© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
MEDICAL PRACTICE CME
Frailty and sarcopenia—from theory to practice
James KH Luk, FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine)1; Daniel KY Chan, MD, FRACP2,3
1 Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Fung Yiu King Hospital, Hong Kong
2 Aged Care & Rehab, Bankstown Hospital, Bankstown, Australia
3 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
Corresponding author: Dr James KH Luk (lukkh@ha.org.hk)
Abstract
Frailty and sarcopenia have emerged as important
syndromes in geriatrics. Their impact is far reaching
and are associated with many poor outcomes in
older adults. Assessment of frailty and sarcopenia
should form part of the assessment in older adults
at all encounters between healthcare staff and
older adults, coupled with comprehensive geriatric
assessment. Early interventions are warranted based
on existing consensus guideline recommendations.
Recently, strict lockdown measures to protect
at-risk groups during the coronavirus disease 2019
pandemic may have led to worsening of frailty and
sarcopenia among older adults, owing to social
isolation, reduced access to care, and physical inactivity. Assessment and prevention of frailty
and sarcopenia are of particular importance during
pandemics. Further study is warranted to find the
best strategies for managing frailty and sarcopenia.
Introduction
In recent years, frailty and sarcopenia have emerged
as important syndromes in geriatrics. The aim of
this article is to give a concise overview of these
two syndromes and their evolving applications in
clinical practice. Frailty and sarcopenia are closely
connected, and there is a recent conceptualisation
of merging the two conditions into a single clinical
entity—physical frailty and sarcopenia syndrome.1
For clarity, frailty and sarcopenia will be discussed
separately in the present article.
Frailty
Definition
Frailty is “a biological syndrome of decreased reserve
and resistance to stressors, resulting from cumulative
decline across multiple physiologic systems, and
causing vulnerability to adverse outcomes”.2 The
prevalence of frailty varies depending on the
definitions. In Hong Kong, in patients aged ≥65 years,
the prevalence is reported as 7.9% for frailty and
50.6% for pre-frailty.3 Frailty is more prevalent
among women, poor socio-economic groups, and
ethnic minorities.4 Frailty-related adverse outcomes
include falls, decreased mobility, decreased
functioning, increased dependency, hospitalisation,
institutionalisation, increased healthcare expenses,
and even death.5 Frailty is a poor prognostic factor
for older patients with coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19).6
Ageing, sarcopenia, falls, polypharmacy,
cognitive impairment, co-morbidities, endocrine
disorders, poor oral health, malnutrition, cognitive
frailty, social isolation, and poverty have been
described as risk factors for frailty.7 Since 2020, COVID-19 has been implicated as a new risk factor
for frailty. Strict lockdown measures to protect older
adults from COVID-19 often worsen frailty as they
lead to social isolation, depression, malnutrition,
reduced access to care, and physical inactivity.8
Frailty assessment
Detection of frailty helps to predict individual
outcomes of interventions and facilitates better
judgement for appropriate management and resource
allocation.9 At present, there is no robust evidence
to support routine screening in the community.10
Nevertheless, many professional bodies, including
The British Geriatrics Society11 and the Asia-Pacific
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management
of frailty,12 recommend assessment for frailty in
all encounters between healthcare staff and older
adults.11
Among the many frailty assessment
instruments, no single tool can suit all situations. The
Timed Up and Go test is an example of a single-item
assessment tool.13 Commonly used non–single-item
tools include the Fried frailty phenotype, the frailty
index, the FRAIL (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation,
Illness, and Loss of weight) scale, and the Clinical
Frailty Scale.14 The choice of tool should be based
on the population characteristics and the purpose
of the assessment. For example, in primary care and
specialist out-patient settings, the Timed Up and Go
test or the Clinical Frailty Scale are suitable tools
for assessing frailty as they are quick and simple
to perform.15 More robust tools, such as the frailty
index, may be necessary for assessment before
surgery. Because the risk factors are multifactorial,
a comprehensive geriatric assessment should be
coupled with frailty assessment to identify stressors and drivers. In the United Kingdom, an electronic
version of the frailty index has been developed,
based on primary care data, including disease state,
symptoms and signs, disabilities, and abnormal
laboratory values.16
Clinical application of frailty assessment
Frailty assessment has been used in many clinical
settings. In acute settings including acute and
emergency, frailty assessment can facilitate
treatment plan formulation, triage for hospitalisation
or community support services.17 In Hong Kong, the
Geriatrics at Front Door programme was initiated
by the Hospital Authority in October 2020. In this
programme, geriatric evaluation and management
nurses provide comprehensive geriatric assessment,
including frailty assessment, for older patients in
acute and emergency departments.18 If the patients
are deemed suitable to be discharged directly after
being seen by doctors, the geriatric evaluation
and management nurses also arrange subsequent
community support and provide telephone follow-up
appointments for the patients.
