OBJECTIVE. To investigate whether requests for standard paediatric electroencephalograms accord with guideline recommendations, subsequent changes in clinical management according to reported results, and extent to which the service meets waiting time targets.

DESIGN. Case series.

SETTING. Regional hospital, Hong Kong.

PATIENTS. All patients aged less than 18 years who underwent electroencephalography between December 2009 and February 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Appropriateness of the electroencephalogram request and the impact of its findings on clinical management.

RESULTS. A total of 109 patients were recruited, but requests for standard electroencephalograms were considered 'inappropriate' with respect to guidelines in 44% of the patients, of which 50% were made to diagnose 'funny turns'. The standard electroencephalogram contributed to the diagnosis or management in only 28% of patients. In all of the latter, the request for an electroencephalogram had been appropriate. Non-specialists made referrals for 86% of the patients. Inadequate information was provided in 66% of the requests. Standard electroencephalograms were performed within guideline targets, the wait being less than 4 weeks in 95% of requests.

CONCLUSION. An effective electroencephalogram service was being provided, though abuses were common. These were mainly because of misconceptions regarding the role and limitations of standard electroencephalograms. Through an educative, non-confrontational approach, and with time to explain guideline recommendations to clinicians, sustainable change in practice could be achieved so as to benefit patients, clinicians, and service provision.

Key words: Child; Electroencephalography; Hospitals, district; Practice guidelines as topic; Utilization review

View this abstract indexed in MEDLINE:

OBJECTIVE. To study the success rate, predictors for success, and pregnancy outcomes after external cephalic version.

DESIGN. Historical cohort study.

SETTING. Regional hospital, Hong Kong.

PATIENTS. All women who had singleton term breech pregnancies at term and opted for external cephalic version during 2001 and 2009. Their demographic data, clinical and ultrasound findings, procedure details, complications, and delivery outcomes were analysed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Predictive factors for successful external cephalic version.

RESULTS. A total of 209 external cephalic versions were performed during the 9-year period. The success rate was 63% (75% for multiparous and 53% for nulliparous women). There was no significant complication. On univariate analysis, predictors of successful external cephalic version were: multiparity, unengaged presenting part, higher amniotic fluid index (≥10 cm), thin abdominal wall, low uterine tone, and easily palpable fetal head (subjective assessment by practitioners before external cephalic version). On multivariate analysis, only multiparity, non-engagement of the fetal buttock and thin maternal abdomen were associated with successful external cephalic version. In all, 69% of those who had successful external cephalic version succeeded in the first roll (P<0.001), and 82% of the women with successful external cephalic versions had vaginal deliveries (93% in multiparous and 69% in nulliparous women). Uptake rate of external cephalic version was studied in the latter part of the study period (2006-2009). Whilst 735 women were eligible for external cephalic version, 131 women chose to have the procedure resulting in an uptake rate of 18%.

CONCLUSION. External cephalic version was effective in reducing breech presentations at term and corresponding caesarean section rates, but the uptake rate was low. Further work should address the barriers to the low acceptance of external cephalic version. The results of this study could encourage women to opt for external cephalic version.

Key words: Breech presentation; Cesarean section; Version, fetal

View this abstract indexed in MEDLINE:

OBJECTIVE. To audit secondary preventive care in non-acute stroke patients in a local General Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital Authority.

DESIGN. Comparison of two samples from a case series at different time-points.

SETTING. General Outpatient Clinic, Hong Kong.

PATIENTS. Non-acute stroke patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and regularly followed up in a local General Outpatient Clinic during the audit cycle were recruited. Evidence-based audit criteria and performance standards were established after thorough literature review. A sample from this case series was compared retrospectively at two time-points. First-phase evaluation was performed in October 2009 and deficiencies were identified. After 9 months of active intervention, second-phase evaluation was performed in July 2010. Chi squared test and student's t test were used to compare the significance of relevant changes noted.

