Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a key cause of liver diseases associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that in 2019, 296 million people had chronic HBV infections and there were approximately 820 000 HBV-related deaths, mostly due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.1 2 The estimated global prevalence of HBV infection in 2019 was 3.8%.1 2 To eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030, the WHO has outlined a set of global impact and service coverage targets, including a prevalence of ≤0.1% for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) among children 5 years of age; this target will help eliminate mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HBV.3 4

Prevention is the main strategy for HBV elimination because there is currently no complete cure for HBV. In high endemic regions, MTCT, also referred to as vertical transmission, remains the primary route of HBV transmission; the risk of chronicity after HBV infection is 90% in the perinatal period, compared with 5% in adulthood.5 Hepatitis B virus can also be spread through horizontal transmission, especially during early childhood. Pregnancy offers an ideal occasion to eliminate HBV through proper screening and timely treatment for asymptomatic HBV-infected mothers and their infants. Universal timely neonatal hepatitis B vaccination is the most important intervention for reducing MTCT of HBV. The administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) for infants born to HBV-infected mothers, as well as maternal peripartum prophylaxis with antivirals, would provide additional protection against MTCT of HBV.

In these guidelines, we focus on the management of HBV-infected pregnant women for reduction of MTCT risk, which is a core strategy in the Hong Kong Viral Hepatitis Action Plan 2020-2024.6

Neonatal hepatitis B vaccination remains the most effective measure for prevention of MTCT; it can reduce the rate of MTCT from 90% to 21% in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–positive women and from 30% to 2.6% in HBeAg-negative women.7 The addition of a birth dose of HBIG can further reduce the risk to 6% in HBeAg-positive women and 1% in HBeAg-negative women.7 A delayed birth dose of hepatitis B vaccination and failed administration of HBIG at birth have been associated with immunoprophylaxis failure (IF) [see below].8

In Hong Kong, infants born to HBV-infected mothers have received hepatitis B vaccination and HBIG since 1984. Neonatal vaccination was extended to all infants, regardless of their mothers’ HBV infection status, in 1988. The implementation of a universal childhood hepatitis B vaccination programme has led to a continuous reduction in HBV prevalence in Hong Kong, achieving coverage rates of >99% for the birth dose, as well as the second and third doses of vaccine.9 Thus, HBsAg prevalence among the antenatal population in Hong Kong gradually decreased from 10.8% in 1992 to 2.5% in 2022.10

The WHO recommends the followings11 12 13:

All pregnant women should undergo HBsAg testing at least once, as early in their pregnancy as possible.

All infants should receive their first dose of hepatitis B vaccine as soon as possible after birth, preferably within 24 hours after delivery.

The birth dose should be followed by two or three doses to complete the primary vaccination series.

The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (HKCOG) recommends the followings:

All pregnant women should undergo HBsAg screening in early pregnancy.

All infants should receive the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine as soon as possible (within 24 hours after delivery), followed by the second and third doses at 1 month and 6 months of age, respectively.

Infants born to HBV-infected mothers should receive the birth dose of HBIG when they receive the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine.

Among infants who undergo active and passive immunisation for hepatitis B, some do not develop adequate antibodies. Immunoprophylaxis failure is defined as persistent HBsAg seropositivity in infants when tested at the ages of 9 to 12 months, or 1 to 2 months after completion of the vaccination series.14 The reported rates of IF range from 1% to 9% in the literature.15 In Hong Kong, a single-centre study revealed an IF rate of 2.5% (3/121) in 2001.16 Another prospective study involving five maternity units in Hong Kong showed that the IF rate was 1.1% (7/641) between 2014 and 2016.17

The possible mechanisms of IF are outlined in Figure 1.18 Germline infection is a possibility because HBV DNA has been detected in sperm and ova of people with HBV infection, as well as embryos from male HBsAg-positive/female HBsAg-negative couples or male HBsAg-negative/female HBsAg-positive couples.19 20 21 Transplacental infection is another possible mechanism of IF. The gradual decreases in the detection rates of HBV markers and layers of affected placental cells from the maternal side to the fetal side support the hypothesis that progressive HBV placental infection could lead to in utero infection.22 23 Additionally, invasive prenatal tests can cause HBV inoculation from maternal blood, especially in HBsAg-positive pregnant women with a high viral load. A retrospective cohort study showed that the risk of IF after amniocentesis was higher in women with an HBV DNA level of ≥7 log₁₀IU/mL than in women with an HBV DNA level of <7 log₁₀IU/mL (10.8% vs 0%; P=0.004).24 During vaginal delivery, contact with vaginal secretions harbouring HBV may also increase the risk of vertical transmission. Thus, a delay in vaccination to infants at birth increases the risk of IF.

The risk of IF mainly depends on the degree of viral replication, any invasive prenatal procedures, and the availability and timing of the birth dose vaccine and HBIG. Immunoprophylaxis failure is strongly correlated with the viral load (ie, DNA level) in maternal blood during the antenatal and perinatal periods.21 25 Although non-infectious HBeAg is produced during viral replication, it is associated with high HBV DNA levels. Thus, both maternal HBeAg-positive status and a high maternal HBV DNA level are risk factors for IF.17 26 27 In a multicentre study involving 641 women and 654 infants in Hong Kong, all seven cases of IF were born to HBeAg-positive mothers with an HBV DNA level of >7.2 log₁₀IU/mL.17 To reduce the maternal viral load and the risk of IF, maternal use of antivirals as peripartum prophylaxis should be considered.

Immunoprophylaxis failure occurs in infants of highly viraemic mothers despite timely birth doses of hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG. Similar to human immunodeficiency virus and herpes simplex virus, antenatal antiviral treatment can suppress the viral load and reduce the risk of MTCT.28 29

A randomised controlled trial involving 200 HBsAg-positive pregnant women showed that daily oral intake of 300-mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from 30 to 32 weeks of gestation could significantly lower maternal HBV DNA at delivery and thus reduce the rates of IF (intention-to-treat analysis: 5% vs 18%, P=0.007; per-protocol analysis: 0% vs 7%, P=0.01).30 Although a subsequent multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial involving 331 women did not show any significant difference in the rate of IF between women receiving TDF and placebo beginning at 28 weeks of gestation (0 vs 2%; P=0.12), the zero MTCT rate in the TDF group confirmed the efficacy of TDF intake.31 The inclusion of women with lower viral loads and the timely administration of hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG (median time: approximately 1.3 hours after birth) might explain the comparable IF rates between the TDF and placebo groups.32

In a meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratios derived from randomised controlled trials of the efficacy of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis for reducing MTCT risk were 0.10 for TDF (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.03-0.35), 0.16 for lamivudine (95% CI=0.10-0.29), and 0.14 for telbivudine (95% CI=0.09-0.21).33 Although these three antivirals are highly effective in preventing MTCT and can be safely used during pregnancy without maternal or infant safety concerns, TDF is recommended because it has a high threshold for drug resistance.11 33 34

According to the WHO, pregnant women who test positive for HBV infection (ie, HBsAg-positive) and have an HBV DNA level of ≥5.3 log₁₀U/mL (≥200 000 IU/mL) should receive TDF prophylaxis from the 28th week of pregnancy until birth or later to prevent MTCT of HBV. This prophylaxis should be provided along with the three-dose hepatitis B vaccination for infants, including a timely birth dose.11 This recommendation is consistent with clinical guidelines from other international bodies including the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD),35 the European Association for the Study of the Liver,36 and the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (Table).37 Some experts have also suggested initiation of TDF early in the second trimester for individuals with a high risk of preterm birth or an HBV DNA level of ≥8 log₁₀IU/mL (≥100 000 000 IU/mL).15

To further reduce the risk of MTCT of HBV, since August 2020, all birthing hospitals under the Hospital Authority have been referring HBV-infected pregnant women with a high HBV viral load (ie, an HBV DNA level of >200 000 IU/mL) to hepatology clinics and hepatitis nurse clinics for assessment and consideration of initiating antiviral prophylaxis by the third trimester. Other HBV-infected pregnant women are also referred to the appropriate level of care for routine HBV management.

The HKCOG recommends the followings (Fig 2):

Hepatitis B virus–infected pregnant women should undergo assessments of HBV DNA level, HBeAg status, and baseline liver function in early pregnancy to determine the need for antiviral prophylaxis to prevent MTCT of HBV and the need for antiviral treatment to manage maternal indications.38 39 40

There is no need for repeat HBV DNA quantification in later stages of pregnancy. Hepatitis B virus DNA levels typically remain stable during pregnancy and similar cut-offs could be used to predict the risk of IF.40

For women with an HBV DNA level of >5.3 log₁₀IU/mL (>200 000 IU/mL), multidisciplinary care involving hepatologists is advised to discuss the indications and safety of antenatal TDF to reduce the risk of IF.11

For women with an HBV DNA level of ≤5.3 log₁₀IU/mL (≤200 000 IU/mL), reminders should be established for long-term regular monitoring and follow-up after delivery, in accordance with established protocols for patients with chronic HBV infection.34 41

There is conflicting evidence regarding the associations of HBV infection with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The results of some studies have suggested an increased risk of gestational diabetes and preterm birth,42 43 44 45 46 47 whereas the results of other studies have not supported this association.48 49 50 More data are needed to evaluate the impacts of viral load on pregnancy complications, but the available evidence does not warrant additional antenatal surveillance. Although there is a theoretical risk of intrauterine HBV exposure after chorionic villus sampling, fetal scalp blood sampling, and the use of fetal scalp electrodes, data concerning the risk of vertical transmission after these procedures are scarce. The effects of viral load on these procedures are also unknown, but the risk of vertical transmission is likely to be smaller in women with a lower viral load. Women should be counselled about this limited evidence, and these procedures generally should be avoided. For amniocentesis, the risk of IF is low when the viral load is <7 log₁₀IU/mL. In one study, transplacental amniocentesis did not increase the rate of IF, but this finding was based on a small number of cases.51 A reasonable approach comprises implementing transamniotic amniocentesis while avoiding transplacental puncture. Caesarean delivery should not be offered solely to prevent MTCT of HBV, and the mode of delivery should be based on obstetric indications.

Breastfeeding is not contraindicated for mothers who continue to receive TDF. Although a low level of TDF can be detected in breast milk, there is no evidence that this low level leads to adverse outcomes.35 Infants should receive a routine three-dose course of hepatitis B vaccination at birth, 1 month of age, and 6 months of age.

The WHO emphasises the need for postvaccination serological testing (PVST) of infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers.12 This testing includes testing of antibodies to HBsAg, as well as HBsAg itself, at 9 to 12 months of age (or 1 to 2 months after the final dose of the vaccine series, if the series is delayed).14 It allows vaccine non-responders to receive a booster dose of vaccine to reduce the risk of horizontal transmission. Additionally, infants with IF should be monitored by healthcare professionals to identify liver conditions and potential complications (eg, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma).52 Finally, it can provide valuable information concerning the effectiveness of MTCT prevention strategies.

The Department of Health and the Hospital Authority established a collaboration to provide a PVST service, initiated in January 2022, for infants born to HBV-infected mothers in April 2021 or later; covered infants must attend the Maternal and Child Health Centres of the Department of Health. Beginning in June 2022, mop-up PVST was arranged for infants born in or after October 2020; testing completion was required before the age of 24 months. Blood collection for PVST is conducted in Hong Kong Children’s Hospital at 9 to 12 months of age, and up to the age of 24 months (or 1 to 2 months after the final dose of hepatitis B vaccine), to identify HBV-infected infants and infants with an inadequate immune response to the primary series of hepatitis B vaccine; these infants are eligible for re-vaccination. Hepatitis B virus–infected infants are referred to paediatric units within the Hospital Authority for management. Infants who have an inadequate or absent immune response after the second course of hepatitis B vaccine are referred to the Hong Kong Children’s Hospital for further assessment.

Lack of continuity of care has been common in Hong Kong; for example, 52.6% of HBV-infected individuals did not receive any medical care within 1 year after delivery.53 Mothers with chronic HBV infection should undergo regular monitoring of disease activity and surveillance of HBV complications, in accordance with established protocols for patients with chronic HBV infection.34 41

Among antiviral-treated pregnant women with HBV infection, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares can occur during pregnancy (10.9%), although most occur in the postpartum period (45.7%), as demonstrated by a prospective study of 303 Chinese pregnant women.54 After cessation of prophylactic antivirals, the HBV DNA level rebounded in nearly all of the women, but only 73% of the women developed ALT flares and 21% of the women required retreatment.55

