Hong Kong Med J 2020 Jun;26(3):263–4 | Epub 5 Jun 2020
Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Workflow updates to maintain clinical services
and reduce utilisation of personal protective
equipment during the COVID-19 outbreak
Ken YT Lee, PhD1; Aggie WS Kwan, MPH1; TL Que, MB, BS, FHKAM (Pathology)2; Mandy MY Mak, MSc1
1 Department of Physiotherapy, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
2 Department of Clinical Pathology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
Corresponding author: Dr Ken YT Lee (physioken@yahoo.com.hk)
To the Editor—In a general hospital, there are many
clinical procedures involving aerosol-generating
procedures (AGPs), such as bronchoscopy and other
specific procedures involving airway care, that can
induce the production of aerosols of various sizes,
including droplet nuclei.1 According to the latest
guidelines from the Centre for Health Protection of
the Hong Kong SAR Government, the recommended
personal protective equipment (PPE) for performing
AGPs includes N95 respirator, eye protection,
gown, gloves, and cap (optional).2 However, there
was a severe and mounting disruption to the global
supply of PPE amid the outbreak of coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response, the Hospital
Authority adjusted public hospital non-emergency
services and non-essential services to focus
manpower and resources.3 Reducing utilisation of
PPE in various clinical services has become an issue
of current concern at frontline and management
levels.4 5
Physiotherapists often perform AGPs such
as open suctioning of respiratory tract (including
tracheostomy care). In the Physiotherapy
Department of Tuen Mun Hospital, the workflow
of chest physiotherapy service was reviewed and
analysed to explore the possibility of AGPs being
grouped and handled by a designated team of
physiotherapists, and the service delivery process
of chest physiotherapy was then re-designed. A
designated AGP team was established in which a
group of physiotherapists (8 in total, on rotation)
solely delivering chest physiotherapy involving
AGPs. The workload for the AGP team was
centralised and managed with extended working
hours to maximise the use of every N95 respirator.
To facilitate the implementation of the new
workflow and compliance of infection control
measures, a patient care assistant was assigned to
assist the physiotherapist in logistics and patient
preparation prior to and after the treatment, to
maximise work efficiency. Additional training was
provided to the patient care assistant to enhance
their competency in infection control measures.
The patient care assistant also helped to ensure
proper gowning procedures of the physiotherapist.
The changes in workflow were well communicated
and supported by all staff. The AGP team using the
new workflow have been observed by the consultant
microbiologist and the cluster infection control officer, and they have found that the new workflow
fulfils the updated requirements of infection control.
Since implementing the new workflow
in February 2020, consumption of PPE in the
Physiotherapy Department has decreased
substantially. The usage of N95 respirators decreased
from approximately 60 pieces to eight pieces daily
(>80% reduction), resulting in saving >1000 N95
respirators per month. Most importantly, such
administrative change of workflow neither sacrificed
the clinical service provision nor the occupational
safety in performing high-risk AGPs. In addition to
chest physiotherapy, the above measures may also
be applicable to other clinical procedures involving
AGP such as elective endotracheal intubation,
bronchoscopy, and upper airway endoscopy.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the concept of the study, acquisition
and analysis of the data, drafting of the manuscript, and
critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual
content. All authors had full access to the data, contributed to
the study, approved the final version for publication, and take
responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Funding/support
This letter received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
1. World Health Organization. Infection prevention and
control of epidemic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory
diseases in health care. Available from: https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/WHO_CD_EPR_2007_6/en/. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
2. Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health,
Hong Kong SAR Government. Recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) in hospitals/clinics under
serious/emergency response level coronavirus disease
(COVID-19). Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/recommended_ppe_for_nid_eng.pdf. Accessed
19 Mar 2020.
3. Hong Kong SAR Government. HA adjusts service
provision to focus on combatting epidemic. Available
from: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202002/10/P2020021000711.htm. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
4. Hong Kong SAR Government. Protective gear supply
ensured. Available from: https://www.news.gov.hk/eng/2020/03/20200313/20200313_180244_445.html. Accessed 19
Mar 2020.
5. Wong DH, Tang EW, Njo A, et al. Risk stratification
protocol to reduce consumption of personal protective
equipment for emergency surgeries during COVID-19
pandemic. Hong Kong Med J 2020 May 5. Epub ahead of
print Crossref