible
that some perpetrators, especially those involved
in filicide-suicide cases, had no prior contact
with mental health services and may have had
undiagnosed psychiatric illnesses. Mental illness
prevalence was higher among paternal perpetrators
than among maternal perpetrators in our filicide
sample. This finding may be related to the small
sample size or could reflect societal changes, such as
fathers assuming greater childcare responsibilities.17
Consistent with some studies,20 22 depression was
the most common diagnosis, followed by psychotic
disorder.
Filicide-suicides
Substantial proportions of filicide perpetrators
(23.0% of maternal and 34.8% of paternal) died by
suicide during or after committing the act. Charcoal
burning was the most common method, comparable
to the frequency of jumping from height. Charcoal
burning is a relatively recent suicidal method,36 which
has spread as a contagious phenomenon in other
Asian countries; it is often portrayed as a ‘peaceful
way of dying’ and has been used during >10% of
suicides in the region.37 The proportion of filicide-suicides
observed in this study was lower than that
reported in other studies.17 23 This difference may be
related to the lower prevalence of mental illness in our sample, the relatively lower lethality of charcoal
burning in Hong Kong compared with firearm use in
Western countries, or the possibility that attempted
suicides not resulting in death were not captured in
our data. Filicide-suicide events were more frequent
in cases involving older children than in infanticides,
potentially due to differences in underlying motives.
Half of the filicide-suicide perpetrators in the present
study had a history of mental illness, suggesting that
altruistic motives were involved. Depression was
the most frequently diagnosed condition in these
cases.18 20
The local law and filicides
The majority of perpetrators with mental illness
were convicted of manslaughter under diminished
responsibility and sentenced to a Hospital Order
at SLPC for an unspecified period under Section
45 of the Mental Health Ordinance.27 No insanity pleas were recorded in our sample. Consistent with
international studies,38 maternal perpetrators in
Hong Kong received more lenient outcomes relative
to paternal perpetrators. Some young mothers who
killed their children aged <1 year were released
without charge; among those convicted, a few
received noncustodial sentences. In contrast, all
fathers who killed their children were imprisoned,
with the exception of one who was sentenced to a
Hospital Order at SLPC.
Hong Kong developed its legislation based
on the UK law, including the British Infanticide Act
of 1922.21 24 Section 47C of the Offences against the
Person Ordinance28 defines the offence of infanticide
as follows: “Where a woman by any wilful act or
omission causes the death of her child being a child
under the age of 12 months but at the time of the act
or omission the balance of her mind was disturbed
by reason of her not having fully recovered from the
effect of giving birth to the child or by reason of the effect of lactation consequent upon the birth of the
child, then, notwithstanding that the circumstances
were such that but for the provisions of this section
the offence would have amounted to murder, she
shall be guilty of infanticide, and shall be liable to
be punished as if she were guilty of manslaughter.”
In the present study, eight mothers who killed
their children aged <1 year were convicted under
the infanticide provision. There appears to be
considerable application of this provision in Hong
Kong; lenient noncustodial sentences are issued to
mothers in such cases.
Limitations
First, information provided by the Police was
restricted to arrest cases; thus, the study may
underreport the true incidence of filicides in
Hong Kong. Second, although multiple sources
of information were utilised, details regarding the
perpetrators’ and victims’ abuse or victimisation
histories, involvement with social services, or autopsy
reports were unavailable. Third, the classification of
neonaticides was challenging, although charges of
concealing the birth of a child may indicate the death
of a victim within 24 hours of birth. Fourth, although
most diagnoses of offenders with mental illnesses
were accessible, the availability of psychiatric records
was limited. Information for a small number of cases
(<5) was obtained from newspaper reports. Sixth,
the absence of critical details, such as the onset of
mental illness, symptomatology, and medication
adherence, impeded a thorough exploration of the
relationship between mental illness and filicides. A
more comprehensive approach, such as conducting
psychological autopsies—particularly in filicide-suicide
cases—would provide deeper insights.
Finally, the sample size was insufficient to allow
for robust comparisons among perpetrators in
maternal, paternal, parental couple, and stepparent
filicide groups.
Conclusion
In this study, most child homicides were perpetrated
by parents; mothers committed filicide more
frequently than fathers. Maternal perpetrators and
their victims were younger than their counterparts
in the paternal perpetrator group. Mental illness
was prevalent among filicidal perpetrators of both
genders, with a higher prevalence in paternal
perpetrators. Filicide-suicide is a substantial problem.
Psychiatrists should remain vigilant in identifying
depressed or psychotic parents and in eliciting self-harm
or filicidal ideations among both mothers and
fathers. Social support and child protection services
should be actively offered to young single mothers.
In Hong Kong, a comprehensive child development
service has been established since 2005,39 with the aim of identifying and intervening early in cases that
involve children and mothers in need; this service
seeks to improve health outcomes for children and
families. However, no local policies specifically
address the needs of fathers. A multidisciplinary
approach involving mental health professionals
and social workers is recommended to screen
fathers experiencing mental illness or distress
and to identify early warning signs of risk. Finally,
given the high prevalence of mental illness among
filicidal perpetrators, forensic psychiatrists and
related professionals should maintain a high index
of suspicion for the presence of mental illness when
evaluating filicidal offenders.
Author contributions
Concept or design: All authors.
Acquisition of data: YDY Tang.
Analysis or interpretation of data: YDY Tang, JPY Lam.
Drafting of the manuscript: YDY Tang.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: YDY Tang.
Acquisition of data: YDY Tang.
Analysis or interpretation of data: YDY Tang, JPY Lam.
Drafting of the manuscript: YDY Tang.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: YDY Tang.
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethics approval
This research was approved by the New Territories West
Cluster Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Authority,
Hong Kong (Ref No.: NTWC/REC/19021). A waiver for
informed patient consent was granted by the Committee due
to the retrospective nature of the research.
References
1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global Study
on Homicide. Killing of Children and Young Adults. 2019.
Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/Booklet_6new.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
2. UNICEF. Hidden in plain sight: a statistical analysis of
violence against children. New York: United Nations
International Children’s Emergency Fund. 2014 Sep 4.
Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/hidden-in-plain-sight-a-statistical-analysis-of-violence-against-children/. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
3. Stöckl H, Dekel B, Morris-Gehring A, Watts C, Abrahams N.
Child homicide perpetrators worldwide: a systematic
review. BMJ Paediatr Open 2017;1:e000112. Crossref
4. Resnick PJ. Child murder by parents: a psychiatric review
of filicide. Am J Psychiatry 1969;126:325-34. Crossref
5. Bourget D, Bradford JM. Homicidal parents. Can J
Psychiatry 1990;35:233-8. Crossref
6. Wilson RF, Klevens J, Fortson B, Williams D, Xu L, Yuan K. Neonaticides in the United States—2008-2017. Acad Forensic Pathol 2022;12:3-14. Crossref
7. Vanamo T, Kauppi A, Karkola K, Merikanto J, Räsänen E.
Intra-familial child homicide in Finland 1970-1994:
incidence, causes of death and demographic characteristics.
Forensic Sci Int 2001;117:199-204. Crossref
8. Bourget D, Gagné P. Paternal filicide in Québec. J Am Acad
Psychiatry Law 2005;33:354-60.
9. Mariano TY, Chan HC, Myers WC. Toward a more holistic
understanding of filicide: a multidisciplinary analysis of 32
years of U.S. arrest data. Forensic Sci Int 2014;236:46-53. Crossref
10. Brookman F, Nolan J. The dark figure of infanticide in
England and Wales: complexities of diagnosis. J Interpers
Violence 2006;21:869-89. Crossref
11. Sahni M, Verma N, Narula D, Varghese RM, Sreenivas V,
Puliyel JM. Missing girls in India: infanticide, feticide
and made-to-order pregnancies? Insights from hospital-based
sex-ratio-at-birth over the last century. PLoS One
2008;3:e2224. Crossref
12. Dawson M. Canadian trends in filicide by gender of the
accused, 1961–2011. Child Abuse Negl 2015;47:162-74. Crossref
13. Camperio Ciani AS, Fontanesi L. Mothers who kill their
offspring: testing evolutionary hypothesis in a 110-case
Italian sample. Child Abuse Negl 2012;36:519-27. Crossref
14. Harris GT, Hilton NZ, Rice ME, Eke AW. Children killed
by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evol Hum Behav
2007;28:85-95. Crossref
15. West SG, Friedman SH, Resnick PJ. Fathers who kill
their children: an analysis of the literature. J Forensic Sci
2009;54:463-8. Crossref
16. Friedman SH, Horwitz SM, Resnick PJ. Child murder by
mothers: a critical analysis of the current state of knowledge
and a research agenda. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:1578-87. Crossref
17. Bourget D, Grace J, Whitehurst L. A review of maternal and
paternal filicide. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2007;35:74-82.