In a study of 91 highly viraemic HBV-infected mothers, the incidences of postpartum flares were similar regardless of whether antivirals were stopped at 2 weeks (50%, n=22/44) or 12 weeks (40%, n=17/43) after delivery. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the timing of flare onset (8.2 vs 10.2 weeks), peak ALT level (229 U/L vs 209 U/L), proportion of severe flares (ie, ALT rise ≥20 times the upper limit of normal of 19 U/L) [14% vs 12%], and rate of spontaneous resolution of ALT flares (75% vs 53%).56 Another multicentre study showed that the rates of postpartum ALT flares were similar between women who stopped treatment at delivery (33%, n=3/9) and those who continued treatment for a longer duration (22%, n=4/18).57

Overall, there is no evidence that prolonging the duration of prophylactic antiviral treatment after delivery would reduce the rate or severity of postpartum ALT flares.

For HBV-infected pregnant women receiving antiviral prophylaxis during pregnancy solely to prevent MTCT (ie, without maternal indications), the recommended duration of antiviral therapy is not well-defined and varies among guidelines. The European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines recommend continuing prophylactic antiviral treatment until 12 weeks after delivery.36 In contrast, the AASLD guidelines recommend stopping prophylactic antiviral treatment at delivery or continuing until 12 weeks postpartum. Notably, the AASLD guidelines are the only international guidelines that emphasise close monitoring of serum ALT every 3 months for up to 6 months after delivery.35 The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines also recommend stopping prophylactic antiviral treatment at delivery or continuing until 12 weeks after delivery (Table).37

The HKCOG recommends the followings:

Multidisciplinary care is essential to ensure that women are counselled about the existing evidence and allowed to engage in thorough discussion with the treating physician regarding the risks and benefits of the timing for cessation of prophylactic treatment.

Importantly, although most flares are mild and spontaneously resolve, liver function tests should be performed every 3 months for 6 months after cessation of prophylactic antiviral treatment.35

Hepatitis B virus–infected pregnant women receiving antiviral treatment for maternal indications should continue therapy, even after delivery, and be managed in accordance with standard protocols.35 36 37 41

All authors contributed to the concept or design, acquisition of data, analysis or interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.

LLY Mak has served as an advisor for Gilead Sciences. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The guidelines were produced by the Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists as an educational aid and reference for obstetricians and gynaecologists practising in Hong Kong. These guidelines do not define a standard of care, nor are they intended to dictate an exclusive course of management. They present recognised clinical methods and techniques for practitioners to consider incorporating into their practices. It is understood that clinical management may vary and must always be responsive to the needs of individual patients, as well as the resources and limitations unique to each institution or type of practice. These guidelines also highlight areas of clinical uncertainty in which further research may be warranted.

The authors thank members of the Department of Health and the Hospital Authority for providing expert comments on the guidelines.

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

2. World Health Organization. Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. Accountability for the global health sector strategies 2016–2021: actions for impact. Web Annex 1: Key data at a glance. 2021. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/342808/9789240030985-eng.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

3. World Health Organization. Global Health Sector Strategy on viral hepatitis 2016-2021: towards ending viral hepatitis. 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246177/WHO-HIV-2016.06-eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

4. World Health Organization. Global Hepatitis Report 2017. 2017. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255016/9789241565455-eng;jsessionid=B32461CA5A37D9C9D7A90BCE32C43F92?sequence=1. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

5. Edmunds WJ, Medley GF, Nokes DJ, Hall AJ, Whittle HC. The influence of age on the development of the hepatitis B carrier state. Proc Biol Sci 1993;253:197-201. Crossref

6. Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Hong Kong Viral Hepatitis Action Plan 2020-2024. 2020. Available from: https://www.hepatitis.gov.hk/doc/action_plan/Action%20Plan_Full%20Version_PDF_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

7. Isaacs D, Kilham HA, Alexander S, Wood N, Buckmaster A, Royle J. Ethical issues in preventing mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B by immunisation. Vaccine 2011;29:6159-62. Crossref

8. Kang W, Ding Z, Shen L, et al. Risk factors associated with immunoprophylaxis failure against mother to child transmission of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis B vaccination status in Yunnan province, China. Vaccine 2014;32:3362-6. Crossref

9. Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government Surveillance of Viral Hepatitis in Hong Kong: 2021 Report. 2022. Available from: https://www.hepatitis.gov.hk/english/health_professionals/files/hepsurv21.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

10. Viral Hepatitis Control Office, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B. 2023. Available from: https://www.hepatitis.gov.hk/english/mtct/maternal_transmission_of_hepatitis_b.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

11. World Health Organization. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: guidelines on antiviral prophylaxis in pregnancy. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-000270-8. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

12. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B vaccines: WHO position paper–July 2017. 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER9227 . Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

13. World Health Organization. Guidelines on hepatitis B and C testing. 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549981. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

14. Schillie S, Murphy TV, Fenlon N, Ko S, Ward JW. Update: shortened interval for postvaccination serologic testing of infants born to hepatitis B–infected mothers. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:1118-20. Crossref

15. Terrault NA, Levy MT, Cheung KW, Jourdain G. Viral hepatitis and pregnancy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;18:117-30. Crossref

16. Tse K, Siu SL, Yip KT, et al. Immuno-prophylaxis of babies borne to hepatitis B carrier mothers. Hong Kong Med J 2006;12:368-74.

17. Cheung KW, Seto MT, Kan AS, et al. Immunoprophylaxis failure of infants born to hepatitis B carrier mothers following routine vaccination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:144-5. Crossref

18. Cheung KW, Seto MT, Wong SF. Towards complete eradication of hepatitis B infection from perinatal transmission: review of the mechanisms of in utero infection and the use of antiviral treatment during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;169:17-23. Crossref

19. Huang JM, Huang TH, Qiu HY, et al. Effects of hepatitis B virus infection on human sperm chromosomes. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:736-40. Crossref

20. Ye F, Yue Y, Li S, et al. Presence of HBsAg, HBcAg, and HBVDNA in ovary and ovum of the patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:387-92. Crossref

21. Nie R, Jin L, Zhang H, Xu B, Chen W, Zhu G. Presence of hepatitis B virus in oocytes and embryos: a risk of hepatitis B virus transmission during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1667-71. Crossref

22. Xu DZ, Yan YP, Zou S, et al. Role of placental tissues in the intrauterine transmission of hepatitis B virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:981-7. Crossref

23. Zhang SL, Yue YF, Bai GQ, Shi L, Jiang H. Mechanism of intrauterine infection of hepatitis B virus. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:437-8. Crossref

24. Han Z, Zhang Y, Bai X, Yin Y, Xu C, Hou H. Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus after amniocentesis: a retrospective matched cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2019;39:431-40. Crossref

25. Hu XL, Zhou XP, Qian YL, Wu GY, Ye YH, Zhu YM. The presence and expression of the hepatitis B virus in human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1860-7. Crossref

26. Zou H, Chen Y, Duan Z, Zhang H, Pan C. Virologic factors associated with failure to passive-active immunoprophylaxis in infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers. J Viral Hepat 2012;19:e18-25. Crossref

27. Song YM, Sung J, Yang S, Choe YH, Chang YS, Park WS. Factors associated with immunoprophylaxis failure against vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus. Eur J Pediatr 2007;166:813-8. Crossref

28. Mandelbrot L, Landreau-Mascaro A, Rekacewicz C, et al. Lamivudine-zidovudine combination for prevention of maternal-infant transmission of HIV-1. JAMA 2001;285:2083-93. Crossref

29. Foley E, Clarke E, Beckett VA, et al. Management of genital herpes in pregnancy. 2014. Available from: https:// www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/other-guidelines-and-reports/management-of-genital-herpes-in-pregnancy/. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

30. Pan CQ, Duan Z, Dai E, et al. Tenofovir to prevent hepatitis B transmission in mothers with high viral load. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2324-34. Crossref

31. Jourdain G, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Harrison L, et al. Tenofovir versus placebo to prevent perinatal transmission of hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2018;378:911-23. Crossref

32. Cheung KW, Seto MT, Ng EH. Tenofovir to prevent perinatal transmission of hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2349-50. Crossref

33. Funk AL, Lu Y, Yoshida K, et al. Efficacy and safety of antiviral prophylaxis during pregnancy to prevent mother-to- child transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:70-84. Crossref

34. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection. 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549059. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

35. Terrault NA, Lok AS, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 2018;67:1560-99. Crossref

36. European Association for the Study of the Liver; Williamson C, Nana M, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of liver diseases in pregnancy. J Hepatol 2023;79:768-828. Crossref

37. Kumar M, Abbas Z, Azami M, et al. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) guidelines: hepatitis B virus in pregnancy. Hepatol Int 2022;16:211-53. Crossref

38. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM); Dionne-Odom J, Tita AT, Silverman NS. #38: Hepatitis B in pregnancy screening, treatment, and prevention of vertical transmission. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:6-14. Crossref

39. Hui PW, Ng C, Cheung KW, Lai CL. Acceptance of antiviral treatment and enhanced service model for pregnant patients carrying hepatitis B. Hong Kong Med J 2020;26:318-22. Crossref

40. Cheung KW, Seto MT, So PL, et al. Optimal timing of hepatitis B virus DNA quantification and clinical predictors for higher viral load during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98:1301-6. Crossref

41. Hospital Authority and Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Management of adult patients with chronic hepatitis B in primary care. 2023. Available from: https://www.hepatitis.gov.hk/english/health_professionals/files/Management_of_Adult_Patients_with_CHB_in_Primary_Care_full_guidance.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

42. Liu J, Zhang S, Liu M, Wang Q, Shen H, Zhang Y. Maternal pre-pregnancy infection with hepatitis B virus and the risk of preterm birth: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e624-32. Crossref

43. Zheng S, Zhang H, Chen R, Yan J, Han Q. Pregnancy complicated with hepatitis B virus infection and preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:513. Crossref

44. Zhao Y, Chen YL, Song HQ, et al. Effects of maternal hepatitis B surface antigen positive status on the pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study in Xiamen, China, 2011-2018. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229732. Crossref

45. Ma X, Sun D, Li C, Ying J, Yan Y. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and preterm labor (birth) in pregnant women—an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2018;90:93-100. Crossref

46. Lao TT, Chan BC, Leung WC, Ho LF, Tse KY. Maternal hepatitis B infection and gestational diabetes mellitus. J Hepatol 2007;47:46-50. Crossref

47. Giles ML, Davey MA, Wallace EM. Chronic hepatitis B infection and the risk of gestational diabetes: a cross-sectional study. BJOG 2020;127:1147-52. Crossref

48. Cheung KW, Wang W, So PL, et al. Relationship between viral load and pregnancy outcomes among hepatitis B carriers. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2022;61:630-3. Crossref

49. Keramat A, Younesian M, Gholami Fesharaki M, et al. Inactive hepatitis B carrier and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health 2017;46:468-74.

50. Lao TT, Sahota DS, Cheng YK, Law LW, Leung TY. Maternal hepatitis B surface antigen status and incidence of pre-eclampsia. J Viral Hepat 2013;20:343-9. Crossref

51. Han Z, Zhang Y, Bai X, Yin Y, Xu C, Hou H. Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus after amniocentesis: a retrospective matched cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2019;39:431-40. Crossref

52. Indolfi G, Easterbrook P, Dusheiko G, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:466-76. Crossref

53. Cheung KW, Seto MT, Wong D, et al. Pattern and predictors of medical care received by hepatitis B carriers during pregnancy and after delivery. Public Health 2019;168:36-42. Crossref

54. Wang X, Song A, Lin X, et al. Clinical characteristics of hepatitis flares during pregnancy and postpartum in Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus carriers—a prospective cohort study of 417 cases. Front Immunol 2022;13:1031291. Crossref

55. Samadi Kochaksaraei G, Castillo E, Sadler MD, et al. Real-world clinical and virological outcomes in a retrospective multiethnic cohort study of 341 untreated and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate–treated chronic hepatitis B pregnant patients in North America. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020;52:1707-16. Crossref

56. Nguyen V, Tan PK, Greenup AJ, et al. Anti-viral therapy for prevention of perinatal HBV transmission: extending therapy beyond birth does not protect against post-partum flare. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014;39:1225-34. Crossref

57. Chang CY, Aziz N, Poongkunran M, et al. Serum aminotransferase flares in pregnant and postpartum women with current or prior treatment for chronic hepatitis B. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018;52:255-61. Crossref