In critical care, for patients aged ≥65 years,
frailty is a strong prognostic factor for death among
patients with COVID-19.19 In emergency settings,
frailty assessment can help to predict the clinical
risk of in-hospital death for patients with COVID-19
aged ≥80 years.20
Frailty assessment can facilitate personalised
treatment for patients with chronic diseases. For
example, treatment targets of diabetes can be
based on the degree of frailty in older patients.21
Assessment of frailty also allows identification of
older patients in need of end-of-life care.22 Frailty
predicts poorer surgical outcomes including
surgical complications, length of hospitalisation
and mortality. Frailty assessment before surgery
improves risk stratification and prediction of
surgical outcomes. Frailty assessment enhances
early interventions, including medication review,
nutritional augmentation, and rehabilitation.23
Frailty assessment also ensures that, after surgery,
frail patients can be given targeted care to reduce the
occurrence of pressure sore, delirium, dehydration,
and immobility.
Management of frailty
Current evidence of the efficacy of the various
interventions available is limited. Without firm
evidence-based interventions, strategies to manage
frailty are based on existing consensus guideline
recommendations. For example, the Asia-Pacific
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management
of frailty12 recommends identification of frailty, an
individualised physical programme with resistance
training. Polypharmacy should also be addressed, as
much research has linked frailty development with polypharmacy. This includes reviewing medications
regularly and deprescribing those drugs which are no
longer needed under the supervision of a healthcare
professional.24 The guideline also suggests screening
patients for causes of fatigue, reviewing patients’
nutritional status, and prescribing vitamin D for
patients who are deficient.12
In addition to hospital-based assessment and
interventions, prevention or reversal of frailty is
also shifted to the community setting.25 Individual
home-based exercise and nutrition intervention are
advocated to help pre-frail or frail older adults to
improve frailty score and physical performance.26
At every stage, it is crucial to encourage the
patient to participate in the care plan (if they are
able to). Patients may perceive “frailty” as a negative
term and many feel that once they become frail
there is no potential to improve. Educating patients
is essential, so they understand that frailty is often
remediable, especially in its early stages. In mild to
moderate stages, community rehabilitation can be
helpful. In severe stages, once the comprehensive
geriatric assessment clearly indicates that there are
no remediable factors, the focus may shift to best
supportive care and end-of-life care.27
Sarcopenia
Definition
Sarcopenia is defined as a syndrome characterised by
progressive and generalised loss of skeletal muscle
mass, strength, and function, with a risk of adverse
outcomes such as physical disability, poor quality
of life, and high mortality.28 Sarcopenia can be
categorised as acute (ie, appearing within 6 months
in the setting of an acute disease or immobility
such as hospitalisation) or chronic (ie, a chronic
sarcopenic state lasting ≥6 months).28 In Hong Kong,
the prevalence of sarcopenia is reported to be 9%
among those aged ≥65 years.29
Sarcopenia is caused by an imbalance between
muscle protein anabolism and catabolism, leading to an overall loss of skeletal muscle.30 Sarcopenia is
associated with transition of type II muscle fibres
to type I muscle fibres, and increased myosteatosis
(intramuscular and intermuscular fat infiltration).
Risk factors for sarcopenia include older age, lack
of exercise, malnutrition, hormonal imbalance,
cytokine disturbances coupled with inflammation,
and genetic predisposition.31
Sarcopenia is categorised as primary and/or
secondary based on aetiology.32 Ageing contributes
predominantly to primary sarcopenia. Secondary
sarcopenia is caused by inactivity, malnutrition, and
diseases such as advanced organ failure. Sarcopenia
can undergo dynamic changes in which improvement
or decline can occur with time.33
Screening for sarcopenia
The case-finding approach is the recommended
screening method for sarcopenia.34 Older patients
with multiple co-morbidities (such as falls,
weakness, decreased mobility and walking speed,
difficulty rising from a chair, weight loss, decreased
independence, and admission to a hospital or
institution) should be assessed for sarcopenia and
frailty. The five-times chair stand test is a simple
tool that can be used for sarcopenia screening. The
Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia recommends
a cut-off of ≥12 s to stand up from sitting on a
chair and sit down again 5 times as an indicator of
sarcopenia.34 The SARC-F (strength, assistance with
walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and
falls) is a surrogate assessment tool, with a total score
of ≥4 suggestive of sarcopenia.35 A person may also
be considered as “probable sarcopenia” if SARC-F
is positive and handgrip strength is low (Asian
Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria: <28 kg for
men, <18 kg for women).36 To confirm sarcopenia,
further investigations such as dual-energy X-ray
absorptiometry or bioelectrical impedance analysis
may be needed to quantify the muscle mass and/or 6-m walk <1.0 m/s may be needed to assess
performance. In clinical practice, the establishment
of probable sarcopenia is usually adequate to trigger
an assessment of causes and to start intervention.33
Sarcopenic obesity, sarcopenic dysphagia and
osteosarcopenia
Sarcopenic obesity is the co-presence of sarcopenia
and obesity and may produce a double metabolic
burden, resulting in higher cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality than either condition
alone.37 Dysphagia can be caused by sarcopenia
of swallowing-related muscles.38 The treatment
of sarcopenic dysphagia requires resistance
training of the swallowing muscles and nutritional
intervention.38 Patients with osteosarcopenia have a
higher chance of falls and fractures than those with
either osteoporosis or sarcopenia alone.39
Management of sarcopenia
For sarcopenia, the notion of “use it or lose it” applies. Management of sarcopenia typically
involves resistance training coupled with nutrition
supplementation, particularly protein. The
recommended daily protein intake is 1 to 1.2 g/kg
body weight, with 20 to 25 g of high-quality protein
at each meal. Beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutyrate
seems to be able to preserve or increase lean
muscle mass and muscle strength in sarcopenic
older adults.40 Supplementation with leucine-enriched
essential amino acids can improve physical
function.41 Deficiencies in vitamin D are linked with
reduced physical functioning, frailty development,
as well as falls and mortality.42 Supplementation with
800 to 1000 IU vitamin D daily improves strength
and balance in older adults.43 Many new therapies
for sarcopenia are in research and development.
Selective androgen receptor modulators are of
particular interest because of tissue selectivity.44 It
is hoped that androgen signalling with these agents
can achieve gains in skeletal muscle and strength
without dose-limiting adverse effects.
Summary
Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with many poor outcomes in older adults. Assessment of frailty and
sarcopenia should form part of the comprehensive
geriatric assessment. Early interventions are
warranted and more research is needed to find
the optimal management options for frailty and
sarcopenia.
Author contributions
Both authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision for important intellectual content.
Conflicts of interest
As an editor and an adviser of the journal, respectively, JKH Luk and DKY Chan were not involved in the peer review
process.
Funding/support
This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
1. Marzetti E, Calvani R, Cesari M, et al. Operationalization
of the physical frailty & sarcopenia syndrome: rationale and
clinical implementation. Transl Med UniSa 2016;13:29-32.
2. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older
adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci
Med Sci 2001;56:M146-56. Crossref
3. Lee JS, Auyeung TW, Leung J, Kwok T, Woo J. Transitions
in frailty states among community-living older adults and
their associated factors. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15:281-6. Crossref
4. Rohrmann S. Epidemiology of frailty in older people. Adv Exp Med Biol 2020;1216:21-7. Crossref
5. Pel-Littel RE, Schuurmans MJ, Emmelot-Vonk MH,
Verhaar HJ. Frailty: defining and measuring of a concept. J
Nutr Health Ageing. 2009;13:390-4. Crossref
6. De Smet R, Mellaerts B, Vandewinckele H, et al. Frailty
and mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19:
retrospective observational study. J Am Med Dir Assoc
2020;21:928-32.e1. Crossref
7. Artaza-Artabe I, Sáez-López P, Sánchez-Hernández N,
Fernández-Gutierrez N, Malafarina V. The relationship
between nutrition and frailty: effects of protein intake,
nutritional supplementation, vitamin D and exercise on
muscle metabolism in the elderly. A systematic review.
Maturitas 2016;93:89-99. Crossref
8. Steinman MA, Perry L, Perissinotto CM. Meeting the
care needs of older adults isolated at home during the
COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:819-20. Crossref
9. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, et al. Frailty consensus: a
call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:392-7. Crossref
10. Ambagtsheer RC, Beilby JJ, Visvanathan R, Dent E, Yu S,
Braunack-Mayer AJ. Should we screen for frailty in primary
care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence
base: A narrative review. Prev Med 2019;119:63-9. Crossref
11. Turner G, Clegg A, British Geriatrics Society; Age UK;
Royal College of General Practitioners. Best practice
guidelines for the management of frailty: a British
Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General
Practitioners report. Age Ageing 2014;43:744-7. Crossref
12. Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS, et al. The Asia-Pacific Clinical
Practice Guidelines for the management of frailty. J Am
Med Dir Assoc 2017;18:564-75. Crossref
13. Savva GM, Donoghue OA, Horgan F, Coronin H, Kenny RA.
Using time up-and-go to identify frail members of the older
population. J Gerontol A Bio Sci Med Sci 2013;68:441-6. Crossref
14. Chan DK. Chan’s Practical Geriatrics. 4th ed. Brookvale,
NSW: BA Printing Services; 2006: 96-100.