RESULTS. First-phase data showed marked deficiencies in proper assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. Satisfactory blood pressure, glucose and lipid control was evident only in 47% of the hypertensive, 45% of the diabetic, and 37% of the dyslipidaemic stroke patients, respectively. After 9 months of implementing changes, significant improvements were noted with respect to standard targets being achieved. In the second phase, more comprehensive tackling of cardiovascular risk factors was noted, with satisfactory blood pressure control in 73% of hypertensive patients, and adequate metabolic control in 62% diabetic patients (P<0.01 for both). Only 59% of the dyslipidaemic stroke patients had optimal lipid control, though their mean low-density lipoprotein concentration was significantly reduced (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION. This study provided a valuable lesson in identifying deficiencies in secondary prevention for stroke patients managed in a local primary care facility. Using a team approach intervention, quality assurance was promoted and a definite impact on patient care was demonstrated.

Key words: Cardiovascular diseases; Guideline adherence; Hypertension; Secondary prevention; Stroke

View this abstract indexed in MEDLINE:

OBJECTIVE. Paediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire is a health-related assessment tool designed for children with allergic diseases. This study aimed to translate the original English version of the Questionnaire to Chinese and to provide psychometric evidence on the validity and reliability of the translated version.

DESIGN. Cross-sectional study.

SETTING. Out-patient clinic of a non-teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

PARTICIPANTS. The Paediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire was translated to Chinese and then completed by a group of 115 Hong Kong Chinese children (66 male and 49 female; mean age, 11 years) with allergic disease(s). All subjects were asked to respond using visual analogue scales dealing with issues related to the perceived morbidity of allergic diseases. To assess test-retest reliability, 2 weeks later a subgroup of 16 individuals was retested with the same Questionnaire.

RESULTS. The internal consistency of the Chinese Paediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire was satisfactory (Cronbach alpha=0.92). The correlation between the total Questionnaire score and the visual analogue scale score was moderately significant (Spearman's rho=0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62). Structural validity as studied by confirmatory factor analysis found that the structure of subscales was remarkably similar to the original English version. The intra-class correlation between the Questionnaire score from the first and the second test in the subgroup of 16 subjects was 0.75, indicating adequate repeatability.

CONCLUSION. The validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Paediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire was established for clinical use.

Key words: Asthma; Child; Eczema; Quality of life; Rhinitis, allergic, perennial

View this abstract indexed in MEDLINE:

OBJECTIVES. To determine the period prevalence, demographic characteristics, cost of treatment, and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for continuous renal replacement therapy.

DESIGN. Descriptive case series.

SETTING. Intensive Care Unit in a Hong Kong tertiary referral, teaching hospital.

PATIENTS. All patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit from January to December 2007 who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Period prevalence of continuous renal replacement therapy, patient demographic data, referral sources by specialty and hospital location, diagnosis, daily cost of disposable items, duration of renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital mortality.

RESULTS. Of 1652 patients admitted to the intensive care unit over a 12-month period, 131 (8%) underwent continuous renal replacement therapy, of whom 56% were admitted from general wards (the department of medicine being the source of 59% of referrals). The median age of these continuous renal replacement therapy patients was 67 (interquartile range, 55-76) years, with a slight male predominance (66%). The mean APACHE II score of the patients was 29 (standard deviation, 7). Chronic renal failure requiring either haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis was present in 20/131 (15%) patients. Sepsis was the diagnosis most commonly associated with renal failure deemed to warrant continuous renal replacement therapy (43%). The median duration of such continuous therapy was 55 (interquartile range, 25-93) hours and the median intensive care unit length of stay was 120 (interquartile range, 51-289) hours. The mean daily cost of disposables for the provision of continuous renal replacement therapy was HK$3510. The overall intensive care unit mortality of patients having continuous renal replacement therapy was 38% and the hospital mortality was 53%. The corresponding rates for patients with acute renal failure were 45% and 56%, respectively. Patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy had prolonged intensive care unit stays (120 vs 24 hours; P<0.05) and higher corresponding hospital mortality rates (53% vs 20%; P<0.001) compared to those not having such therapy.

CONCLUSION. The 8% period prevalence of patients admitted to the intensive care unit undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy was somewhat higher than in recently published reports in the international literature. However intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates for such patients were lower than previously reported. The corresponding total daily cost of relevant disposables was similar to costs reported internationally, whilst the length of intensive care unit stays for our cohort were relatively short.

Key words: Acute kidney injury; Intensive care units; Mortality; Renal replacement therapy

View this abstract indexed in MEDLINE: