Hong Kong Med J 2021 Feb;27(1):64–6 | Epub 2 Feb 2021
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
COMMENTARY
Community continuous positive airway pressure
therapy and non-invasive ventilation use during
the COVID-19 pandemic
KY Chiang, FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine); Mary SM Ip, FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine); Macy MS Lui, FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine)
Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Corresponding author: Dr Mact MS Lui (macymslui@gmail.com)
Enhancement in healthcare and medical management
has extended the life expectancy of many chronic
medical conditions. Community non-invasive
ventilation (NIV) becomes a life-sustaining support
for patients with severe ventilation insufficiency,
as a complication of chronic respiratory or other
systemic disorders.1 Other than chronic respiratory
failure, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and obesity
hypoventilation syndrome constitute important
indications of community use of continuous
positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy or NIV.
An estimate of 5.3% middle-aged adults in Hong
Kong have moderate to severe OSA that warrants
CPAP therapy.2 Although untreated OSA is rarely
life-threatening in short term,3 lacking appropriate
treatment is associated with poor physical and mental
health, cognitive performance, increased incidence
of driving-related accidents and hypertension. The
return of snoring may disturb family members’
sleep, and adversely impact household temperament
which may already be tense under home confinement
measure.
With the recent coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) pandemic, it brings up the question
of potential household contamination related to
use of NIV or CPAP by patients carrying the virus.
The matter is of concern especially when significant
community outbreak occurs in densely populated
cities like Hong Kong, where people cohabit in
modestly sized studios or apartments. Evidence
suggesting household transmission directly related
to NIV/CPAP use in community is not available,
and the risk remains hypothetical.4 Despite so,
physicians should discuss with patients on benefits
of continuing its use, balancing against risks of
discontinuation, and the essential precautions
and sanitisation procedures under this pandemic
situation.
It will be sensible to advise patients with active
symptoms suggestive of respiratory tract infection
to suspend the use of CPAP for OSA temporarily
for a few weeks, and to seek medical attention. In
fact, many of them may tolerate PAP poorly in
the presence of stuffy nose and sore throat. They
should be educated to seek medical attention and workup for possible infection, with consideration
of hospitalisation with or without NIV support
in isolation facilities. However, withdrawal from
community NIV or PAP cannot be recommended
in many situations in the absence of symptoms
suggestive of infection, especially when home NIV
is considered life-preserving, or when it is essential
in preventing hospital admissions at the time when
healthcare resources are already stressed towards
managing COVID-19 patients. It is also undesirable
or risky to stop CPAP in patients with OSA working
in safety critical jobs or those with increased
workload during the pandemic.
When continuation of home NIV or CPAP
is warranted, specific measures can be considered
to minimise the theoretical risk of household
contamination. The interface design and sealing
property can have a major impact on the possibility
of environmental contamination. In an experimental
study using a simulator model, substantial exhaled
air exposure occurred within 1-metre distance of
mask exhalation port, when bi-level ventilation with
inspiratory PAP at 18 cm H2O was delivered via two
types of oronasal masks.5 Similar experiment was
repeated recently and it was intriguing to find that
when a newer oronasal mask with circular diffuse
venting and secure facial seal material was used,
leakage and exhaled air dispersion became minimal.6
When CPAP at 20 cm H2O was delivered via two
brands of nasal pillows, exhaled air dispersed to
26 cm to 33 cm only.6 From these bench data, exhaled
air dispersion on NIV or CPAP can be mitigated
by assuring proper mask-face fitting, minimising
leakage and adopting specific venting configuration.
In fact, with a good facial seal and strategic venting
configuration, the interface covering nose and
mouth may act as a physical barrier against exhaled
air dispersion, which occurs even on normal tidal
breathing.7
From our experience, unintended mouth
leakage associated with use of nasal mask can be
minimised by the addition of chin strap. Patients
should be advised to seek medical attention when
need of switching interface arises. Renewal of
interface at interval is also worthwhile, as the sealing material tends to age and degrade upon repeated
usage and cleaning procedure. Other than optimising
interface fitting, loose connection should be timely
addressed as it may be the source of significant air
leakage or contamination. Since higher inspiratory
pressures increase dispersion distance of droplets,
the lowest effective pressure to control respiratory
events should be adopted.8
In high-risk setting with evident viral
transmission in the community, a well-fitted non-vented
oro-nasal mask connected to a viral filter and
an exhalation port in a single-limb NIV/CPAP circuit
may be considered, which is similar to current NIV
use in hospital settings. The exhaled air is filtered by
high-performance viral filter and contamination of
surroundings is avoided. The NIV or CPAP devices
need to equip with software compatible with change
in resistance in the circuit. It may be advisable to
avoid humidifiers especially in the absence of heated
tubing or when viral filter is in place, in order to
avoid risk of environmental or device soiling from
the condensate.
