DOI: 10.12809/hkmj176912
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
COMMENTARY
The era after DAWN: treatment of acute ischaemic stroke
KK Lau, FHKAM (Medicine), FRCP1; Thomas WH Leung, FRCP, FHKAM (Medicine)2;
Yannie OY Soo, MRCP, FHKAM (Medicine)2
1 Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Laichikok, Hong Kong
2 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Corresponding author: Dr KK Lau (laukk2@ha.org.hk)
Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (TPA)
is the only proven medical treatment for acute
ischaemic stroke.1 Early recanalisation of occluded
vessels can be achieved in 30% to 46% of cases.1
Prognosis for patients who fail recanalisation is
mostly dismal unless endovascular thrombectomy
can be performed in a timely manner.2 Over the
last few years, neurologists around the world have
witnessed a paradigm shift in treating stroke patients
with moderate-to-severe neurological disability (ie,
an National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of
10-25, or even higher).3
Five randomised studies that recruited
patients refractory to TPA (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE,
REVASCAT, SWIFT PRIME, and EXTEND IA)
showed that endovascular thrombectomy improved
clinical outcomes in terms of reducing functional
disability at 90 days (ie, a modified Rankin Scale
[mRS] of 0-2).3 In a meta-analysis of these five
studies by HERMES collaboration, the investigators
directly accessed and extracted patient data at an
individual level. They used mixed-effects modelling
with random effects for parameters of interest,
and mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression
models to calculate common odds ratios (cOR). In
both cases, they adjusted the age, gender, baseline
stroke severity, site of occlusion, baseline Alberta
Stroke Program Early CT Score, time from onset
to randomisation, and whole population (shift
analysis).3 Of 1287 patients studied, 634 underwent
endovascular thrombectomy and 653 received TPA.
Those who underwent endovascular thrombectomy
had reduced disability, with mRS of 0 to 2 at 90 days,
and an adjusted cOR of 2.49 (95% confidence interval
[CI]=1.76-3.53; P<0.0001). The number-needed-to-treat to reduce one level of disability on mRS
was 2.6. There was no heterogeneity of treatment
effect across all subgroups, including patients older
than 80 years (cOR 3.68, 95% CI=1.95-6.92) and
randomisation more than 300 minutes (1.76, 1.05-2.97).3 Among the five trials, only MR CLEAN had
complete recruitment4; the other four studies were
prematurely terminated due to the high probability
of improvement according to interim analyses.3
Although endovascular thrombectomy studies
have reset the treatment paradigm for large cerebral
vessel occlusion stroke, the recently published
DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment with Clinical
Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late
Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention
with Trevo) study went one step further in this
revolution.5 6
The DAWN trial extended the therapeutic
time window for endovascular thrombectomy to
up to 24 hours in carefully selected patients based
on a clinical-radiological mismatch.5 The study
enrolled patients with acute large intracranial
vessel occlusion, namely the terminal internal
carotid artery or M1 middle cerebral artery (on
computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance
angiography), who presented after 6 to 24 hours,
with a mismatch between the severity of clinical
deficit and infarct volume (measured by magnetic
resonance diffusion-weighted imaging or perfusion
CT) and defined according to age (<80 years or
≥80 years). Patients were randomised to receive
standard care plus endovascular thrombectomy
or standard care alone. The two end points were
mean score for disability on the utility-weighted
mRS, ranging from 0 (death) to 10 (no symptoms or
disability) and functional independence, or mRS of 0
to 2 at 90 days.6 The DAWN study was prematurely
stopped since the prespecified interim analysis
showed a high probability of superior outcome in
the thrombectomy group.6 Among the 206 patients
recruited, 107 were in the thrombectomy group
and 99 were in the control group. At 31 months, the
mean score of utility-weighted mRS at 90 days was
5.5 in the thrombectomy group and 3.4 in the control
group; adjusted difference (Bayesian analysis) was
2.0 points, with 95% credible interval of 1.1 to 3.0
and posterior probability of superiority being >0.999.
The adjusted functional independence at 90 days
was 49% in the thrombectomy group and 13% in the
control group6; adjusted difference was 33% points,
with 95% credible interval of 24 to 44 and posterior
probability of superiority being >0.999.