15. Rockwood K, Theou O. Using the clinical frailty scale in
allocating scarce health care resources. Can Geriatr J
2020;23:210-5.Crossref
16. Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, et al. Development and validation
of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care
electronic health record data. Age Ageing 2016;45:353-60. Crossref
17. Theou O, Campbell S, Malone ML, Rockwood K. Older
adults in the emergency department with frailty. Clin
Geriatr Med 2018;34:369-86. Crossref
18. O’Caoimh R, Costello M, Small C, et al. Comparison of
frailty screening instruments in the emergency department.
Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:3626. Crossref
19. Tehrani S, Killander A, Åstrand P, Jakobsson J, Gille-
Johnson P. Risk factors for death in adult COVID-19
patients: Frailty predicts fatal outcome in older patients.
Int J Infect Dis 2021;102:415-21. Crossref
20. Covina M, Russo A, De Matteis G et al. Frailty assessment
in the emergency department for risk stratification of
Covid-19 patients aged ≥80 years. J Am Med Dir Assoc
2021;22:1845-52. Crossref
21. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert
Committee, Meneilly GS, Knip A, et al. Diabetes in older
people. Can J Diabetes 2018;42:S283-95. Crossref
22. Stow D, Matthews FE, Hanratty B. Frailty trajectories to
identify end of life: a longitudinal population-based study.
BMC Med 2018;16:171. Crossref
23. McIsaac DI, MacDonald DB, Aucoin SD. Frailty for perioperative clinicians: a narrative review. Anesth Analg 2020;130:1450-60.Crossref
24. Rolland Y, Morley JE. Editorial: frailty and polypharmacy. J
Nutr Health Aging 2016;20:645-6. Crossref
25. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G,
Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and
public health. Lancet 2019;394:1365-75. Crossref
26. Hsien TJ, Su SC, Chen CW et al. Individualized home-based
exercise and nutrition interventions improve frailty
in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav
Nutr Phys Act 2019;16:119. Crossref
27. Baronner A, Mackenzie A. Using geriatric assessment strategies to lead end of life care discussions. Curr Oncol Rep 2017;19:75. Crossref
28. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised
European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age
Ageing 2019;48:16-31. Crossref
29. Yu R, Wong M, Leung J, Lee J, Auyeung TW, Woo J.
Incidence, reversibility, risk factors and the protective
effect of high body mass index against sarcopenia in
community-dwelling older Chinese adults. Geriatr
Gerontol Int 2014;14 Suppl 1:15-28. Crossref
30. Dhillon RJ, Hasni S. Pathogenesis and management of sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med 2017;33:17-26. Crossref
31. Marzetti E, Calvani R, Tosato M, et al. Sarcopenia: an overview. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017;29:11-7. Crossref
32. Bauer J, Morley JE, Schols AM, et al. Sarcopenia: a time for
action. An SCWD position paper. J Cachexia Sarcopenia
Muscle 2019;10:956-61. Crossref
33. Woo J. Sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med 2017;33:305-14. Crossref
34. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian Working Group
for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia
diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020;21:300-7.e2. Crossref
35. Lim JY, Low NA, Merchant RA. Prevalence of sarcopenia
in pre-frail community dwelling older adult and utility
of SARC-F, SARC-CalF and calf circumference in case
finding. J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls 2020;5:53-6. Crossref
36. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet
2019;393:2636-46. Crossref
37. Zamboni M, Rubele S, Rossi AP. Sarcopenia and obesity. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2019;22:13-9. Crossref
38. Fujishima I, Fujiu-Kurachi M, Arai H, et al. Sarcopenia
and dysphagia: Position paper by four professional
organizations. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019;19:91-7. Crossref
39. Kirk B, Zanker J, Duque G. Osteosarcopenia: epidemiology,
diagnosis, and treatment-facts and numbers. J Cachexia
Sarcopenia Muscle 2020;11:609-18. Crossref
40. Cruz-Jentoft AJ. Beta-Hydroxy-Beta-Methyl Butyrate
(HMB): from experimental data to clinical evidence in
sarcopenia. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2018;19:668-72. Crossref
41. Schneider DA, Trence DL. Possible role of nutrition
in prevention of sarcopenia and falls. Endocr Pract
2019;25:1184-90. Crossref
42. Luk JK, Chan TY, Chan DK. Fall prevention in the elderly:
translating evidence into practice. Hong Kong Med J
2015;21:165-71. Crossref
43. Abiri B, Vafa M. Vitamin D and muscle sarcopenia in
ageing. Methods Mol Biol 2020;2138:29-47. Crossref
44. Solomon ZJ, Mirabal JR, Mazur DJ, Kohn TP, Lipshultz LI,
Pastuszak AW. Selective androgen receptor modulators:
current knowledge and clinical applications. Sex Med Rev
2019;7:84-94. Crossref