Other than CPAP and NIV modifications,
several environmental adjustments can be exercised
to optimise infection control. Aerosolised severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can
remain viable in air for 1 hour,9 and a well-ventilated
room with opened window/doors and plenty of air
exchange will help prevent airborne infection.10
Both patients and family members should pay
extra attention to hand hygiene, masking and social
distancing measures to avoid contracting the virus
and cluster infection.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 virus was found viable up to 72 hours
on plastic surfaces9 and therefore cleaning of the
CPAP machine and its accessories (masks or nasal
pillow, headgear, tubing and sponge filter) should be
performed regularly. Recommendations are available
and daily cleaning of the mask interface with soapy
water or cleaning wipes is advisable. Tubing can be
cleaned by sterilising solution (eg, vinegar diluted
with water, sodium hypochlorite solution of 0.1% or
1000 ppm) every other days.11
Currently, devices using ozone gas and
ultraviolet (UV) light for disinfection are available
in the market. However, United States Food and
Drug Administration has not authorised its use on
CPAP devices and accessories.12 There is a risk that
an elevated ozone gas concentration can remain
in the machine and tubing which may irritate the
respiratory tract. The UV light cleaning can be
hazardous to users if there is inadequate shielding.
Moreover, there is significant difference on the
intensity and duration of UV light exposure among
different marketed machines with questionable
disinfection efficacy, which may provide a false sense
of security to the patients.
Data on community NIV and CPAP use
during COVID-19 pandemic are still lacking.
There are many possible modes of viral spread in a
confined habitat other than utilisation of ventilation
devices, and their relative significance in household
transmission should be investigated. In our opinion,
physicians should educate and remind their patients
on proper care of the device, cleaning procedures
and other measures to minimise the risks of
community infection transmission. Given the local
situation is under control at the time being, patients
deriving clear health benefits from the NIV/CPAP
should continue the treatment with vigilance on
infection control measures. Prospectively, research
works investigating on improved device design and
infection control strategies related to NIV use are
highly desirable.
Author contributions
Concept or design: All authors.
Acquisition of data: KY Chiang and MMS Lui.
Analysis or interpretation of data: KY Chiang and MMS Lui.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Acquisition of data: KY Chiang and MMS Lui.
Analysis or interpretation of data: KY Chiang and MMS Lui.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take
responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Funding/support
This commentary received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
1. Chu CM, Piper A. Non-invasive ventilation: A glimpse into the future. Respirology 2019;24:1140-2. Crossref
2. Benjafield AV, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep
apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med
2019;7:687-98. Crossref
3. Chiang KY, Ma TS, Ip MS, Lui MM. Respiratory
arrest requiring resuscitation as a rare presentation of
obstructive sleep apnoea and hypothyroidism. BMJ Case
Rep 2019;12:e230163. Crossref
4. Baker JG, Sovani M. Case for continuing community NIV and CPAP during the COVID-19 epidemic. Thorax
2020;75:368. Crossref
5. Hui DS, Chow BK, Ng SS, et al. Exhaled air dispersion distances during noninvasive ventilation via different
Respironics face masks. Chest 2009;136:998-1005. Crossref
6. Hui DS, Chow BK, Lo T, et al. Exhaled air dispersion during high-flow nasal cannula therapy versus CPAP via different
masks. Eur Respir J 2019;53:1802339. Crossref
7. Olmedo I, Nielsen PV, Ruiz de Adana M, Jensen RL, Grzelecki P. Distribution of exhaled contaminants and
personal exposure in a room using three different air distribution strategies. Indoor Air 2012;22:64-76. Crossref
8. Esquinas AM, Egbert Pravinkumar S, Scala R, et al. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in high-risk
pulmonary infections: a clinical review. Eur Respir Rev
2014;23:427-38. Crossref
9. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with
SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1564-7. Crossref
10. Atkinson J, Chartier Y, Pessoa-Silva CL, Jensen P, Li Y, Seto WH, editors. Natural ventilation for infection control
in health-care settings. World Health Organization; 2009.
Available from: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/natural_ventilation.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2021.
11. Coronavirus FAQs: CPAP tips for sleep apnea patients,
American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Available from: https://aasm.org/coronavirus-covid-19-faqs-cpap-sleep-apnea-patients/ Accessed 22 Jan 2021.
12. US Food and Drug Administration. Potential risks
associated with the use of ozone and ultraviolet (UV) light
products for cleaning CPAP machines and accessories:
FDA safety communication. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/potential-risks-associated-use-ozone-and-ultraviolet-uv-light-products-cleaning-cpap-machines-and. Accessed 23 Apr 2020.