18. Hatters Friedman S, Hrouda DR, Holden CE, Noffsinger SG,
Resnick PJ. Filicide-suicide: common factors in parents
who kill their children and themselves. J Am Acad
Psychiatry Law 2005;33:496-504.
19. West SG, Hatters Friedman S. Filicide: a research update.
In: Browne RC, editor. Forensic Psychiatry Research
Trends. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2007: 29-62.
20. Bourget D, Gagné P. Maternal filicide in Québec. J Am
Acad Psychiatry Law 2002;30:345-51.
21. Hatters Friedman S, Resnick PJ. Child murder by mothers:
patterns and prevention. World Psychiatry 2007;6:137-41.
22. Flynn SM, Shaw JJ, Abel KM. Filicide: mental illness in
those who kill their children. PLoS One 2013;8:e58981. Crossref
23. Kauppi A, Kumpulainen K, Karkola K, Vanamo T,
Merikanto J. Maternal and paternal filicides: a retrospective
review of filicides in Finland. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law
2010;38:229-38.
24. Legislation.gov.uk. Infanticide Act 1938. Available from:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/1-2/36. Accessed 25 Mar 2025.
25. Oberman M. Mothers who kill: coming to terms with
modern American infanticide. Am Crim L Rev 1996;34:1-110.
26. Hong Kong SAR Government. Criminal Procedure
Ordinance (Cap 221). Available from: https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap221. Accessed 17 Mar 2025.
27. Hong Kong SAR Government. Mental Health Ordinance
(Cap 136). Available from: https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap136. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
28. Hong Kong SAR Government. Offences against the
Person Ordinance (Cap 212). Available from: https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap212. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
29. Hong Kong Police Force. Crime statistics comparison.
2017. Available from: https://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_en/09_statistics/csc.html. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
30. Child Fatality Review Panel, Social Welfare Department,
Hong Kong SAR Government. Second report for child
death cases in 2010-2011. July 2015. Available from:
https://www.swd.gov.hk/storage/asset/section/655/en/fcw/CFRP2R-Eng.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
31. Jung K, Kim H, Lee E, et al. Cluster analysis of child homicide
in South Korea. Child Abuse Negl 2020;101:104322. Crossref
32. Lassi N. A Confucian theory of crime [dissertation].
University of North Dakota; 2018.
33. Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Alink LR,
van IJzendoorn MH. The prevalence of child maltreatment
across the globe: review of a series of meta-analyses. Child
Abuse Rev 2015;24:37-50. Crossref
34. Lam LC, Wong CS, Wang MJ, et al. Prevalence, psychosocial
correlates and service utilization of depressive and anxiety
disorders in Hong Kong: the Hong Kong Mental Morbidity
Survey (HKMMS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
2015;50:1379-88. Crossref
35. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality,
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, US Department of Health and Human
Services. Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug
Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. November
2014. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHmhfr2013/NSDUHmhfr2013.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
36. The Hong Kong Jockey Club Centre for Suicide Research
and Prevention, The University of Hong Kong. Statistics
of suicide data in Hong Kong (by year). Distribution
of method of suicide by age group in Hong Kong. 2020.
Available from: https://www.csrp.hku.hk/statistics/. Accessed 6 Apr 2023.
37. Chang SS, Chen YY, Yip PS, Lee WJ, Hagihara A, Gunnell D.
Regional changes in charcoal-burning suicide rates in East/
Southeast Asia from 1995 to 2011: a time trend analysis.
PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001622. Crossref
38. Porter T, Gavin H. Infanticide and neonaticide: a review
of 40 years of research literature on incidence and causes.
Trauma Violence Abuse 2010;11:99-112. Crossref
39. Education Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government.
Comprehensive Child Development Service. 2021.
Available from: https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/preprimary-kindergarten/comprehensive-child-development-service/index.html. Accessed 18 Mar 2025.