The salvageable tissue-based approach for
patient selection was a key factor in DAWN.7 Despite
the longer onset-to-treatment time compared with
previous endovascular thrombectomy trials, the
treatment benefit (number-needed-to-treat=2
for better score for disability at 90 days) remains
highest among all the acute stroke trials to date. The
decision for reperfusion therapy in acute stroke has
been conventionally governed by a definitive ‘time
window’. Replacing clock time by salvageable tissue
provided treatment opportunities for 60% of patients
in this trial who awake with a stroke, and 14.3% of
all ischaemic stroke patients who presented to the
emergency department.8
The benefit of early intravenous TPA has
been proven for decades.1 In the real world, due
to various limitations, its availability varies widely
among countries.9 10 According to the Management
Information Portal (an intranet for the Hospital
Authority staff), in 2015-2016 there were about
11 000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke and
unspecified stroke in Hong Kong. With around 70
neurologists in the public sector serving a population
of more than 7 million, the narrow therapeutic
window for reperfusion therapy poses a great
challenge to an acute stroke service. Since 2012, the
introduction of telestroke with iPad has expedited
the development of 24-hour thrombolytic therapy
in Hong Kong. Through videoconferencing and tele-radiology,
off-site neurologists can now promptly
evaluate acute stroke patients for thrombolytic
therapy despite the absence or inadequacy of on-site
specialist support. Nonetheless, although advances
in technology can overcome geographical barriers
and bring expertise to the bedside, it will not replace
the need for stroke specialists who make treatment
decisions through teleconsultation. Currently, a
round-the-clock 24/7 TPA service for acute stroke
is available in only seven of the 17 acute hospitals
in Hong Kong. This huge service gap calls for an
immediate input of resources for team development
(including neurologists, emergency physicians,
radiologists, radiographers, and stroke nurses) and
expansion of imaging facilities to allow a uniform
service provision to all people in Hong Kong.
Despite the extended therapeutic time window
in the DAWN trial, treatment should not be delayed
because as many as two million neurons die every
minute in an ischaemic brain.11 Every effort should
be made to shorten the door-to-treatment time,
recommended to be less than 60 minutes.12 An
optimal TPA protocol could reduce a median door-to-needle time from 61 to 46 minutes.13 The Angels programme is a global initiative that aims to optimise
quality of acute stroke treatment.14 Participating
centres are invited to compare their performance
with that recommended by international guidelines.
A gap analysis can be conducted to identify areas
for improvement. The Angels initiative offers online
training to members of the stroke teams with the
aim of reducing onset-to-door time and door-to-needle
time.14
In conclusion, acute stroke therapy has
advanced rapidly over the last few years. The extended
therapeutic window for endovascular thrombectomy
will substantially increase the number of stroke
patients who require urgent assessment, timely
neuroimaging tests, and immediate endovascular
intervention.
Although the Hospital Authority should take
the lead and proactively improve the acute stroke
care system, health care providers should also
prepare themselves for the surging awareness of
stroke and treatment expectations of the general
public after DAWN.
Declaration
As an editor of this journal, TWH Leung was not involved in
the peer review process of this article. All other authors have
no conflicts of interest to declare. All authors had full access to
the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version
for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and
integrity.
References
1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator
for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-7. Crossref
2. Heldner MR, Zubler C, Mattle HP, et al. National Institutes
of Health stroke scale score and vessel occlusion in 2152
patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013;44:1153-7. Crossref
3. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular
thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis
of individual patient data from five randomised
trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723-31. Crossref
4. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized
trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N
Engl J Med 2015;372:11-20. Crossref
5. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL, et al. Mechanical
thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase
alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled
trial. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1138-47. Crossref
6. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy
6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit
and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11-21. Crossref
7. Dávalos A, Blanco M, Pedraza S, et al. The clinical-DWI
mismatch: a new diagnostic approach to the brain tissue at
risk of infarction. Neurology 2004;62:2187-92. Crossref
8. Mackey J, Kleindorfer D, Sucharew H, et al. Population-based
study of wake-up strokes. Neurology 2011;76:1662-7. Crossref
9. Hong KS, Saver JL. Quantifying the value of stroke disability
outcomes: WHO global burden of disease project disability
weights for each level of the modified rankin scale. Stroke
2009;40:3828-33. Crossref
10. King’s College London for the Stroke Alliance for Europe
(SAFE). The burden of stroke in Europe report. Available
from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_burden_of_stroke_in_europe_-_challenges_for_policy_makers.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
11. Saver JL. Time is brain—quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263-6. Crossref
12. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, et al. Door-to-needle
times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and
clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after
a quality improvement initiative. JAMA 2014;311:1632-40. Crossref
13. Meretoja A, Weir L, Ugalde M, et al. Helsinki model cut
stroke thrombolysis delays to 25 minutes in Melbourne in
only 4 months. Neurology 2013;81:1071-6. Crossref
14. Angels Community. Available from: https://angels-initiative.com/. Accessed 14 Jul 2017.